Open Minded Realism

In this video the Austrian politician Riccardo Bosi speaks with Alex Jones talking about issues with encroaching corruption and tyranny in the world, and he explains how his campaign will liberate Australia from it.

[Note October 7, 2021: I haven’t seen this video until after I posted this article.  I’m very impressed with Bosi, I hope he is popular in Australia.  He is that country’s best hope.  There are no major politicians like him in the United States.]

 

This is the launch video for his party AustraliaOne.  Amazing!

 

It is great to see how he speaks out about Freemasonry.  In this video he speaks with the Australian activist Joel Jammal, talking about false allegations of being a Freemason.

Members of a stupid climate change activist group “Insulate Britain” blocked the street in the UK, even when an ambulance was trying to get through, prompting drivers and a paramedic crew to drag them out of the way.

[Note: Man-made climate change is a myth and a fraud anyway, as this article summarizes in detail.]

This article details how Joe Biden outsourced security at the airport in Kabul to the Taliban and other Jihadist groups, who then selected whoever they wanted to be sent to the U.S. rather than the people that they were instructed to allow through.

[Note: October 20, 2021— The text of this article has been updated.]

Following is a summary of this Jihad Watch watch article by Daniel Greenfield:

— After Joe Biden imported tens of thousands of supposed “translators” from Afghanistan, refugee groups are now desperately looking for translators to communicate with them.

— There were more Afghan “translators” applying for visas than there were American soldiers to translate for, being indicative of the fact that the vast majority of them were never translators, with only a minuscule amount of them fitting that criteria.

— Front Page Mag has previously run articles about the phony translator scheme, such as “How the ‘Interpreter’ Scam Brought 75,000 Iraqis and Afghans to America”, and “Saving Afghan Interpreters’ is a Scam That Would Bring 100,000 Afghans to U.S.”

— Eventually, almost any Afghan who worked for any U.S. organization could apply for a visa, but Biden’s retreat made the scam even worse because he didn’t even evacuate the approved SIV visa holders who might have actually worked for the United States.   State Department sources have said that the majority of SIV holders were left behind.

— The Biden administration claims to have evacuated 124,000 people from Afghanistan, with only 5,000 of them being Americans.  60,000 of them have been brought into the United States, with Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas saying that only 1,800 are SIV holders, and only another 8,000 are citizens or have green cards.  That leaves 50,000 of them being brought here with no legal basis, with tens of thousands more likely still to come.

— Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said, “[the] balance of that population are individuals whose applications have not yet been processed for approval who may qualify as SIVs and have not yet applied, who qualify or would qualify—I should say—as P-1 or P-2 refugees who have been employed by the United States government in Afghanistan and are otherwise vulnerable Afghan nationals, such as journalists, human rights advocates, etc.”

— Problems are already occurring with a migrant sexually assaulting two children, one beating his wife, and others bringing child brides with them.  The wife who was beaten also told a translator that nine women have been killed so far at Fort McCoy, but there is no confirmation of that.

– Actual human rights workers in Kabul were mostly middle aged women who didn’t wear burkas, but nothing has been seen of them at Ft. McCoy or anywhere else in the refugee resettlement system.  Some have remained in Afghanistan and are risking their lives by organizing protests against the Taliban.

— The Afghan evacuees are mostly military age males and older men with young girls, with the women and girls that come along with them wearing burkas and appearing fearful.  [Note: The abusive entrapped situation of those women and girls will not change in the U.S., as they will mostly live in Islamic “seed communities” that are intended to increase in size and become Islamic “no-go-zones,” as is occurring all over Europe.  Also, “Community Policing” is how Sharia patrols will soon be implemented in those areas, as is also happening in Europe.]

— The Kabul embassy personnel had tainted the pool of applicants by sending out “electronic credentials” that State Department officials claimed were almost immediately disseminated to everyone in a large crowd indiscriminately at the airport.

— People who were actually qualified to be evacuated were apparently deliberately kept out by the Biden Administration, who outsourced security to the Taliban, who then passed their authority to checkpoints manned by an Al Queda-allied group.  Biden officials provided those people with a list of the people who they were supposed to admit.  Not surprisingly, the “security” prevented some from getting to the airport while letting others through, doing so regardless of credentials.

