A Muslim Washington D.C Metro Transit officer Nicholas Young was arrested for providing support to ISIS terrorists after being monitored by authorities for over seven years. The go-ahead to arrest Young was given when he sent mobile messaging cards to an undercover federal agent thinking they would be used by Islamic State fighters overseas to communicate.
During the seven years under surveillance Young has engaged in activities such as:
— He had given advice to suspected terrorists while on patrol and bragged about wishing to join ISIS
— He threatened FBI agents and also assisted jihadists
— He threatened to kidnap and torture an FBI agent and sink the head of anyone who crossed him to the bottom of a lake
— He threatened to bring guns into a federal courtroom
— He traveled to Libya twice in 2011 to fight against Moammar Gaddafi.
— He gave a person working with law enforcement advice on how to travel to Syria, including how to avoid undercover agents
— He dressed up as a “Jihadi John” at a 2014 Halloween party carrying around a headless orange jumpsuit filled with paper, and he dressed up as a Nazi and carried around Nazi memorabilia
— He collected a large number of firearms including an AK-47 RPG
[Note: Updated March 7, 2020— Kahn has responded to allegations of supporting Sharia law in the past but made deceptive claims in doing so. See the end of this post for more information.]
Khizr Muazzam Khan, the U.S. Constitution touting Muslim who spoke against Donald Trump at the Democratic National Convention has been revealed to be an acknowledged expert on Islamic Sharia Law.
Sharia law dictates that men have the right to beat their wives, punishment for theft is amputation, insulting Muhammad is a crime punishable by death, rape victims need to produce four male witnesses or face adultery charges themselves, and with punishments for other infractions ranging from stonings to floggings to beheadings.
In 1983, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book where he singled out for praise a pro-jihad Muslim jurist named Allah K. Brohi, who was one of the closest advisers to Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement. In the review, Khan spoke admirably of Brohi’s interpretation of human rights even though it included the right to kill and mutilate those who violate Islamic law and the right of men to beat their wives. Khan never mentioned having any issues with Brohi’s interpretations of human rights, but instead wrote that Brohi “successfully” explains and argues his points “convincingly.” Khan also concurred in his review that human rights can only be guaranteed through the establishment of Sharia law, saying “There is no such thing as human right in the abstract.”
Brohi was the Pakistani Minister of Law and Religious Affairs at the time, and he restored the enforcement of the full range of Sharia laws to that country. Khan now claims to have immigrated to the U.S. in the 1980’s to “escape Pakistan’s Military Rule,” despite the fact that he spoke very admirably of Brohi in his review back then.
Khan also wrote another academic paper in 1983 entitled “Juristic Classification of Islamic Law,” where he states that the Quran is the “absolute authority,” and that all other juridical works must always be subordinate to Sharia law. His 13-page article was published in the Houston Journal of International Law and has been cited by dozens of Islamic law articles and has also been used in college syllabi for Islamic courses at least until 2013.
The Clinton campaign and establishment media portrait Khan as a “Pakistani-American Lawyer,” but of course they don’t mention Khan being an acknowledged expert on Sharia law.
There is no evidence that Khan has ever recanted his support for the anti-Constitional Sharia law, other than the fact that he waved a pocket constitution around during his speech at the DNC.
_______
NOTE: Khan has given a response to allegations that he has been a Sharia law supporter in the past, but in his response he does not deny what he has written about it but instead gives a vague and misleading description of what Sharia law is, and then states that he “does not stand for any Sharia law because there is no such thing.”
In this video clip from a CNN broadcast, Khan states:
“Sharia Law as we have titled it is no such thing as Sharia Law. These are laws of various Muslim countries which are hodge podge of British laws, French laws, Portuguese Laws. In there, there is tremendous discrimination of genders, which disqualifies them under the Constitution of the United States, cannot be implemented, cannot be brought. How can I be a person that has read this, I preach that I do not stand for any Sharia law because there is no such thing.”
.. In the clip after video of Khan speaking, a host chimes in appearing to reiterate what Khan just said, but while doing so she injects a claim that Khan never actually made in his statement: “.. he doesn’t stand for it, he never has stood for it, he carries around the US Constitution, he abides by the US Constitution.” If Khan didn’t actually write about Sharia law in the past as being a strong supporter, it would have been the first thing he mentioned in his statement.
Sharia Law is already being implemented in Britain where it supersedes English law for Muslims, and many American Muslims support the idea of Sharia Law being implemented in the United States.
In this video a group of Christians evangelizing at a street festival attended mostly by Muslims in Dearborn, Michigan are attacked by a large crowd of kids and teenagers who continually pelt them with bottles and rocks.
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich gave an interview on Fox News suggesting ridiculous and unworkable rhetoric in response to the recent terrorist truck attack in France that killed at least 80 people, making suggestions including testing every Muslim in the United States in order to deport those that believe in Islamic Sharia law, similar to how Donald Trump had pledged in his campaign to “ban all Muslims from entering the United States.” However, Gingrich neglected to mention the thousands of Islamic migrants that are secretively being brought into the United States from middle eastern and African countries by the Obama Administration.
Nonetheless, Gingrich did discuss the fact that many Sharia courts exist in Britain which supersede the laws of that country with Islamic laws, and he suggested that those courts should be outlawed in order for the laws of Britain to properly take precedence.
Also view an Alex Jones Infowars.com video explaining many issues with Islamic immigrants:
