Over the past few decades I’ve seen various information that claims the Moon landing was faked, but I’ve never seen anything that has really convinced me of that.
There is an argument that the astronauts couldn’t have make it through the radioactive Van Allen Belt on the way to the Moon, but other than that not much has persuaded me. All of the footage that I’ve seen from the surface of the Moon looks genuine, I think if they faked it they would have tried too hard and ended up making mistakes, which I haven’t really seen. There is a lot of “fake” faked footage, however.
I do think at least some photographs may have been doctored simply to look better, such as by putting an image of the Earth into the sky.
In any event, I don’t really care if it was faked or not. It was 50 years ago and nobody died because of it. There are more important things to be concerned about.
I would be more suspicious about the upcoming Moon and Mars missions being faked. Also I wonder if they are going to put some sort of a transvestite astronaut on those missions.
It is strange to see the uproar that has been occurring due to comments Jill Biden made complimenting the breakfast tacos that are eaten in the Texas region where she was giving a speech, where Hispanic organizations have been speaking out about what she said, and hundreds of memes have been made about it.
She said: “Raul helped build this organization with the understanding that the diversity of this community — as distinct as the bodegas of the Bronx, as beautiful as the blossoms of Miami, and as unique as the breakfast tacos here in San Antonio — is your strength.”
Obviously there was nothing inappropriate about what she said, especially since she is (supposedly) an advocate for Latin Americans.
The statement is no different than mentioning maple syrup in Canada, bratwurst in Germany, pierogies in Poland, or sushi in Japan, for example.
Also that situation is not the same as if a politician made some sort of a “watermelon” comment to African Americans for example, due to the history of issues with that.
I’m very opposed to illegal immigration, but I don’t have anything against Hispanic people.
I’m fan a genuine tacos (but not really the American-ized crunchy shell variety,) and recently I’ve been making them frequently (perhaps even too frequently) after buying a tortilla press. Real tortillas need to be prepared from scratch and eaten immediately after being made, therefore they are not able to be purchased in stores; which is somewhat similar to how pre-made pancakes can’t be bought in stores, although tortillas are not the same as pancakes of course.
I like the cookbook “Vegan Tacos: Authentic and Inspired” that explains how to make veganized versions of genuine tacos, where is also explains the large variety of chilies, salsas and condiments that are used.
Here is a “real” taco as opposed to the Americanized crunchy-shell variety. The picture is from the cookbook Vegan Tacos: Authentic and Inspired.
A Center Square article explains that people in nearly a thousand vehicles have evaded capture in Washington State so far by simply refusing to stop when the police attempt to pull them over, after a new law was passed last year restricting police from engaging in pursuit of vehicles.
House Bill 1054 which was passed last year outlaws police from engaging in pursuit unless there is “probable cause” to arrest a person in the vehicle for committing a specific violent crime or sex offense, such as murder, kidnapping, a drive-by shooting, or rape.
A Spokane County Undersheriff John Nowels said that criminals are taking advantage of the law and refusing to pull over for police, and the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) put out a statement saying that vehicle thefts have increased 93% since that law and other “police reform” laws went into effect at the end of July 2021.
WASPC Executive Director Steve Strachan said in the statement:
“The data shows what our law enforcement and communities are seeing out there every day – the word is out and criminals know what they can do under our current laws. … I have never seen criminals as emboldened as they are now. Our mayors, law enforcement, and the community asked for help, and the Legislature made the specific decision to continue to allow for brazen contempt for the law. No one wants more pursuits, which are inherently dangerous, but current law has created an atmosphere of flouting the law even on simple traffic stops. This is one example of a change in atmosphere that is, and will continue to be, unacceptable and dangerous to public safety. Fleeing in a vehicle should not be a get-out-of-jail-free card.”
Legislation that would have eased such restrictions on police pursuits failed to pass during this year’s legislative session.
Ridiculously, Democrat Senator Jesse Johnson who was a sponsor of the original Bill 1054 is still applauding the law despite its obvious consequences, saying in a March interview, “I just do not believe pursuits in a 21st century policing system are needed.” [Note: Don’t ever vote for a Democrat. Both parties are controlled by the same people and Republicans are bad too, but they are the lesser evil.]
