A “No Ban Act” was passed in the House of the U.S. Congress, which would repeal all of Trump’s travel bans and ensure that future presidents would be blocked from enacting similar bans, including even when the U.S. is at war.
The bill is an attempt to end Trump’s supposed “Muslim Ban,” where he has banned travel from several countries. Most people don’t realize that the countries which are banned are from a list that was devised by the Obama administration, and most Muslim countries don’t even have such restrictions anyway.
The hopelessly compromised U.S. Congresswoman Judy Chu has irrationally claimed that the bans were “driven by prejudice,” where she portrayed the important national security measure as being “hateful.” The bill would essentially make it impossible for the U.S. to do anything to defend itself whatsoever.
[Note that if there was no such travel ban, Jihadists from those regions would simply fly to the U.S., situate themselves in “sanctuary cities” or Muslim areas of the country in general and never leave.]
The act was passed on a mainly party-line vote of 233-183, however, two Republicans— Will Hurd of Texas and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania joined with Democrats.
[Despite his vote, Brian Fitzpatrick’s campaign website prominently features the following quote: “He is leading the charge to protect our families from the threat of international terrorism and extremism by championing a comprehensive strategy to defeat those who wish us harm.” His district is in the southeastern corner of Pennsylvania.
His vote is yet another example of how simply planning to “vote Republican” is not enough to fix problems. Voting Republican is only a “temporary fix” until there is a genuine awakening.
Remember that the political Establishment controls the Republicans also, and once enough people realize that “voting Republican” is by far the healthier choice, it will cause the Establishment to simply make more Republican candidates support leftist policies that are similar to the ones that the Democrats currently have (which is already happening with many RINOs, for example.)]
Thankfully, the Senate has no plans to take the measure up, and Trump would have certainly vetoed it if it would have come to that. The bill is another example of the dangerous anti-American agendas of Democrats. [Don’t ever vote for a Democrat!]
[Note however that Trump is still importing unvetted Islamists from Jihadist regions via the secretive “Refugee Resettlement Program.” Such “refugees” are selected by a corrupt UN program, and the President of the U.S. has the lone decision of how many to admit each year. Surprisingly, Trump has been bringing in tens of thousands every year even though he could have chosen to bring none. Also, wealthy Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia take in NO such refugees!]
A trailer for an upcoming Netflix docu-series “Immigration Nation” deceitfully creates an impression that immigration laws in the U.S. are inhumane.
I recently saw a Breitbart article that talks about a new Netflix “docu-series” called “Immigration Nation” that will debut on August 3. The trailer for the series portraits ICE agents as being cruel and callous, and it falsely creates an impression that immigration laws are inhumane.
The reality of ICE agents “smashing down doors” is not a very common occurrence, and it seldomly happens in sanctuary cities. Illegal immigrants are even allowed to drive without driver’s licenses and without liability insurance in cities like Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Even when migrants are arrested by ICE, their home countries often “slow-walk” their travel papers or refuse them altogether, resulting in them ultimately being released back into the U.S. See this information that details the truth of common misconceptions about illegal immigration in the United States.
I also don’t doubt that the political Establishment has issued the specific warrants for the arrests that are made on the show mostly for the propaganda purposes of it. Obviously the agents know that they are being filmed, so whatever they are doing is “for the cameras.”
I generally don’t support deportations unless migrants commit serious crimes, however I do think that new illegal immigration should be stopped and strict deportations should then be enforced for new illegal immigrants who arrive after a certain specified date.
(Also, anyone who subscribes to Netflix should be able to tell that it has increasingly been including a lot of corrupt and debauched content, which is not happening by accident. It is being used by the political Establishment as a tool for demoralizing society.)
(Note this video will switch to vertical format after pressing “play.”)
This relatively recent video shows the genuine reality of what the immigration situation was prior to the Coronavirus lockdown. An assistant to the border patrol in New Mexico explains the reality of immigration that was happening on the southern border of the United States as they are picking up a group of migrants who are crossing at night. He starts narrating at about 5:30 into the video.
Note that on July 23, 2020, Breitbart has reported that Trump is claiming that at least 88 thousand migrants have been kept out of the United States during the Coronavirus lockdown since March. Apparently this means that migrants have not been allowed to “surrender” to border patrol agents to gain entry into the U.S. as they have been previously doing.
See a News of Interest.TV summary article about immigration issues in the United States.
I often link to a section of the article “A Summary of the Secret Society the ‘Illuminati,’ Drawn from the Works of Henry Makow” called: “The ‘Jewish’ Conspiracy is Actually British Imperialism,” however I just noticed that it initially read as if it is somewhat “antisemitic” in the first few paragraphs, therefore I moved two paragraphs from later in the section to the top of it, and I think it reads much better now. I wish I would have done that a long time ago. Of course there is Jewish involvement in the global elite, but it is not a “Jewish” conspiracy. Many of the families are not Jewish.
All of the information in that article is very important, however I think a lot of it would seem contrary or outrageous to most people who don’t initially have enough background information before reading it.
Here is how I have rearranged the section:
The villains of the Illuminati conspiracy share the same occultic beliefs, but they come from all religious backgrounds. They are at the heart of our economic and cultural life, being the families who own the Bank of England, the U.S. Federal Reserve, and control the World Bank, IMF and the world’s intelligence agencies. The Bank of England was “nationalized” in 1946 but the power to create money remained in the same hands. The city of London is run by the Bank of England, which is a private corporation that is not subject to British Law. The bankers essentially dictate to British Parliament.
The “New World Order” is created from plans of the world’s central bankers to convert their unlimited economic power based on their monopoly over credit intro permanent global institutions of political and social control. Central banks like the Federal Reserve portrait themselves as government institutions but they are actually privately owned by about 300 families.
Some people think that an international “Jewish” conspiracy exists, however the reality is that the international central banking cartel is the only group with both the motive and the means to take over the world. Their “motive” is to protect their fraudulent private monopoly over government credit and money creation, and they need to establish a world government to ensure that no nation prints its own money or defaults on the loans which the bankers spun out of nothing. Their “means” is their unlimited wealth allowing them to essentially own governments, mass media, education, and organizations such as intelligence agencies and tax-exempt foundations.
Elements of the Venetian oligarchy, most of whom were Jewish, merged with England’s oligarchy from 1509-1715 through intermarriage and collaboration. “The English Revolution (1649) was the first in a series of revolutions designed to give them world hegemony. The establishment of the Bank of England by William [of Orange] in 1694 was the next crucial step. Behind the facade, England has been a ‘Jewish’ state for over 300 years.” (I, 35)
“The Jewish banking families made it a practice to marry their female offspring to spendthrift European aristocrats. In Jewish law, the mixed offspring of a Jewish mother is Jewish. For example, in 1878 Hannah Rothschild married Lord Rosebery who later become Prime Minister. (The male heirs marry Jews although Victor and his son Jacob Rothschild are exceptions. They both married gentiles.)” (I, 35)
Robert Hemphill, Credit Manager of the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta explains: “This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money, we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. … It is so important that our present civilization may collapse unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon.”
Rothschild banker John Sherman wrote an infamous letter to New York agents in 1863, proposing a National bank: “The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favors, that there will be no opposition from that class… The great body of the people, mentally incapable of comprehending, will bear its burden without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is [contrary] to their interests.”
[Also note that sometimes I see information on Henry Makow’s website that appears to be rather “anti-Jewish,” but I don’t think that he actually thinks that way, he is a Jewish convert to Christianity himself. I think perhaps he feels that he “needs” to communicate in such a manner now and then in order to be safe from being harmed for speaking about topics that the political Establishment doesn’t want to be known. (I do know for certain that he knows that the global elite are not a “Jewish” conspiracy, in any event.) I’ve written about such issues a few times in the past as well, such as at this link, and this link. I hope he is not angry with me for “outing” him in such a way. People should support him by buying his books, understanding that he is not actually an “antisemite.” See the links to purchase his books at the end of this commentary.]
I’ve been seeing a lot of reports of conflict happening when people respond to “Black Lives Matter” activism by saying “all lives matter,” or “Blue Lives Matter,” which often immediately triggers hostility from BLM activists. However, people should realize that such responses are generally not effective in situations like that.
Instead, it is essential that people communicate the truth about BLM being a corrupt Establishment-run organization that uses deceit to cause racial animosity in order to empower covert agendas of subverting and enslaving society with Communism. Most significantly, BLM blatantly lies about statistics of police brutality to make people think that police have a “homicidal bias” against black people, however the reality shows that there is actually no such bias at all.
It would often be fruitless to try to communicate such facts to BLM activists though since they likely will not listen or may even respond with hostility, but rather the information should be communicated to the general public instead.
I would recommend that people wear T-shirts that say “Police don’t have a ‘homicidal bias.’ Ask me why.” and hand out flyers explaining all of the issues with the BLM organization in a non-divisive manner. (Note that it might be a bad idea to wear such a T-shirt where there is a large concentration of people who are actually involved with the group though; but at least flyers can be handed out in such a situation.)
— How Donald Trump was accused of falsely claiming that Joe Biden wants to defund the police.— How “Community Policing” is a dangerous Marxist agenda.— How Joe Biden is deceitfully claiming that he “doesn’t want to defund the police,” and…— How enormous “defund the police” donations on the “Black Lives Matter” website have been going directly to Joe Biden’s presidential Campaign.
Donald Trump was accused of falsely claiming that Joe Biden wants to defund local police
Recently the mainstream media was widely reporting that Donald Trump was caught falsely claiming that Joe Biden intends to defund local police forces. Trump was being interviewed by a Fox reporter Chris Wallace, where Trump adamantly insisted that Biden said in a charter he signed with Bernie Sanders that he intends to defund the police. Trump and Wallace got into an argument about if Biden said to “defund the police,” so Trump then asked one of his staff to retrieve the charter. Wallace then later reported that the charter didn’t contain the words “defund the police,” which caused an avalanche of news reports stating that Trump was “caught in a lie” about Biden.
Following is a transcript of what was said:
Trump: “… [Democrat-run cities] have gotten out of control, and really it is because they want to defund the police, and Biden wants to defund the police—”
Wallace: “No sir, he does not!”
Trump: “Look, he signed a charter with Bernie Sanders—”
Wallace: “It saying NOTHING about defunding the police.” [Note: I think it is strange how Wallace abruptly jumped in to counter Trump with such certainly about the matter. Why was Wallace so ready to instantly retort in that way? How could he possibly have been such an “authority” about that specific charter that Trump was talking about? He is behaving as if he was actually the person who “wrote” the charter!]
Trump: “Oh really? It says ‘abolish,’ it says— Let’s go!” [Speaking to someone off-camera:] “Get me the charter please.”
Wallace: “All right..”
[Wallace later gloated the following on camera in the studio:]
Wallace: “So that led to a very interesting exchange where he had his staff go out and get the highlights from that 100 page compact that the Biden team and the Sanders team had signed, and he went through it, and he found a lot of things he objected to that Biden has agreed to, but he couldn’t find any indication— because there isn’t any— that Joe Biden has sought to defund and abolish the police. But let me say, he takes some shots at Joe Biden that I’ve never heard before…”
(Note that in the charter that is being talked about, it is true that Biden didn’t specifically say to “defund or abolish the police,” however much evidence does show that Biden intends to do exactly that, as the rest of this article explains.)
