About ten members of an anti-Islamization group in Australia “Party for Freedom” walked into a church in Australia on a recent Sunday morning dressed as Muslims and disrupted the service in the middle of the sermon by playing Islamic music while pretending to pray on their knees in front of the surprised parishioners.
Father Rod Bower reassured the parishioners and the group soon left the church with one of them saying, “Do not promote Islam.”
The Godsford Angelican Church at the NSW Central Coast is known for being opposed to Australia’s policy of processing refugees offshore at detention centers on Nauru and Manus Islands rather than immediately allowing them into the country.
Bower said the group “terrorized” the congregation and also “violated our sacred space.” Some of the Parishioners appeared to be amused but Bower said others were “deeply traumatized.” Bower later posted on his Facebook page that it was an example of “right-wing terrorism.”
The Party for Freedom leader Nick Folkes told the Daily Mail Australia that he believes in freedom of speech, and said that he believes Islam is anti-democratic and anti-freedom and has no place in Australia.
Much of the information in this article is summarized from this CNN news story:
Recently an Imam bought a 135 acre parcel of land 40 miles southeast of Atlanta in Newtown county to build a large mosque complex including a park, housing, cemetery, and an Islamic school, all across the street from a Baptist church with an adjacent cemetery.
Initially he was able to obtain approval from the county, but eventually word got out about the plans and caused an uproar in the local community.
In response to the uproar, county officials passed a moratorium on the construction of all houses of worship to further study issues with its impact on the community under the guise of zoning issues.
Edward Ahmed Mitchell, the executive director of the Georgia chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said, “This wouldn’t have happened if this was a Protestant church. … This won’t stand up in the court of public opinion, much less a public court.”
Towns frequently resort to using zoning rules to stop new Islamic facilities from coming to their areas, and the Obama administration has been forcing Mosques on such communities that do not want them through legislative actions from the Department of Justice.
Over 300 people attended a pair of town meetings voicing their opinions about it.
A resident Joy Thomas said, “As United States citizens we don’t need people that don’t want to go by our laws. What are they actually going to be doing there at the mosque?”
CAIR says it has documented over 40 cases where local communities were opposed to proposals for Mosques between 2009 and 2015, and it has documented 40 incidents in which mosque proposals faced interference from communities.
CAIR is a Muslim advocacy group in the United States that is known for its political activism among Muslims in America, having an innocuous facade while also being notorious for its connections to Muslim extremism and terrorist groups. The website http://www.anti-cair-net.org/ is a comprehensive resource documenting issues with the organization.
Germany hasn’t been able to follow through on hundreds of deportations because of migrants engaging in tactics that make them not suited for taking flights.
— Germany has taken 1.5 million refugees since the start of 2015, and it is trying to deport a greater amount of rejected Asylum seekers than it previously has been.
— According to Germany’s interior ministry, over 330 deportations have been abandoned since January 2015 due to migrants shouting, refusing to fasten their seat belts, or telling the pilot that they are being taken against their will.
— Another 108 avoided deportation because they were sick, and an additional 160 were refused by the airlines for undisclosed reasons.
— Maiziere said in June that a significant increase in deportations would only occur if the procedural shortcomings are fixed, according to Deutche Welle.
— Authorities struggle with deportations of convicted criminals as well. A recent deportation of only three migrants back to Guinea cost $138,000 because they were considered to be violent, requiring them to travel on a private chartered plane. Also see the article: “Germany Drops $138k To Deport Three Africans On A Private Jet.”
Description: “Islam faith school in Turkey. The children are taught the militant hand waving while singing an innocuous song called Ciao Bello. They round it all off with a lot of chanting ‘allahu akbar’ while doing the militant fist waving. Very clever way to indoctrinate children.”
“Great Mogul and His Court Returning From the Great Mosque At Dehli, India” by Edwin Lord Weeks. Image from Wikipedia.
The following information has been summarized from this Islam-Watch article by T. Omar Moros:
A writing known as “Muhammad’s Final Sermon” which is often used by Islamists and apologists to portrait Muhammad as having a universal and peaceful attitude toward other cultures has been revealed to be a pseudo-Islamic hoax that had likely been written and passed off as being genuine hundreds of years ago by an anonymous Indian cleric who wanted to “enhance Islam.”
The most popular quote from the sermon is as follows:
“All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over a black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action …”(See the full text of the writing.)
The text surfaced when it was translated into English by Syed F. H. Faizi in 1991, leading to it becoming very popular while assumed to be real despite the fact that it was not legitimately sourced. However, research by T. Omar Moros shows the origin of the writing is likely due to it being forged by an anonymous cleric in India sometime during the three centuries of British colonialism in order to “enhance Islam” to help “undermine the racial, ethnic and caste systems that oppressed them.”
“[Faizi’s] version—oddly, there are more than one—is being used today to cast Islam as a universal, peaceful faith, instead of—as critics argue—a violent, deceitful, Arab-centric ideology used by powerful clerics to control the masses.”
…
“I was finally able to track down the origin of the translation from a cryptic ‘Faizi 145’ reference; the only one among dozens of postings I checked. … Yet, even Faizi does not provide his source. Highly unusual, considering how popular this version is with modern Muslims.”
“Faizi gives us as close to a source as he could when he describes in the introduction to Sermons how he translated and published a collection of obscure writings into English…”
“[Faizi wrote about his translation:] ‘… They were not available in the form of Khutbas but have been derived from various books of Ahadith and history. .. the authenticity of the texts thereof is still doubted by ulema. …’”
“In other words, Faizi said ‘derived’ sermons from various unnamed books not accepted by the ulema (scholarly Muslim clerics). He does not know the original sources, but welcomes readers to help in his search. As a reader of Faizi, I’m happy to take a swag at it. …”
[Moros’ theory is as follows:] “It is well known that over the centuries, especially on the periphery of Islamic civilization, in places like India, a great deal of bogus religious material was generated. Even the Caliphate is known to have generated many bogus ahadith to legitimize its political claims. For more than three centuries while Britain ruled India, anti-colonial Indians, including Muslims, were very interested in finding significant sources of inspiration that would undermine the racial, ethnic and caste systems that oppressed them. This era also saw the black/white racial dynamic and the Arab identity being introduced into language. It is, therefore, no great leap to surmise that an inspired young Muslim cleric would decide to enhance Islam, by writing a bit of historical fiction in order to achieve a practical result. Who in pre-Internet, pre-electric India would know? A complete collection of authenticated ahadith was as rare as a magic carpet in colonial India. It wouldn’t be the first time someone wrote phony Islamic tracts; not by a long shot. Maybe our cleric even thought, ‘Well, if I must be Muslim (apostates are killed), then I’ll make it more suitable to me’–the old ‘change from the inside’ strategy at work.”
“In lieu of hard evidence, I believe this scenario is more plausible than the fish tales Islamists routinely employ to explain ahadith. … At least two other versions are also used, but do not mention race at all.”
…
“Islamists, in keeping with their insecure habit of finding Muslims at the root of every major innovation, including the airplane and golf, market the Last Sermon to the left as the world’s first Charter on Social Justice. Yet the version they most promote, without sources, effectively dates to 1991. In the end, it doesn’t matter when it was published, or if it is a fraud. The proof is in the headlines. Today, as this is written, Hamas killed the leader of a rival jihadist group, a Muslim in Ohio threatened to kill his apostate daughter, the Taliban claimed responsibility for bombing NATO’s Kabul headquarters, and sharia law has failed to deliver equality and accountability to northern Nigeria. Slow day—is it Ramadan?”
The following information is summarized from this Infowars article:
A 29 year old Muslim man in Australia on a temporary visa stabbed a 21 year old British woman Mia Ayliffe-Chung to death and seriously injured a British man at a backpacker’s hostel while shouting “Allahu Akbar,” however local police only attributed the attack to “mental health issues,” saying the attack was not about race or religion.
Such claims by authorities concealing Islam as the cause of the violence is commonplace:
— Last week in Strasbourg, France, a Jewish rabbi was stabbed by a man shouting “Allahu Akbar,” with police dismissing the attacker as being “mentally ill.”
— Earlier this month, six people where stabbed during an attack in London, with the police calling the attacker “mentally ill” despite the fact that he was a devout Muslim who supported various Islamic terrorist groups.
— On August 7, two policewoman in Brussels were wounded when they were attacked by a man wielding a machete shouting “Allahu Akbar,” with a police spokesman saying man had “mental health problems.”
The following information is summarized from this Star article:
A study by a Thomas Quiggin, a former Canadian intelligence analyst, and Saied Shoaaib, a journalist originally from Egypt, shows that many Mosques and Islamic schools in Canada are espousing extremist teachings.