A University of Washington study says that 30 people died in pursuits in Washington between 2015 and 2021, with “nearly half of them bystanders or passengers in the fleeing vehicle.” [Note: Why didn’t it occur to the makers of the study to distinguish between the number of bystanders and passengers?]
This Breitbart article explains the results of a poll that says abortion laws will be a factor in determining where many people will choose to live.
Results of polls generally should not be trusted (especially Axios polls), but I think it is reasonable to assume that many people think the way that the poll says. I think colleges in states that institute total abortion bans will see a decline in enrollment, for example.
Breitbart is a good source of information, but is interesting to see the comment section of the article where many of the people are celebrating the idea of “liberals moving out of their states” due to the implementation of extreme abortion laws. (That is a phenomenon I have detailed in this article, explaining how such attitudes are being exploited by the global elite.)
However, most people won’t be responding to abortion bans that they don’t agree with by “moving away.” States that implement total abortion bans will constantly be portrayed as “backwards” in the media, liberal activists will become extremely energized in those states, and many conservatives don’t support such bans as well. All of such factors will empower Democrat politicians who will be run as supposedly “reasonable alternatives,” which will soon turn such states into Democrat ones, perhaps before many of such bans are even instituted.
Despite superficial appearances, there isn’t any real “conservative revival” actually happening, but rather it is a distraction that is calculated to be a steam valve, as well as to cause conflict for ultimately reinforcing the country continuing to veer to the left until it is finally destroyed as planned. Conservative politicians who are touting extreme approaches such as total abortion bans are leading their constituents off of a cliff.
Conservatives should be paying attention to how the corrupt mainstream media and leftist media are portraying the abortion situation in order to gauge how most people in the country are interpreting and responding to what is happening.
In my opinion, the best course of action is to implement moderate abortion restrictions such as heartbeat bills along with later term exceptions for medical necessity, where that along with advocating for women to choose not to have any abortions would be the most effective and sustainable approach.
Unfortunately, many Republican candidates will be running on a platform of total abortion bans despite the fact that many of their constituents don’t actually agree with it, where such candidates will tout themselves as being “a righteous relief from the corruption of Democrats,” despite the fact that they are almost always a part of the same corrupt system themselves.
Also many vocal well-meaning pro-life activists may only support politicians who advocate for total bans because conceding to anything less is not technically “pro-life,” which is a situation that the political establishment will also be exploiting.
Not enough people being aware that all political parties and essentially all politicians are controlled by the same small group of global elite, as well as not enough people being aware of the harmful plans of those elite is the most significant cause of the problems in the United States and the rest of the world.
This map shows the current availability of abortions in the United States. Obviously many late term surgical abortions without any medical necessity are in fact happening in the states that allow it. (But for some reason according to a gynecologist Debbie McNabb it is a “complete falsehood” that abortions up until the moment of birth are happening in the states with no gestation limit.)
I saw this dishonest article on the Yahoo website that originated on the “Business Insider” website that makes numerous false claims about the abortion issue, saying that “abortion on demand” and “abortion up until birth” are “terrible lies” and “complete falsehoods.”
The article interviews a retired gynecologist Debbie McNabb who said that medical emergencies may prompt a doctor to abort a fetus for the mother’s safety, but “it’s not the same as abortion that’s allowed up to the moment of birth.” However her claim is not true at all, in some states abortion is allowed up until the moment of birth, where it is allowed whenever the mother simply wishes it to be done.
She then dismissed the idea that any woman would do that on a whim and even said it is a complete falsehood:
“Like, ‘oh, I’m going to file my fingernails and smoke a cigarette, and then I’ll go in when I’m in labor and have an abortion.’ That’s just crazy, but that’s what the Republicans are saying, ‘Abortion up to the moment of birth’ is a complete falsehood.”
The article then gives CDC statistics saying that about 80% of abortions happen before 9 weeks gestation, and about 93% happen at before 13 weeks gestation.
It is true that later surgical abortions and partial-birth abortions aren’t as common, but it is certainly a lie to say that it is a “complete falsehood” that women don’t have such abortions on a whim. There are a lot of crazy people out in the world, especially in the states that allow late term abortions.
Most pro-choice activists want late term abortions to be allowed in cases that are just for the sake of convenience. For example, in 2021 the Democrats attempted to pass legislation known as the “Abortion on Demand Until Birth Act,” which imposes on-demand abortion until birth, removes nearly all pro-life protections for the unborn, and abolishes laws preventing late-term abortions.
Personally I support the availability of morning-after pills if they are taken in the presence of a doctor, and the availability of later surgical abortions for legitimate medical reasons.
The end of the article warns about supposed consequences of voting for Republicans in the upcoming election, saying that Republicans intend to write legislation declaring fertilized eggs as persons and instituting a nation-wide abortion ban. Unfortunately, perhaps many of such candidates will actually have such an agenda. Since the same political Establishment controls all sides, obviously such an extreme agenda would be a calculated move on its part in order the stifle the potential of a massive exodus of Democrat voters over to the Republican side that would happen otherwise. See this article talking about such issues.
I wasn’t paying much attention to the abortion issue previously because I assumed that it is one that is well-covered due to it having large amounts of advocates on both sides.
I also made a somewhat similar assumption about Covid and vaccines, where I assumed that since that issue isn’t even a matter of a “difference of opinion” but rather just the “accuracy of the facts” which can easily be clarified— combined with the fact that there isn’t even anything that is non-PC about communicating about issues with it— and the fact that even the official government sources quietly detail the truth of the actual non-severity of the Covid virus and the uselessness and the harmfulness of the vaccines— as well as the situation of enormous amounts of people being reported to be harmed by the vaccines— that it would all naturally lead to people doing something about the situation since there are eight billion people on the Earth and it effects everyone. However, amazingly that has not been the case, although many people have been at least reporting about the situation. (And like I mentioned before, I suspect that the harm that is reported to be caused by the vaccines may be often somehow a hoax, because I cannot imagine how people would continue to allow that to happen otherwise. At least I hope it is a hoax.) See these articles for more information about Covid and the associated vaccines.
I saw this meme yesterday, which led to a me thinking of a concept of an “abortion court” that is comprised of a panel of doctors who would decide if an abortion can be allowed to happen or not (at least for later-term surgical abortions.) That way, abortions could happen in the rare cases of women needing them for legitimate medical reasons, and it would not allow non-legitimate reasons being used as a loophole such as “she is depressed because of the pregnancy,” for example. The proceedings of the panels should then also be made available for scrutiny by people in the local communities.
Obviously many other people must have had this idea as well, so I’m surprised that I’ve never heard of it before. Why haven’t large amounts of people already been advocating for such a solution since it would undoubtedly be a very effective solution to the problem?
___
Also speaking of vaccines and memes, many people might be familiar with this meme of a distressed woman and a cat. I always assumed that the image was chosen because she was upset about something ridiculous, such as due to someone “misgendering” someone or something, and I also thought the meme was funny because it has a picture of a cat sitting at a plate of vegetables.
However, the reality of the meme is that she is upset about a serious situation related to her ex-husband who is now deceased, therefore it is inappropriate for the image to be used in such a manner.
[Note: July 13— I have directly linked to a video about Islamization at a New York school. July 2, 2022— I have added the section “The concept of ‘abortion courts’ comprised of panels of doctors would be an effective solution with the abortion issue”, and updated the section talking about issues with the separation of church and state.]
States such as Louisiana, Idaho, and Georgia are attempting to implement extreme legislation including outlawing contraceptives, sentencing women who get abortions with life in prison, and sentencing women who attempt to leave their state for abortions with prison time.
The topic of abortion is a divisive one, and recent events of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe vs. Wade has been causing a lot of unrest in the country.