This “Trump War Room” Tweet shows Biden advocating for “defunding the police.” [Note I think it is strange that Trump supplied only this video clip as a vindication of his claim though, since it does not explain the actual frightening situation of what Biden is intending to implement (which I explain in the rest of this article.)]
Joe Biden says police have "BECOME THE ENEMY" and calls for CUTTING police funding: "Yes, absolutely!" pic.twitter.com/PKXvz3zobe
“Community Policing” is a dangerous Marxist agenda
See an article on Open Minded Realism that explains the following:
In the year 2000, Phillip Worts, a detective for the San Diego Police Department, wrote an essay that details an ongoing agenda of the political Establishment to implement “Community Oriented Policing,” which is actually a plan to turn police officers into Soviet-style Marxist “change agents.”
In the article, Worts first explains a basic history of Marxism and the agenda of implementing it in the U.S., and he then details the writings of the “father of community policing” Robert Trojanowicz which shows that he strategized to first intentionally cause “crime, disorder, and fear of crime” in communities in order to create an excuse to implement “Community policing.” Worts then explains how such “Community police” are actually playing the role of Marxist facilitators that remove an important previously existing barrier between the increasingly tyrannical government and public citizens.
Joe Biden is claiming that he “broke” with “Black Lives Matter” because he “doesn’t want to defund the police,” however his stances about the defunding the police haven’t actually changed!
Many mainstream news stories are reporting that Joe Biden has “broken off his associations with ‘Black Lives Matter’” because he “does not support the nationwide “defund the police” movement,” however Biden is actually being extremely dishonest about the matter.
In truth, Biden does support defunding the police in the same manner as “Black Lives Matter” has been advocating— where funds that previously went to police departments are redirected to Marxist “Community Policing”-type programs.
Biden’s spokesman Andrew Bates recently released a statement that said the following:
“Biden does not believe that police should be defunded. He hears and shares the deep grief and frustration of those calling out for change, and is driven to ensure that justice is done and that we put a stop to this terrible pain.”
The statement then talked about “the urgent need for reform .. so that officers can focus on the job of policing.”
It then said, “This also means funding COMMUNITY POLICING PROGRAMS that improve relationships between officers and residents, and provides the training that is needed to avert tragic, unjustifiable deaths. (emphasis added)”
The statement also said that funding should be made available so police departments can diversify to “resemble the communities in which they serve.”
.. In other words, Biden wants to implement what Black Lives Matter actually means when they say “defund the police.”
Biden is being deceptive by attempting to portray the replacement programs as supposedly “counting as being part of the police”— therefore according to his definition “the police are not actually being defunded,” but rather the funds are merely being “redirected” in a “more effective manner”! But nothing about Joe Biden’s stance has changed from what it was other than the fact that he is “claiming” that he “doesn’t support Black Lives Matter” and that he “doesn’t want to defund police.” It’s a big lie!
“Defund the police” donations on the “Black Lives Matter” website go directly to Joe Biden’s presidential Campaign
A June 11 article on “The National Pulse” website explains that the “Black Lives Matter” organization is partnered with “ActBlue,” which is a fundraising platform that is the top donor to Joe Biden’s campaign.
The article explains that if anyone donates to a petition that is on the homepage of the BLM website to “defund the police,” they are re-routed to ActBlue with the message “We appreciate your support of the movement and our ongoing fight to end state-sanctioned violence, liberate Black people, and end white supremacy forever.”
Joe Biden is the top beneficiary of ActBlue’s fundraising efforts, with it donating over $119 million dollars to Biden’s campaign, which vastly surpasses all over sources of revenue for his campaign by over $100 million.
As I’ve mentioned previously, I plan to have my organizations present both “pro-life” and “pro-choice” viewpoints by creating articles for each of the opposing arguments. I think that issue is not (necessarily) one that involves a lot of “deception” but rather much of it is a “difference of opinion,” therefore I think having two articles that present opposing viewpoints is a good idea. I think such an “opposing viewpoint” format could be able to work with other topics as well if there is enough interest in doing that, but in any event all of the articles are already usually the result of examining as many sides of the issues as possible.
