Trump was interviewed on Fox News about the electoral fraud that happened in the election

Donald Trump gave a lengthy interview over the phone with Fox News, where he spoke about issues with fraud that has occurred in the 2020 election.  The host Maria Bartiromo asked him many questions about the situation, and he specifically explained the fraud that happened, and he claimed that he is having difficulties with having elements of the judicial system cooperating with him.

The issues of fraud that Trump mentioned are as follows:  It is shown that many deceased people were registered and voted for Biden;  The Dominion company and their voting machines are totally corrupt;  Democrat thugs kicked certified poll watchers out of voting locations in areas such as Detroit and Philadelphia;  Mail-in ballots were found to be discarded in many locations;  Extensions for voting were granted after the election was over;  and Joe Biden got very statistically improbable results in areas where the most fraud potentially occurred.

They mentioned a “Federalist” article entitled “5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms,” that explains many of the suspiciously lopsided issues of Biden winning the election.

Trump explained that there are hundreds of people with sworn affidavits attesting to the corrupt situations that happened in the election, but he is claiming that “the courts are not letting him be heard” due to the courts telling him that “he doesn’t have any standing.”  He also said that lawyers and judges who attempt to take his case are being threatened, and the FBI and Department of Justice are refusing to cooperate with him about all such matters due to corruption of the high ranking members.

In other portions of the interview that are not in the above compilation video, Trump strangely claimed that “he finished the border wall,” he mentioned the importance of getting rid of “Section 230” that protects online content providers from liability, and he touted the vaccines that he is planning to release soon.

[Note about the “Section 230” issue—  I don’t see how INCREASING the liability for content providers for what users post on their services would help the censorship situation.  I think it would mostly encourage content providers to censor MORE since they would be more liable for lawsuits due to whatever their users do.  This Breitbart article explains that the Supreme Court judge Clarence Thomas said that he thinks such companies should be held more liable for the content that people post on them, and the people in the comment section of the article were mostly applauding him for that, presumably thinking that it would somehow be “the end of censorship.”]

In any event, certainly there is much proof about the situations of fraud that Trump had mentioned, but his claims of the courts not cooperating with him sounds strange to me.  There is a huge amount of public interest in having a fair outcome to the election, so I think Trump’s claims of “potentially not being able to get a court date in the Supreme Court,” or “lawyers refusing to work with him” is ridiculous.  Clearly he actually won the election despite his often divisive behavior, so if he in fact wants to be the winner it should be easy enough for him to prove his case to do that.  For example, Rudy Giuliani is a prominent lawyer and he obviously wants to help, so why would some other random lawyers refusing to work with Trump even be any sort of an issue?

Near the end of the interview, Trump said that he would “give 125% of his effort to the matter,” but what “effort” does it even really require on his part since he only simply needs to appoint lawyers to deal with it?  He didn’t have any problems with the effort of explaining the situation during the Fox News interview, so why would it be so difficult for him to appoint people to deal with the situation, especially when supposedly “half” of all of the political power of the United States depends on the election having a good outcome for him?!  Aren’t there quality lawyers coming out of the woodwork asking for an opportunity to work on his case?— Of course there are!  It almost seems as if Trump is trying to create an impression that Republicans inept and not able to deal even with that situation.

Trump is announcing bringing a vaccine for COVID “next week or the week after”

This video explains that Trump has said in a teleconference on Thanksgiving evening that he is going to be bringing a vaccine for COVID “next week or the week after,” with it initially being given to frontline workers, senior citizens, and U.S. troops.  Following is what he said:

“We are rounding the curve, the vaccines are being delivered literally, it will start next week, and the week after.  And it will hit the front line workers and seniors— doctors, nurses, a lot of people.  And we’re going very quickly.  Two companies already announced, a third one coming up, and a fourth and fifth one coming up soon also.  Some people have called it a ‘medical miracle,’ it could have taken four or five years to do this.  Normally, it probably would have taken four or five years, just getting it through the FDA.  We pushed it very hard.”

The video explains that his comments are coming before a December 10th meeting where the FDA will review Pfizer’s request for an “emergency use authorization” for a vaccine.

NOTE: Coronavirus is not as dangerous as people are led to believe that it is.  (See this link,  and this link  about that.)  Let’s hope that Trump is just blowing hot air about the vaccines.  Perhaps the vaccines would only be a “placebo” if he did introduce them, although of course that would also be bad for numerous reasons, especially if other more practical and effective steps would not be implemented along with the administering of the supposed “vaccines.”  Dishonestly is never actually for “the greater good,” despite the political Establishment often expecting people to rationalize that it is, such as with issues like “Black Lives Matter”-related deception and “global warming”-related deception.

Trump used to have much healthier attitudes in being opposed to vaccines, and in fact his son may have been harmed by them, but his stance has suspiciously recently changed about them.  He has also recently promised that he will “fire Fauci after the election” but if that is the case then why is he announcing the introduction of Fauci’s vaccines?

The movie “They Shall Not Grow Old” is fascinating

I saw the movie “They Shall Not Grow Old” the other day, which shows actual restored footage of the horrible conditions that soldiers went through in World War I.

Most people don’t realize that the same people who ran the world then also run it now, and they still have the same deceitful and harmful agendas (see here, and here.)  People should be frightened about everything that has recently been happening since it is all being brought by the same people who brought the previous World Wars.

“Teen Vogue” is showing Native American girls overturning a Thanksgiving table

In this video, some native American girls mention grievances about what happened to Native Americans in history, and they finish the video by abruptly overturning a table with a Thanksgiving feast on it that was laid out before them.

However, all peoples have suffered in history, and Native Americans often waged war on each other before white people even arrived.  Do those girls cook over a campfire?  What is that clothing they are wearing?  Don’t they drive in cars?

The victimhood mentality that the girls are exhibiting is a part of a leftist agenda of disempowering Native Americans as well as everyone else.  There are actual current issues concerning Native Americans though, such as dysfunctional conditions that are reinforced in the Indian reservations to ensure that they remain dependent on the government, but “Teen Vogue” is a leftist propaganda outlet so of course it would never mention that.

This John Stossel video shows the realities of that situation:

[Note: I’m a big fan of John Stossel, he’s one of the last remaining mainstream media pundits who speaks such truth, as Lou Dobbs also is.  I think it may have been counter productive for him to label that video series “Freeloaders,” but its message about the harm that is often caused by leftist government intervention is important.]