While many conservatives agree with not allowing any type of abortions in their states, they should be aware that the political elite has an agenda of exploiting such abortion bans for nefarious purposes, as this article explains along with other related issues.
Most people don’t understand that almost all politicians are secretly controlled by one small group of global elite individuals, and they also don’t understand the harmful agendas that those elite are implementing.
Two strategies are being implemented by the global elite to nefariously exploit the abortion issue. Their first strategy it to maximize the stratification of the U.S. states in order to “divide and conquer” the population of the country, and their second strategy is to run conservative candidates who are intended to appear as extreme as possible in order to empower harmful leftist agendas.
Both of the strategies are being implemented with the intention of hastening the destruction of the U.S. in order to usher in elite’s planned coming New World Order, which will be a totalitarian communist “post-industrial feudal system.”
This article details the realities of those harmful strategies, and it makes suggestions about how to circumvent those situations.
___
What does the political Establishment have planned for the U.S. and the rest of the world?
Most voters do not understand the reality of the “false left-right paradigm” where almost all politicians are controlled by the same small group of global elite individuals.
Most voters also aren’t aware of the elite’s agenda of implementing a “New World Order,” where almost all of humanity is planned to be subverted in a totalitarian communist “post-industrial feudal system”— under which almost all of the people on the Earth are planned to be depopulated, impoverished, dumbed down, and made to be as dependent on the global elite as possible in a permanent underclass.
See the articles and videos at this link for more information about these issues.
___
Essentially all politicians are controlled by the same global elite
Despite the fact that many conservative politicians claim to be opposed to abortion, the reality is that many of them don’t actually care very much about that matter, but rather they are simply doing what they are told to do by the global elite.
The “false left-right paradigm” is all-encompassing in politics. Essentially all world leaders and most lower ranking politicians serve the same group of global elite individuals, where such politicians are kept in line though blackmail by being required to compromise themselves by engaging in illegal and highly taboo activity including even pedophilia and murder.
Almost all of the politicians in the United States are secretively or secretly Freemasons who are required to do as they are told. Therefore most of even the most genuine-seeming conservative Republicans are essentially just playing a role; it is not only the more obvious RINOs (“Republicans In Name Only”) who are doing that.
See this article that details many aspects of these issues, and also see this video where the activist Altiyan Childs explains issues with Freemasonry.
___
Total abortion bans in conservative states are causing harmful stratification of the U.S., as has been strategized by the global elite
I think most conservative voters who support total abortion bans are well-meaning, but the conservative politicians who are bringing those bans more often than not have nefarious motivations.
The implementation of 100% abortion bans in conservative states will undoubtedly lead to extreme stratification in the U.S., where many liberals will end up relocating to and accumulating in leftist states such as on the west coast, where sadly abortions will continue to be allowed up until the moment of birth. (And some of such states are even attempting to institute abortions after birth! See this article, this article, and this article.)
Many conservative voters will assume that not allowing even the use of morning-after pills in their states will help in their cause of prompting liberals whose values they disagree with to leave for other states, and their “conservative” politicians will be more than willing to accommodate doing that, however most of such politicians will actually be doing it for nefarious ulterior motives that the conservative voters do not realize, as the following points explain:
1. The liberals who will be prompted to move to other states will of course still be living in the United States, and many will also be having extreme later-term surgical abortions.
2. The stratification of the country that will be occurring due to liberals and conservatives concentrating in their own states will significantly hasten the impending demise of the U.S., due to regions of the country increasingly becoming divided along ideological lines. In particular, the political Establishment that covertly controls all sides (such as by controlling essentially all politicians and the media) will continue to do whatever is possible to stoke hatred and division within the country, which will almost certainly also include staging false flag attacks meant to be blamed on the opposing sides.
3. Therefore, conservative voters who will initially attempt to “liberate their states from liberals” by prompting them to move elsewhere in such a manner are actually being tricked into doing that for the purpose of hastening the destruction of their own states as well as the entire United States— After which the U.S. won’t even exist anymore, and with almost everyone being enslaved by the global elite who have a long history of covertly subjugating large regions of the Earth with totalitarian communism, such as they had done in Russia and China.
(Also see the this video detailing many aspects of the phenomena of the stratification related to the abortion issue.)
___
The global elite are also implementing agendas that are intended to be interpreted as being too extreme by most voters, being calculated to empower leftist agendas
1. The political Establishment can turn Republican states into Democrat ones when it wishes to do so, by simply having the candidates on all sides strategically either attract or repel potential voters in order to acquire whatever results they are trying to achieve.
2. Essentially all liberal voters, and also many of the conservative voters living in conservative states will be put off by total abortion bans, along with such voters also being put off by whatever other factors that the global elite will engineer in order to sufficiently empower leftist candidates.
3. The political Establishment will then run what will appear to be “reasonable” liberal candidates as an alternative, however those candidates will also quietly be bringing the most harmful of leftist agendas that are already in advanced stages in the Democrat states— thus advancing the global elite’s agenda of destroying the United States, exactly as in the previous scenario.
[Note: I had envisioned this scenario a few years ago and I wrote this article about it.]
___
The case for the continued legal availability of “medication abortion” (meaning “morning-after pills”)
[Note: Admittedly my approach detailed in this section is not a “purist” one, but in my opinion it is most effective for the actual reduction of the amount of suffering that is caused by the abortion issue.
I respect the intentions of pro-life purists as long as they don’t actually have ulterior motives for espousing that view. Pro-life purists are very welcome to be involved with my organizations. Obviously they can personally disagree with the views I am advancing here, and I will also present their opinions even though my opinion is different.
On the other hand, I definitely don’t agree with views that are too much in the other direction, such as supporting partial birth abortions. My organizations will speak out against those agendas.
I previously mentioned being interested in the idea of creating an article that summarizes reasons to be pro-life, along with an article that summarizes reasons to be pro-choice. I’m still interested in doing that, and I would also be giving my own opinions in those articles which will be opposed to later term abortions.]
While I think any abortion is a tragedy at any stage of a pregnancy and women should always choose not to do it, I do think that the use of a “morning-after pill” is very preferable to later term surgical abortions, and it should be legal to do so. While the unborn child is a life even when it is only a cluster of a few cells, the cluster of cells cannot feel pain at that stage so I think the trade-off of allowing abortions at that point is worth it. I do agree that some women routinely using morning-after pills simply as “birth control” is an abomination, but I think the use of such pills should still be legal nonetheless.
I recently saw a segment in this horrifying video that illustrates how later term abortions are performed, where it explains how they use forceps to tear the living child apart limb-by-limb. I can’t imagine how someone could support that being legal unless it genuinely is a case of the mother’s life being in danger.
I agree with not allowing later-term surgical abortions, such as after when a heartbeat can be detected for example. I saw a video where a woman was debating that issue and she was arguing that sometimes women don’t realize that they are pregnant until after a few months, but I don’t have sympathy for that over the child’s life in such a case. If a woman is sexually active then she should be monitoring if she is pregnant or not.
Many feminist-types have been conditioned during their entire lives to be absolutists about being pro-choice at all stages of the pregnancy, even up until birth, and that situation is being exploited by the global elite in order to trick such people into also supporting other harmful leftist agendas.
Of course it is great for women to be strict about not having any abortions whatsoever when they are making that decision for themselves, but I think it is a bad idea to not legally allow the use of morning-after pills that significantly reduce the amount of traumatic surgical abortions that would otherwise occur.
I saw this meme for the first time today. I’m surprised that I’ve never seen activists use this phrase before, I think it is a very effective one. (I’m sure that many people think I am wrong for advocating that morning after pills should legally be allowed to be used, but in my opinion I think doing so is the most effective strategy for reducing the total amount of harm that is caused by abortions under the circumstances, as well as for the other reasons I am explaining in this article.)
___
What is the difference between “medication abortions” and “emergency contraception”?
A “medication abortion” is when a patient takes a drug called mifepristone (also called “RU-486”), followed by a second drug called misoprostol to end a pregnancy rather than using a surgical abortion procedure.