— The Taliban cashed in on the American presence in Afghanistan, where Jihadists were making more money from “taxing” U.S. contractors than from the opium trade.  And thus Biden’s “security” forces were extorting huge bribes during the evacuation, only allowing people to pass through if they paid thousands of dollars in bribes.  Therefore, tens of thousands of SIV holders were kept out, and tens of thousands of illegitimate Afghans bribed their way in.

— In other words, it wasn’t an “evacuation,” but rather it was a massive Taliban human trafficking scheme.

— The tens of thousands of Afghans who were brought to the U.S. will be in the country permanently.  They cannot be deported.

— The question is: How many of the people that the Taliban selected to come to the U.S. are affiliated with Al Queda and ISIS?

— Sources have said that “0.5%” of the evacuees have been flagged for terrorist ties.  [But note that it has been reported that most of them have no records at all, so there is no way to know how many are terrorist affiliated or not.]

— Untold billions of taxpayer dollars will be squandered on resettling the Taliban’s human trafficked migrants.  They will receive every possible type of welfare and a fortune will be spent just on “translators” at resettlement agencies, government agencies, schools, hospitals, and the local police.

— Huge amounts of money will also almost certainly be spent dealing with their abuses through the criminal justice system.

— Eventually when the SIV holders and their families who are still in Afghanistan come over, they will have to be resettled as well, doubling the refugee load.

— The Taliban likely made a fortune by trafficking rapists and terrorists into the U.S., as well as anyone else who could pay.  Terrorist activity coming from such people will be a certainty.

This article explains that hundred of Afghans have walked away from the U.S. bases where they are being processed, thus forfeiting any financial and other assistance that they would have received.  The issue is very worrisome because the unvetted Afghans for some reason felt it was important to leave and disappear into the country as quickly as possible, despite the fact that they would have received substantial financial support if they would have stayed.

[Note: October 20, 2021— The text of this article as been updated.]

Following is a summary of this Jihad Watch article by Daniel Greenfield:

— Many hundreds of Afghan evacuees have been reported to be “walking away” from the military bases where they are currently being housed before receiving their U.S. resettlement services, according to Reuters, being referred to as “independent departures.”

— Such people could have a variety of reasons to do so, such as:

(1)  They’re not who they say they are and they are worried that the authorities will find out.

(2)  They’re committing crimes such as trafficking young girls, as had already been reported at Fort McCoy.

(3)  They’re terrorists here to infiltrate America.

— It is reported that the Afghans walking away in such a manner is “raising alarms” among immigration advocates who think the migrants are “at risk” due to giving up their assistance.  However they aren’t saying that they are alarmed about a terrorist treat, but rather they seem to mostly be worried about the money that they will lose since they are reimbursed for each refugee that they resettle.

[Note: I wonder if the “independent departures” have at least been fingerprinted and photographed, ect..]

— The news report quotes the head of Northern Command General Glen VanHerck who claimed that the number of incidents of robbery and theft among the migrants on the base were “substantially lower than the U.S. population,” saying that there were only eight cases in six weeks.

— The news report also claims: “However, U.S. officials stress that all of the Afghans leaving U.S. bases had already undergone security screening before arriving in the United States.”  But in reality security screening is impossible because Afghanistan didn’t even have a single system of paperwork.  [Also this Tucker Carlson video explains how it is impossible to “vet” the Afghans that are being brought.]

— The news report states, “Reuters viewed a document, entitled ‘Departee Information, that is meant to warn Afghans considering leaving before completing their resettlement.  It reminds them that, on base, they can get their immigration paperwork processed and even cash to help pay for travel to their destination in the United States.”

— … Yet despite loosing such an enormous source of money and other assistance, the Afghans still thought it was somehow necessary to walk away, which is very worrisome.

— The report also states, “Immigration experts say Afghans who leave the bases are not breaking U.S. laws and military officials have no legal authority to hold law-abiding Afghans against their will at any of the eight locations hosting 53,000 Afghans who fled the Taliban on U.S. evacuation flights.”  [Note: Why do they not have the authority to do so?!]

Following is a summary of this Breitbart article by John Binder:

49 House and Senate Republicans voted for and passed a $6.4 Billion Democrat bill for welfare, driver’s licenses, housing costs, and more for 95,000 Afghans brought to the U.S. by Joe Biden.  The Republican lawmakers voted for the provisions despite overwhelming opposition to the Afghan resettlement by their constituents.

The funding for the resettlement operation was slipped into a government funding bill, and it will give benefits such as welfare, housing assistance, medical coverage, and state-issued drivers licenses to the Afghans.

The provision giving the IDs and driver’s licenses allow Afghans to skirt vital national security requirements that were put in place after the 9/11 attacks, according to the expert Andrew Arthur:

Most disturbingly, the bill leaves Biden’s resettlement operation wide open for future waves of Afghans brought to the U.S. by extending such resettlement to September 2022 and beyond for the foreign relatives of Afghans who get resettled in American communities.

Senator Bill Hagerty (R-TN), who voted against the bill, said the provisions “opens the U.S. to unlimited refugee resettlement from Afghanistan with zero vetting, putting our security at even greater risk.”

The 34 House Republicans who voted for the bill are as follows:

Mark Amodei (R-NV)
Tom Cole (R-OK)
Rodney Davis (R-IL)
Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL)
Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA)
Andrew Garbarino (R-NY)
Carlos Giménez (R-FL)
Tony Gonzalez (R-TX)
Anthony Gonzalez (R-OH)
Garrett Graves (R-LA)
Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-WA)
Clay Higgins (R-LA)
John Katko (R-NY)
Young Kim (R-CA)
Adam Kinzinger (R-IL)
Doug LaMalfa (R-CA)
Julia Letlow (R-LA)
Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY)
Patrick McHenry (R-NC)
Peter Meijer (R-MI)
Blake Moore (R-UT)
Dan Newhouse (R-WA)
Jay Obernolte (R-CA)
Tom Reed (R-NY)
Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA)
Hal Rogers (R-KY)
Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL)
Mike Simpson (R-ID)
Chris Smith (R-NJ)
Glenn Thompson (R-PA)
Mike Turner (R-OH)
Fred Upton (R-MI)
David Valadao (R-CA)
Don Young (R-AK)

The 15 Senate Republicans who voted for the funding bill are as follows:

Roy Blunt (R-MO)
Richard Burr (R-NC)
Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV)
Bill Cassidy (R-LA)
Susan Collins (R-ME)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
John Kennedy (R-LA)
Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
Mitt Romney (R-UT)
Mike Rounds (R-SD)
Richard Shelby (R-AL)
Thom Tillis (R-NC)
Todd Young (R-IN)

Refugee contractors will be given $1.7 billion to “provide culturally and linguistically appropriate services, including wrap-around services during temporary housing and after resettlement, housing assistance, medical assistance, legal assistance, and case management assistance.”

“Refugee” resettlement costs taxpayers nearly $9 billion every five years.  Over the course of a lifetime, taxpayers each pay about $133,000 per refugee.

[The “Refugee Resettlement Program” is actually mostly a “Muslim resettlement program,” where the people brought are usually not even actually refugees but rather they are simply migrants who are selected by a corrupt UN program, where they are chosen instead of more legitimate refugees such as Christians and others who are persecuted by Muslims.

Also the program is not intended to “rescue Muslims from Islam,” but rather its purpose is to secretively disperse Islamic “seed communities” throughout the U.S. with all of the backwards and dangerous aspects of their culture intact.

The program was initially set up by Joe Biden and Ted Kennedy during the Carter Administration in 1980.]

Following is a summary of an article from Bare Naked Islam:

[Note that I don’t agree with everything that BNI says or aspects of its approach, but it is an important resource about Islam where I have learned a lot.]

An underground parking lot in Hanau, Germany, has unveiled priority parking spaces for migrants and homosexual drivers only, announcing that the new spaces are to to be used by drivers with “a special need for protection.”

The overwhelming majority of migrants in Germany are Muslims, so the parking space is essentially for them.

City councilor Thomas Morlock said at the unveiling of the parking spaces that the aim is to help people who are more “diverse” than others.