The authors of the study entitled “Lovers of the Death? Islamist Extremism in Mosques and Schools” say that what worries them the most is not so much the presence of the extremist literature, but the fact that they found nothing but such writings in several libraries.
They say the amount of openly available material and their analysis of social media postings confirm their views that many Canadians, including its politicians, are turning a blind eye to the dangers. They also warned that many young Canadians have become radicalized to violence.
The Canadian government will soon announce details of its creation of a National Office of Counter-Radicalization for conducting research and coordinating actives in Canada.
Last year the Senate defense and security committee issued a report saying that a number of foreign-trained Imams had been spreading extremist Islamic ideologies in Canada. It called for the government to work with Muslim communities to “investigate the options that are available for the training and certification of imams in Canada.”
The report was not supported by liberal senators on the committee and it was denounced by the National Council of Canadian Muslims as stigmatizing and failing to offer effective solutions for the challenge of violent extremism.
A study by the polling group Ipsos Mori shows that the French hold more anti-immigration feelings than their neighboring countries, with only 11 percent thinking immigration had a positive impact on their country, compared to 18 percent in Germany and 20 percent in Spain.
Also, 38 percent thought closing the borders would be a good idea, and 67 percent thought that terrorists are waiting in the country disguised as migrants.
The study took place between June 24 and July 8, weeks before the terrorist attacks in Nice and Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray.
The following information is summarized from this Breitbart article:
National Parliament of Germany (Budenstag) member Erika Steinbach and Iranian-born pastor Mahin Mousapour held a press conference this past Monday calling for much stronger sanctions against Muslims who abuse Christians in Germany.
Following are points made by Ms. Mousapour, who converted to Christianity more than 25 years ago:
— She criticized Germany for granting Islam “too much respect,” highlighting the fact that Christians suffer violence, harassment, and death threats in migrant lodgings.
— Christians living in migrant housing are often told they are “impure as a dog” and deserve death for rejecting Islam.
— In migrant housing toys of Christian children are often destroyed, Christian asylum seekers are told not only to wash their own dishes after eating but also that they must clean the entire kitchen as it would otherwise be “unclean.” Many Muslim asylum seekers call all Christians “unclean.” Church services are held in secret, bibles and crucifixes need to be hidden.
— Even converts who no longer live in migrant housing attract the ire of Muslims, and she recounted her experience of being threatened at knifepoint on the street.
— She called the anti-Christian hate crimes “horrific attacks on our fundamental values and our Constitution. This kind of crime weighs on me more heavily than shoplifting. If we do nothing about it we will lose our foundations in this country. We are here in Germany, in a Christian country! We must not allow others to change that.”
— She said she felt that a “misconceived tolerance” had led Germany to be overly respectful to Islam, pointing to Ramadan arrangements as a “disastrous” example of this. During the Islamic month of fasting, migrant shelters in Germany catered to Muslim eating schedules, with Christians receiving only leftovers. The timing saw Christians disturbed by Muslims eating and reciting surahs before sunrise and then staying up very late for dinner.
Following are points made by the politician Erika Steinbach, who is a member of German parliament:
— She advocated deportation for Muslims who attack or insult Christian migrants on the basis of their religion.
— She is a vocal critic of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s policy to open Germany’s borders, calling for the European Union to set up refugee camps outside the bloc’s external borders where the migrants would “stay until the war is over, then go back home.”
— She called for the system of catering to the Muslims for Ramadan should be overhauled for next year, suggesting that migrant housing serves “breakfast, lunch and dinner as usual,” and that people who want to fast can save their meal to eat later on.
A German news report explains that the media has previously been denied access to an overcrowded refugee camp in Giessen, but politicians finally gave in to pressure and let the media inside to look around.
Once inside the camp, the media discovers that Muslim and Christian refugees are not separated from each other despite Christians being extremely persecuted by the Muslims.
The journalist speaks to a Christian refugee who says that he’s frightened because he thinks the camp is housing ISIS supporters and he can’t sleep at night because of it.
The refugee goes on to say that they loudly recite very specific verses of the Quran which bring back terrible memories to him every night— being the words ISIS says before they cut the heads off of people in Syria. He also says a friend of his was killed in that manner by ISIS.
He says, “For God’s sake I cannot stay here with IS and all. I am a Christian and I am afraid. There are so many problems here.”
The media was led through the camp with restrictions that they had to stay together and never leave the group, and preferably they were to speak with only a handful of chosen refugees despite many of them crowding the reporters anxious to speak to them.