Personally I’m opposed to abortion and I think it should be avoided at all costs, but I think politicians attempting to make it entirely illegal will not work due to public opposition to that, and in fact them trying to do that will have very harmful repercussions where dangerous leftist agendas will be empowered as a side-effect, as I explain more in detail later in this article.
In a recent article I criticized Kanye West for statements that he made at a speech, but I do agree with some of the things that he said. For example I think it is good that he spoke out against abortion.
I recently received a “Planned Parenthood” mailer where it said a local congressman is “putting our health at risk” because he voted for “the most restrictive abortion ban in the country” which would have banned abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Note though that the “most restrictive ban” would have been after 20 weeks into the pregnancy— Not 20 days for example, but 20 weeks! Do many people really think that is unreasonable?
I think late term abortions are abhorrent, and I think they should be illegal unless the woman’s life is (truly) in danger; however I’m also opposed to political candidates running on “100% pro-life platforms” when there is not nearly enough public support for them to do so— which ultimately only leads to empowering the harmful agendas of their leftist opposition.
(Note that in the above linked article I talk about a large group of politicians in Alabama who passed the 100% pro-life “Human Life Protection Act” which outlaws all types of abortions in all circumstances. The article previously had a picture of many of the politicians with a Masonic “stamp” on it, but I don’t actually know if all of those politicians are Freemasons, so I changed the image and I published a retraction about that. I’m looking forward to the resolution so that people will be able to look over articles and make suggestions before they are posted. But I should have been more careful with that in any event, I usually am in such cases. It will be interesting to hear people’s opinions about the existing articles on the websites in general. I think all of the information as a whole is very accurate and relevant, and it communicates very important information.)
As I was saying, people should be aware that sometimes politicians and activists who “claim” to support a certain position sometimes are actually trying to covertly empower the opposition to it. For example gun disarmament activists sometimes brandish weapons in public to try to frighten people into outlawing guns (that is almost certainly happening here, here, and here) which is one of the reasons that I usually don’t support “open carry” laws even though I am a staunch gun rights advocate.
Many people are dupes or servants of the corrupt political Establishment, where they have either been falsely led to believe that they are ultimately “empowering good” with their subversive activities; or they are knowingly corrupt and they have been falsely led to believe that they will be exempt from the evil subjugation that they are helping to bring to fruition. Did “good” come about though the people living in Nicaragua being enslaved and killed by Communism, for example?— Of course not! (And note that the same sort of situation will soon likely be happening in the U.S. as well. I highly recommend reading the actual summarized chapters of that article, it is very shocking and disturbing information.)
An article in the Columbus Dispatch explains that a Mosque in Columbus, Ohio will soon be starting to broadcast a very loud Muslim call to prayer over loudspeakers five times a day, and it will continue to do so on a daily basis from that point on.
The article says the mosque is “trying to pull the community together” by doing so and “making history at the same time,” and it quotes Mohamed Abdi, who handles community relations for the mosque who says, “This will help [Muslims in the area] feel more connected to their community and the mosque.”
This video by the activist “Apostate Prophet” explains that mosques around the world declare over loudspeakers at least five times a day that “Allah is the greatest,” and he explains how the calls to prayer are very intrusive to the communities.
Following are various videos of Mosques in the West that loudly broadcast the call to prayer five times a day:
A black New York radio host who calls himself “Charlamagne tha God” said that ViacomCBS recently firing a black media personality Nick Cannon for antisemitic and anti-white statements that he aired two weeks ago proved that “Jewish people .. have the power.”
Nick Cannon created and hosted a Viacom-owned VH1 sketch comedy series “Wild ‘N Out,” that has been airing for fifteen years since 2005, and he was a chairman of the pay TV channel “Teen Nic.” Cannon is also hosting a show on the Fox network called “The Masked Singer.”