“Emergency contraception” is different than medication abortion, where it prevents or delays one of the hormonal surges that triggers ovulation (the release of the eggs), thus “preventing” but not “ending” a pregnancy. Shockingly (or rather not shockingly, unfortunately), some politicians have been attempting to outlaw even that!
[Note: I would never support a politician who advocates for outlawing even contraception. If a couple is opposed to using contraception for whatever reason then they should just choose not to use it. I think people who want contraception to be illegal are ultimately “pro-abortion” whether they admit it or not.
I usually equate overly fundamentalist approaches with a person running onto a busy freeway with an assumption that their religion will automatically protect them from harm.]
___
The concept of “abortion courts” comprised of panels of doctors would be an effective solution with the abortion issue
[Note: This section was added July 2, 2022.]
I saw this meme yesterday, which led to me thinking of a concept of an “abortion court” that is comprised of a panel of doctors who would decide if an abortion can be allowed to happen or not (at least for later-term surgical abortions.) That way, abortions could happen in the rare cases of women needing them for legitimate medical reasons, and it would not allow non-legitimate reasons being used as a loophole such as “she is depressed because of the pregnancy,” for example. The proceedings of the panels should then also be made available for scrutiny by people in the local communities.
Obviously many other people must have had this idea as well, but I’m surprised that I’ve never heard of it before. I wonder why a lot of people haven’t already been advocating for that since it would undoubtedly be a very effective solution to the problem.
___
Issues with “medication abortions” (meaning “morning-after pills”)
[Note: I realize that many conservatives are opposed to the use of morning-after pills, but I think such people would be interested in reading his section anyway to become better informed about the specifics of the situation with it. I offer my opinions in this section as well.]
— “Medication abortions” are induced when a patient takes a drug called mifepristone (that is also called “RU-486”), followed by a second drug called misoprostol to end her pregnancy rather than going through a surgical abortion procedure. Over half of abortions in the U.S. are performed that way.
[Note: I’m surprised to hear that only half of the abortions are preformed that way. It is possible to have abortions in that manner until ten weeks into the pregnancy, therefore I wonder what is causing so many women to wait longer than that— where reportedly HALF of them are instead having traumatic later-term surgical abortions. I hope that statistic is not correct. In any event it doesn’t change my opinion that later term surgical abortions should not be allowed. I don’t agree with the argument that later abortions must be available because women don’t always know they are pregnant right away, for example. If a woman is sexually active then she should be proactive about checking if she is pregnant.]
— The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the abortion drug mifepristone in the year 2000, but until very recently the FDA mandated that patients must get it at a doctor’s office, clinic or hospital.
— Due to the Covid situation, in December 2021 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) permanently removed the requirement to dispense those abortion drugs in person, where people can now simply have the drugs mailed to them after an online video chat, which is a system known as “telemedicine.”
[Note: I think it is horrifying that they are now allowing those drugs to simply be mailed to whoever requests them, despite their potential to be used to kill the children of unknowing pregnant women. I think it is highly suspicious that the FDA (which also pushes vaccines that are proven to be useless and deadly) has permanently removed the requirement of taking such pills in the presence of a doctor.
It is essential to re-institute the requirement that such pills can only be dispensed in person by a physician due to such a danger. I can imagine some people being opposed to that suggestion, where they may argue that people in “remote locations” need to have the pills mailed to them for example, but I think that trade-off isn’t worth it and some sort of an alternative could be figured out in such cases anyway.]
— The state of Indiana bans medication abortions at ten weeks, and Texas at seven weeks.
— Thirty-two states require that only physicians can dispense the abortion pills rather than people such as nurse practitioners.
— Nineteen states require that the dispensing clinician is in the patient’s physical presence, which essentially bans “telemedicine” abortion. [Note: I think this is very important, as I am mentioning elsewhere in this section.]
— Before the Supreme Court ruling, 13 states had “trigger laws” written to implement abortion laws as soon as Roe vs. Wade was overturned.