The same parking spaces are reserved for both groups, despite the fact that adult homosexuality is prohibited in Islam with the penalty of death.

 

In some parts of the Islamic world, homosexuals are executed by being thrown off of high buildings, with their corpses then being stoned by mobs of people where they land.

Homosexuals are hanged in Iran.  [Note that Iran is covertly controlled by the exact same people who control the Biden Administration.]

Also see this article about the issue.

[Strangely though, only homosexuality between two ADULTS is prohibited in Islam.  Adult Muslim men having sex with young boys is accepted and it is widely practiced.  A PBS Frontline documentary “The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan” details that.]

[NOTE: October 3, 2021— I have included some information from “debunking” sources, making corrections to this article where necessary, including updating the written description of the “We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook” video, and including two “debunking” videos with written descriptions at the end of this article.]

When the Sandy Hook school shooting was first being reported in the media in November of 2012, I remembered thinking that aspects of it were strange even before hearing about the avalanche of issues with it.  For example, I heard an NPR broadcast where they interviewed one of the grieving parents when the shooting was just starting to be reported, where he was crying: “If ONLY the state assembly would have passed bill HR-15.853.23.58 [or whatever] last month that didn’t pass by five votes in an extended session [or whatever]!” ect..  Even though it was at the beginning of his supposedly grieving.

An overwhelming amount of evidence shows that the shooting was an elaborate hoax, as I detail in this article.  I present two documentaries: “Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4, and 5 Dimensions,” and “We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook”.

Of course it is preferable that such attacks are hoaxes rather than real, however the motivation for doing so is to strip people of their rights, such as to confiscate guns from law abiding citizens.  And the political Establishment also engages in real attacks as well for the same nefarious types of reasons, such as the 9/11 attacks.

 

Does this look like a genuinely grieving parent?!  Notice that he was initially smiling.

 

 

This video footage shows people circling around at the firehouse near the school while the shooting was supposedly still happening, in an apparent coordinated attempt to appear chaotically preoccupied while a news helicopter was circling overhead.  The video also points out that no evacuated children are seen in the footage while parents of the children are seen milling around in the same manner nonetheless.  (Also is was shown that one of the key “witnesses” that the media often interviewed Gene Rosen was also among the people in that parking lot rather than being where he claimed to be.)

[NOTE that a “debunking video” exists about the video where they claim that the footage was looped for deceptive purposes, as is apparent due to watching a car on the top left.  However, it is obvious that the people were milling around for the visual effect nonetheless

ALSO NOTE: October 3, 2021— I have found another video that claims to debunk the footage, saying that people were walking in circles because areas of the firehouse were locked, and it claims that the people were milling around in such a manner because they were worried.  The video is at the end of this page.]

 

UPDATE: October 1, 2021— I previously wrote that I thought this video was likely some sort of disinformation, however after looking at it again I realize that he is trying to determine the exact time of the day when Gene Rosen was seen in the parking lot by using “Shadow Direction Analysis.”

 

This well-made documentary “Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4, and 5 Dimensions,” by Sofia Smallstorm explains many issues with the Sandy Hook shooting hoax.

[Note:  I didn’t find out about this documentary until I was finished transcribing “We Need to Talk”.  Both are different from each other and they mostly talk about different aspects of the event with little overlapping.  This one is shorter and I like that it doesn’t use silhouettes when people are talking, but I also recommend watching the other documentary as well.]

 

This documentary “We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook” exposes many aspects of the Sandy Hook school shooting that show the event was a staged hoax.

[DISCLAIMER:  This video contains a lot of good summarized information, but I do have some issues with it though.  Most significantly, the people speaking in the video certainly should have identified themselves rather than simply being presented as “silhouettes”!  That wasn’t always a problem when they present news footage for example, but in other cases they make claims where it would be beneficial for them to endorse it to reassure the viewers that what is being said is legitimate.  The video contains enough concrete evidence for it to be included in this article nonetheless, but I definitely think that it should be remade without any anonymity.

I have found some supposed “debunking” information online that finds minor issues with some of the information, such as at this link, but it certainly does not debunk the event being a hoax.

