Trump was interviewed on Fox News about the electoral fraud that happened in the election

Donald Trump gave a lengthy interview over the phone with Fox News, where he spoke about issues with fraud that has occurred in the 2020 election.  The host Maria Bartiromo asked him many questions about the situation, and he specifically explained the fraud that happened, and he claimed that he is having difficulties with having elements of the judicial system cooperating with him.

The issues of fraud that Trump mentioned are as follows:  It is shown that many deceased people were registered and voted for Biden;  The Dominion company and their voting machines are totally corrupt;  Democrat thugs kicked certified poll watchers out of voting locations in areas such as Detroit and Philadelphia;  Mail-in ballots were found to be discarded in many locations;  Extensions for voting were granted after the election was over;  and Joe Biden got very statistically improbable results in areas where the most fraud potentially occurred.

They mentioned a “Federalist” article entitled “5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms,” that explains many of the suspiciously lopsided issues of Biden winning the election.

Trump explained that there are hundreds of people with sworn affidavits attesting to the corrupt situations that happened in the election, but he is claiming that “the courts are not letting him be heard” due to the courts telling him that “he doesn’t have any standing.”  He also said that lawyers and judges who attempt to take his case are being threatened, and the FBI and Department of Justice are refusing to cooperate with him about all such matters due to corruption of the high ranking members.

In other portions of the interview that are not in the above compilation video, Trump strangely claimed that “he finished the border wall,” he mentioned the importance of getting rid of “Section 230” that protects online content providers from liability, and he touted the vaccines that he is planning to release soon.

[Note about the “Section 230” issue—  I don’t see how INCREASING the liability for content providers for what users post on their services would help the censorship situation.  I think it would mostly encourage content providers to censor MORE since they would be more liable for lawsuits due to whatever their users do.  This Breitbart article explains that the Supreme Court judge Clarence Thomas said that he thinks such companies should be held more liable for the content that people post on them, and the people in the comment section of the article were mostly applauding him for that, presumably thinking that it would somehow be “the end of censorship.”]

In any event, certainly there is much proof about the situations of fraud that Trump had mentioned, but his claims of the courts not cooperating with him sounds strange to me.  There is a huge amount of public interest in having a fair outcome to the election, so I think Trump’s claims of “potentially not being able to get a court date in the Supreme Court,” or “lawyers refusing to work with him” is ridiculous.  Clearly he actually won the election despite his often divisive behavior, so if he in fact wants to be the winner it should be easy enough for him to prove his case to do that.  For example, Rudy Giuliani is a prominent lawyer and he obviously wants to help, so why would some other random lawyers refusing to work with Trump even be any sort of an issue?

Near the end of the interview, Trump said that he would “give 125% of his effort to the matter,” but what “effort” does it even really require on his part since he only simply needs to appoint lawyers to deal with it?  He didn’t have any problems with the effort of explaining the situation during the Fox News interview, so why would it be so difficult for him to appoint people to deal with the situation, especially when supposedly “half” of all of the political power of the United States depends on the election having a good outcome for him?!  Aren’t there quality lawyers coming out of the woodwork asking for an opportunity to work on his case?— Of course there are!  It almost seems as if Trump is trying to create an impression that Republicans inept and not able to deal even with that situation.