— At least 26 states are expected to pass new abortion laws due to the Supreme Court ruling. Such states have so far not distinguished between surgical and medical abortions, therefore indicating that they will also likely ban medication abortions.
— Some states will ban all abortions almost entirely, while others will ban all abortions at six weeks to 15 weeks.
— The Democrat U.S. Senator Minnesota Tina Smith has introduced a bill that would ensure that “telemedicine” abortions would still be available in states where abortions are still allowed.
— It is not legal for a medical professional to prescribe pills via telemedicine to a woman in a state where they are illegal; however it is legal for a woman to travel to a state where telemedicine is legal, have an online telemedicine visit, and then have the medication mailed to an address in that state.
— From the article:
GenBioPro Inc, a company that sells mifepristone, has already challenged Mississippi’s restrictions on prescribing abortion pills via telemedicine by arguing that they are ‘preempted’ by the FDA, meaning that the federal approval of the drug overrides any state law. There has not been a ruling in that case, which is pending in Mississippi federal court.
…
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland appeared to express support for that position in a statement on the Supreme Court’s June 24 ruling, saying that states ‘may not ban mifepristone based on disagreement with the FDA’s expert judgment about its safety and efficacy.’
Mississippi has argued that FDA approval cannot overcome the Supreme Court’s rulings granting states authority to regulate abortions.
[Note: I think this is an important case. While I support the availability of medication abortions, I strongly disagree with it being allowed to be available through the mail via telemedicine. I hope that the FDA loses the case, but I also hope that Mississippi will allow medication abortions to be available via visits to a doctor.]
— People can also acquire abortion pills from other countries, but the practice is not legal. However state authorities are saying they have no effective way of policing such orders from foreign doctors and pharmacies. [Note: I think those drugs should be a controlled substance and they could use drug-sniffing dogs to enforce not allowing them to be mailed to people, just as they are presumably doing with other illicit drugs.]
___
Related Topic: The Supreme Court has been reversing previous rulings reinforcing the separation of church and state [Additionally updated July 2, 2022]
[Note: July 1, 2022— I have re-written this section.]
I also notice that the Supreme Court has been reversing rulings about the separation of church and state. For example they recently ruled in favor of a high school football coach who was fired for holding prayer sessions on the field during games.
Supporters of allowing religion in public schools point out that The First Amendment of the Constitution does not “prohibit” religion, but rather it does not “impede” it. The Constitution was written to guarantee people their God-given rights, and it was also written based on Christian values even though Christianity was not specifically mentioned.
While I’m all for the propagation of Christian values, I do think the separation of church and state is an essential tenant of a free society. If people want their religion to be a part of their school then they should go to a private school that caters to it, otherwise the public schools will soon be overrun with Islamic or even literally Satanic agendas, which is actually the real motivation for the precedents that are being set with the recent rulings regarding Christianity.
[Note: Updated July 13, 2022— As an example of unintended consequences of the rulings for Christians, today I found this video explaining the issue of a Saratoga, New York school district setting rooms aside for Muslim students to leave class to pray during schools hours. (Note I have linked to the actual video.)]
The political Establishment is now attempting to make Christians think that it would only be a matter of allowing religion in the schools to fix the problems of the degradation of society, but I think it would be more effective to focus on other avenues for bringing Christian values back, such as raising awareness about the political Establishment being the most egregious source of the degradation of such values in the first place.
___
Conclusion
The abortion issue is one that the global elite is exploiting to cause conflict and division in order to achieve their nefarious goals.
The fact that very few voters understand what the “false left / right paradigm” is, and the fact that very few voters understand what the global elite’s real agendas are results in enabling the elite to easily implement their harmful agendas on the United States and the rest of the world.
Despite the issues with it, I’m glad that Roe vs. Wade was overturned to give abortion decisions to the states, which I think will significantly reduce the amount of abortions that will be performed.
I respect the views of pro-life purists, but I do not think it is practical to ban all abortions. I am in favor of banning later term abortions, however. All abortions are a tragedy, but I think if an abortion is to happen, it should happen as soon in the pregnancy as possible.