NOTE: October 3, 2021— I have added corrections to the end of the following summarized points in bold italic text.]

Following is a summary of points mentioned in this documentary:

— It is shown that many of the parents of the supposed victims were Establishment connected leftists and gun confiscation advocates; with many ramping up their activism after the supposed shooting to exploit the event to advocate for extreme anti-gun legislation.

— The official story of the children being evacuated from the school does not at all match police dash cam footage from the parking lot.  [It has been shown that the date on the dash cam was incorrect, however the children are still not seen because the footage of them being evacuated was redacted.]

— The school principal was quoted in newspapers talking about the shooting, however she was later claimed to be killed in the shooting.

— Much police activity was apparently initially occurring at the house next door to the Lanza residence crime scene where the shooter is alleged to have murdered his mother that day, rather than at the Lanza residence itself. [It has been shown that the report about the event said that the police parked at the house next door.]

— Many media reports showed people who survived the supposed shooting (as well as parents) being calm and nonchalant when they were interviewed about it on television, with some of them even smiling when they did so.

— A year before the shooting, a bill was passed in Connecticut to block the disclosure of all aspects of pediatric autopsy reports, which was initially opposed by the chief medical examiner Wayne Carver, but he then inexplicably did an about-face and supported the bill as its primary sponsor.

— On the weekend of the event, the Newtown town clerk Debbie Aurelia broke the law by refusing requests of the Associated Press, New York Post, and other media outlets to supply copies of the death certificates of the supposed victims, and later she even crafted legislation with State Representatives to restrict all death records related to the supposed event, including 911 calls, crime scene photographs, and witness statements.  She was also previously the subject of two ethics hearings in 2010.

— Shockingly, the ruling was then extended to cover all homicides in Connecticut, making all homicides records inaccessible for scrutiny by the public or the media.  Advocates of open information who were opposed to the suppression of the information about crimes were continually berated as being insensitive.  A five year prison term felony provision was also suggested for the public release of any information relating to any homicide in Connecticut.

— Footage is shown of Connecticut Senators who were strongly opposed to that suppression of public records about crimes, calling it “Orwellian”, explaining that it would make reversing wrongful convictions impossible, and saying “it undermines transparency and accountability in our criminal justice system on a massive scale.”

— Due to the legislation, the political Establishment in the state of Connecticut can now get away with committing any serious crime that it wants without any possibility of being exposed for it.

— Information about the mental state of the supposed shooter Adam Lanza was suppressed, with the parents of the supposed victims strangely not being interested in that information being released despite the fact that it could help to stop future shootings.

— It is shown how the media portrayed a man named Gene Rosen as helping students running from the shooting, however he continually gave completely differing accounts of what happened to the media, and helicopter footage shot during the morning of the event shows him in the parking lot of the firehouse which entirely contradicts all of his other claims of what happened.

— Web pages related to the event were put online before the event took place, which has been cached on Google.  For example, an article entitled “Talking with your child about the Sandy Hook Tragedy” was posted on December 10, 2012 (which was before the shooting), and the Google cache date was on the 13th, which was one day prior to the event.  The issue with the article became well-known soon after the event, prompting apparent disinformation agents attempting to confuse the matter by publishing reams of technical jargon that attempted to distract from the issue. [Information has come out showing that it is likely that the cache dates were incorrect due to technical issues.]

— The United Way organization also “jumped the gun” on the event, publishing a webpage before the event entitled “Sandy Hook School Support Fund”, dated December 11.  Once the issue of that page became well known, Google then released a ridiculous statement about it, claiming: “This is a technical glitch on our end.  [T]he date Google’s search engine first ‘saw’ the page was 12/14/2012 at 6:58 pm.  We’re looking into a fix, but it may take some weeks.”  However, even if that date was actually when it was posted, it would still be an impossibility because of the lengthy amount of time it would have taken to set up the fund and create the web content for it.  Well-meaning people have donated millions of dollars to that account.  [It is claimed that it would be easy for United Way to create the web page in one day, however I don’t really believe that.]

[ADDITIONAL NOTE: October 3, 2021— I had previously mentioned that the United Way account is “fraudulent.”  The rest of the evidence about the event shows that the shooting is a hoax, but I’m sure that at least some people involved with the account did not know anything about that.]

— The owner of the home next to the Lanzas (where the strange police activity was apparently happening) was John Trentacosta, who is the President and CEO of the Newtown Savings Bank that is associated with the United Way Sandy Hook Fund.  Trentacosta is also a member of a council at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York.

— The official report about the event was a 6,500 page “data dump” that was deprived of any useful information due to the large number of redactions that were implemented.  It also contains many inconsistencies and contradictions inside of it, despite taking an entire year to be published.  Lt. Paul Vance of the Connecticut State Police was involved with the publishing of it, and he is also notorious for having arrogant tyrannical views.

— There are many issues with the DNA evidence from the supposed crime scene, where the DNA found on the trigger of the rifle, the pistol grip of the rifle, and the shoulder stock of the rifle was eliminated as potentially coming from Nancy or Adam Lanza.  The only place where Adam’s DNA was found was in a “mixture” on the forearm of the rifle, where a “mixture” means it contains the DNA of more than one individual.  Then in 2013, a match was found with a New York convict’s DNA profile when he wrote a letter about the Sandy Hook incident, but the issue was swept under the rug and buried in the data dump.  A Connecticut TV news station reported about the man writing the letter and the fact that the issue was buried in the report.  [It has been found that Adam’s DNA has been found on the Bushmaster rifle, and it has been shown that the DNA of the New York convict was only found on an envelope.]

— Very strangely, the DNA of one of his teachers Lauren Rousseau was found on many components of his weapons, such as the pistol grip of the rifle, shoulder stock of the rifle, the feed area inside of the magazine, on many of the other magazines, and on thirteen bullets in the magazines.  Most of the DNA found was “mixtures.”  The only unredacted DNA source that is distinctly listed alone is of the principal Dawn Hochsprung, whose DNA has strangely been found on many of the weapons, including even on bullets that were inside the loaded magazine. [See the documentary at the end of this article for information about the DNA.]

— Inconsistencies exist with the meta data stamps of photographs and videos that were often shown in the news. [The EXIF data on images can easily be manipulated, so the date data on photographs and videos cannot be trusted.]

— It was reported in the media that a custodian named Rick Thorne was a “Paul Revere” where he supposedly ran through the school saying “A gunman is coming!  A gunman is coming!”, but a recording of a 911 call he made contradicts such media reports.  Also it appears that previous school pamphlets and documents were modified to deceitfully claim that he worked at the school in the previous years, despite the fact that he was still living and working in Chelmsford, Massachusetts at that time.

— Video evidence shows that roads to the school were blocked by police cars so ambulances could have no access, and instead ambulances were parked at a nearby firehouse.  Presumably the gridlock was created to keep unwanted medial personnel out who were not in on the hoax.  Some EMTs later complained in the media about not being given access to help people.

— There was no evidence of a chaotic scene at the school in the parking lot, where there were no ambulances as well.  It was later reported that a few people were supposedly still unaccounted for at the time, however there was no urgency in the parking lot, where dash cam footage shows officers setting out buffets of snacks on the hood of a police car and engaging in idle chit-chat, despite the fact that it was in the middle of a mass shooting event where massacred first graders were supposedly just feet away!

— The Connecticut police received $2.5 million in taxpayer money for “healing”, and the Obama administration gave $7.1 million to first responders, victim’s families, and law enforcement.

— No EMTs were allowed in the school building (except three as mentioned later), and it was eventually announced that the bodies were to be kept in the building, with the ambulances waiting down the street at the firehouse.  The EMS services did not behave in any way as protocol dictated, since a genuine shooting would have had trauma helicopters flying in and out, performing CPR the entire way to the hospital, with the patients being declared dead only at the hospital after extensive measures were taken.  However, despite the obvious supposed negligence of the emergency response workers, not a single one of the parents has filed a lawsuit about it!

— Video footage is shown of people circling around at the firehouse in a ridiculous coordinated attempt to appear preoccupied while a news helicopter was circling overhead.  Similar footage is also in the documentary “Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4 & 5 Dimensions” [A video at the end this article claims that people were walking around in such a manner because parts of the firehouse were locked, and it claims that people were walking in circles because they were worried.]