Most voters will not support total abortion bans, and conservatives attempting to force that issue will result in many Republican politicians losing elections, thus resulting in empowering harmful leftist candidates— all of which has been strategized to occur by the global elite.
If more people become better informed about the harmful motives and methods the global elite, then they will be able to make better choices, which will result in the people of the world ultimately being more healthy and happy.
I’ve recently become aware of a YouTube channel called “A Call for An Uprising” that talks about issues with the Illuminati and many of its agendas such as Covid and the associated vaccines. It covers a fairly wide range of topics.
Their information that I’ve seen so far is informative. The view counts on their videos are relatively low, but I think it is likely due to YouTube shadow banning the videos.
[Note: I don’t like the opening animation that they show before their videos. I think it is rather blasphemous to Christianity despite having pro-Christianity intentions. The animation had put me off from posting their information previously.
Additional note: As far as I’ve seen their videos contain good information, although they seem to contain some rather large gaps in the issues that they talk about, such as apparently not mentioning issues with immigration or Islam. I think talking about both of those topics are crucial to the big picture. Of course it is their prerogative to do what they want to do, however. (Note if people are uncomfortable with my organizations talking about all such issues they should choose not to be involved with them, I’m interested in what people think but it can’t be a lopsided approach.)]
This video explains likely ulterior motives of Roe v. Wade being overturned, talking about how the issue is almost certainly being exploited for the purpose of polarizing the country as a part of destroying the U.S. in order to usher in the New World Order. Of course none of the Supreme Court judges would have been appointed if they wouldn’t be doing exactly what they are being told to do by the Global Elite. The video also speculates about ulterior motives of the Court concurrently allowing more people access to guns, but I do think it is good that more people will be able to acquire guns to protect themselves nonetheless.
[Note: I think such situations can be diffused and even changed if more people are made to be better informed. I think many leftists can be woken up to how dishonest and corrupt their side is if they are communicated with properly— it is not really a “difference of opinion” between left and right but rather mostly one of truthfulness and health. Many people who assume that they support leftist views simply haven’t been paying enough attention to what is happening and thus they are uninformed or misinformed.]
[Note: July 2, 2022— I have changed the text of this article by removing quotes.]
In this video Alex Jones explains how the pro-choice movement is literally full of Satan worshipers who perform human sacrifices, and he explains how some states are starting to institute even POST-birth abortions.
A typical ridiculous “Handmaids Tail” analogy that feminists often attempt to make. The Handmaids Tale is actually likely an allegory for Islam, although most leftists are not aware of that or they don’t care.
The U.S. Supreme Court has overturned the 50 year old Roe vs. Wade ruling, thus allowing states to make their own laws about abortions.
Leftist media outlets such as NPR and all of the typical Establishment celebrities have been trying to portrait the decision as if abortion has been outlawed in the U.S. altogether, and leftist groups are going crazy over the issue— undoubtedly all in an attempt to help entrench the support of naive leftists for Democrat candidates who also support other harmful anti-American agendas such as open borders.
Abortion was never a constitutional right as the right to bear arms is, yet many leftists such as the Masonic Boule associated Mayor of Chicago Lori Lightfoot have been trying to dishonestly draw a parallel between the two issues, falsely claiming that the Supreme Court is being hypocritical by recently overriding state laws that ban guns while also now allowing states to decide for themselves about abortion.
[Update: I saw this “Unicorn Riot” article that lies in its first sentence claiming that abortion is a “constitutional right,” which it is not. Joe Biden also made the same dishonest claim in his speech about the issue.
This article explains that such people attempt to claim that the Fourth Amendment’s “protection of privacy” means that “abortion is protected by the constitution,” which obviously is not a valid interpretation. Leftists lie about everything.]
And another almost certainly Boule member Elie Mystal said on MSNBC, “At a basic level, if you want rights in this country under this conservative Supreme Court, you’d better be a cis-hetero White man or an Uzi. Because those are the two things that this court believes, have rights.” However of course everything he said is untrue.
.jpg){kind=link}