— The state police reported that 25 of the bodies “weren’t even worth rushing to a hospital,” and only three EMTs were allowed access to the school to assess the dozens of bodies.  The bodies were supposedly left sitting in the school during the entire day.

— It was said by Adam Lanza’s father that he could barely tie his own shoes, yet it was claimed that he was able to supposedly kill 26 people in minutes and then carry all the bodies to a central location. [It was actually said by his mother that he couldn’t tie his own shoes.]

— Documents show that Adam Lanza likely didn’t even attend Sandy Hook elementary school, but rather he went to a school called St. Rose of Lima. [That information is revealed to be based on on “recollections” in a report.]

— The news initially reported that Adam’s older brother Ryan Lanza did the shooting instead.

— In 2013, Newtown charities raised $27 million in response to the supposed incident, the state of Connecticut was given $50 million to demolish and rebuild the Sandy Hook school, GE gave a $15 million donation to Newtown, the U.S. Department of Education awarded a $1.3 million grant and later a $1.9 million grant to “further support recovery efforts,” and online fundraisers raised millions of dollars.  Even two years after the event, the families are continuing to ask for more money, where many are soliciting “goals” of receiving tens of thousand of dollars, with some having goals of receiving upward of $500,000, not counting government grants!

— President Obama used the supposed Sandy Hook shooting as a justification to advocate for a $500 million gun control plan that included background checks, banning high capacity magazines, increased school security, and more mental health screening.  The families went along with the agenda hand-in-hand, frequently publicly advocating for it.

— There is no confirmation of Adam Lanza’s mental health history, yet it didn’t stop the political Establishment and pharmaceutical industry from lobbying and passing lucrative mental health related legislation.  Adam Lanza’s stated Psychiatrist Paul Fox was forced to surrender his license in July of 2012 for drugging patients and having sex with them, and he has since fled to New Zealand.

— It was claimed that Adam Lanza’s medical records were destroyed since they are over five years old, however it has been proven that the supposed five year claim is false, and instead the limit is seven years, which means that the records were still accessible when they were inquired about.

— Adam Lanza’s entire existence is shrouded in mystery.  It appears that the most recent pictures of him have been altered to be googly-eyed to make him appear to be a deranged psychopath.  Speculation also exists that Adam and and his older brother Ryan might actually be the same person.

— Fox News interviewed someone from the town named Joshua Flashman, and they falsely created an impression that he was somehow “intimately acquainted” with the Lanza family and said that he knew Adam’s motives firsthand, but instead he simply mentioned to them what he heard being said around town.  That behavior of Fox News was typical of the deception that the Establishment media was engaging in about the situation.

— Adam Lanza’s father was initially not speaking to the media, but he eventually spoke with Andrew Solomon of the New Yorker.  The father of the journalist Andrew Solomon is Howard Solomon, who was then CEO of the pharmaceutical giant Forest Laboratories that manufactures the drug “Lexipro”.  In the article is was claimed that since Adam discontinued using Lexipro it resulted in the attacks.  The police report contradicts the article though, since it doesn’t mention Lexipro, but instead it mentions a drug called “Celexa”, that turned Forest Laboratories into a giant.  The journalist Andrew Solomon is a notorious advocate for the use of pharmaceutical antidepressants, and he is a member of the secretive group the Council on Foreign Relations.

— All of Adam Lanaz’s alleged psychiatrists were from the Yale child study center, and Ezra Griffith from Yale University was appointed to sit on the Sandy Hook Advisory Commission to recommend mental heath care in that State, where he advocated for dangerous psychotropic drugs.

— The political Establishment has been aggressively attempting to conceal or redact any information that shows the attack being a hoax, using an excuse that it would be “traumatizing” for the public to see the information.

 

 Debunking video:  “We Need To Talk About Sandy Hook Debunked Ultimate !!!!”

This documentary explains issues with some of the claims made in the “We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook” documentary, but it does not debunk any of the most significant evidence that was presented.

The following is a summary of points made:

— The time on the dashcam video of one of the squad cars was wrong, so it did in fact show officers running into the building, however the rest of the footage has been “redacted” when the students were claimed to be walking out of the school.

— The EXIF data on images can easily be manipulated, so the wrong date data on photographs and videos cannot be trusted.

— They briefly made a claim saying that it is possible for people to make Google cache dates be whatever they want them to be, but they didn’t provide any evidence or links for the claim other than saying that they “previously did it,” despite the fact that explaining it would have been good “debunking” evidence for this video.

— They said that another report clarifies what rifles were being talked about with the DNA evidence report, which shows that Adam Lanza’s DNA was found on the Bushmaster rifle as well.

— They said that the .22 caliber cartridges were the only ones searched against the DNA database because the others had “DNA from too many people on them.”

— It was claimed in the documentary that there was a DNA match with a convicted felon on the .22 cartridges, however the DNA was actually only found on an envelope flap of a letter that was sent from the convict.

— Adam Lanaza has been listed as “not eliminated as a contributor” of DNA on some of the weapons where the documentary said they didn’t find any from him.

— The official report does say that the police parked their vehicles on the neighbor’s driveway.

— Claims that Adam Lanza didn’t attend Sandy Hook were based on “recollections” in a report.

— To “debunk” the firehouse scene where the people are seen in helicopter footage walking in circles around the building, they said that people were doing so because certain doors were locked due to the police having a command post set up in the building.

— They then raised the issue of the boy in the yellow sweatshirt milling around, claiming that he was actually just worried and being consoled by an adult.  However they neglected to show or talk about the rest of the footage showing the rest of the people milling around as well.

— They claimed that Adam Lanza’s father didn’t actually say that Adam couldn’t tie his own shoes in a New Yorker article, and then they actually showed the excerpt from the article where in fact the father recalled the mother being surprised that Adam could tie his own shoes on a hike. The line actually reads: “Adam had difficulties with coordination and, when he was seventeen, Peter told Nancy they he had to pause to tie his shoes on a hike. Nancy replied in astonishment, ‘He tied his own shoes?’”

— For the final point, they pointed out that the documentary said a “police report” said Adam Lanza piled the bodies in a bathroom, however it was actually a first responder who reported seeing the bodies there instead.

 

Debunking video: “We Need to talk about Sandy Hook – Cached Time Debunked”

This video gives a plausible explanation of how the search engine cache date on a web page talking about the Sandy Hook Event was set to be before the event, it claims that the United Way Sandy Hook shooting fundraising page would have been able to be set up in one day, and it claims that Bing cache dates on a Newtown Bee article can’t be correct.

Following is what it talked about in the video:

A web page was created by a school in Arlington, Ohio talking about the Sandy Hook incident, with its URL having the date of December 10, 2012, and its Google index cache date being on the 13th, which was one day before the event.

The makers of the debunking video explain that the owner of a web marketing company called Spire Advertising that built the Arlington web page said the earlier date of the page was being used as a workaround to a technical glitch that was not yet reported to them, and he then showed Google Analytics data that showed the article had not been viewed until December 17.

The owner of the company then said, “Google indexes these posts based on the date that we ‘send’ them, not based on the date it was posted.”  [Note: But why did they “send” Google this date and time: 12/13/2012, at 01:22:20— which was three days after the backdating?  Google is huge and it presumably crawls pages in a consistent manner, so why is it simply not using the date when it actually indexes the page, since that is what it actually claims the date and time are showing?  I would be convinced of their argument if I could see evidence of Google behaving that way with other pages.]

I’m much less convinced about their supposed “debunking” of the United Way fundraising page issue, however.  It would be technically possible for that page to actually be set up on in one day since it was not custom designed, but it is difficult for me to believe that they would be able to coordinate all of that in one day if they were not already prepared.

The video then mentions another issue with some pages that were indexed by Microsoft “Bing.”  Two separate Microsoft tech support people did confirm that the page was accurate, but the debunkers claim that since it was only Microsoft tech support people confirming it that it couldn’t be trusted because they couldn’t possibly be able to understand such complexities.

In any event, even if the index dates in all of the mentioned cases are actually misunderstandings, it does not change the rest of the overwhelming evidence showing the event being a hoax.