Cannon was recently fired by ViacomCBS for antisemitic and anti-white statements that he made in a podcast that he recorded last year and aired a few weeks ago. The New York radio host “Charlamagne” then made a broadcast where he defended Cannon and his views, and he claimed “Jewish people” were responsible for his firing since “they have the power.”
The following video clip contains audio segments of what Cannon initially said, as well as the commentary by “Charlamagne” on his show. (I have transcribed most of the video and I have also included my own rebuttals to it:)
[FIRST OF ALL— Note that most significantly “ViacomCBS” would never give a show to anyone on their network if they were not covertly controlled by the political Establishment in the first place, therefore it is more or less a certainty that Nick Cannon (and also most likely “Charlamagne”) are in the Masonic Boule secret society. In other words they are almost certainly doing exactly what the political Establishment has been telling them to do. (Also note that “Charlamagne” might be in the “Muslim Brotherhood” instead, which is also a Masonic organization.)]
Here is a transcript of the statements in the video and my rebuttals to them:]
CANNON’S CLAIM— “When we go as deep as the Rothschilds, centralized banking, the blood lines that control everything— even outside of America…”
MY REBUTTAL
It is true that central banks are one of the most significant sources of corruption in the world. They create the world’s money out of nothing at the instructions of the Masonic global elite who then use it to control the nations of the world, in part through them essentially being “loan sharks” to make countries indebted to them.
The world’s central banks are privately owned and controlled by about 300 families who are the world’s most genuine “global elite,” and many of the families are not Jewish. For example the Rockefellers and the Carnegies are not Jewish. The Rothschild family has been running powerful and influential central banks in Europe since the 1700’s.
Whenever a celebrity mentions the “Rothschilds,” it is immediately met with an avalanche of criticism in the media claiming that even simply mentioning the Rothschild name is an “antisemitic trope” that was “propagated by Hitler.” However, much evidence shows that Nazi Germany was actually funded and controlled by the Masonic banking elite. (See all parts of the linked article under the section “WORLD WAR II, NAZISM, ZIONISM” for more information about that. Also note that the Holocaust definitely DID happen, as the article also explains)
The truth of the matter is that the global elite are not a “Jewish” conspiracy, but rather it is a “Masonic” one, and the global elite know that as long as people think it is “the Jews” who are responsible for the world’s problems then they are safe from being exposed.
CANNON’S CLAIM— “… When we talk about if ‘we’ [black people] were truly the children of Israel, and we’re defining who the Jewish people are because I feel like if we actually can understand that construct, then we can see that there is no hate involved. When we talk about the lies, the deceit, how the fake dollar controls all of this, then maybe we can get to the reason why they wanted to silence you, why they wanted to silence Louis Farrakhan,” and they want to throw that ‘we are having hate speech’ when it’s never hate speech. You can’t be antisemitic when we are the Semitic people. When we are the same people that they want to be, that’s our birthright.”
MY REBUTTAL
Cannon is essentially trying to claim that “the REAL Israelites were black,” which is an idea that has been debunked. He then resorts to a ridiculous claim of “it is not possible for Semites to be antisemites,” as if such a cheap play on words legitimizes his irrational hatred.
Cannon is also essentially trying to say something along the lines of: “As long as WE (black people) are recognized as the ‘true’ Jews, then there is no hated, but otherwise we do hate Jews.”
It is interesting that Cannon is focusing on “the Jews” as being the source of the world’s problems, which is exactly what the global elite wants to happen (as explained in the previous section.) It is also interesting that Cannon is almost certainly a member of the Boule secret society which is a Masonic organization. Therefore, his statements are almost certainly what the global elite “wants” him to say in order to ensure that many black people continue to think that “the Jews” are the cause of their problems.
CANNON’S CLAIM— “… And the people that don’t have it [melanin in their skin (meaning ‘white people’)] are a little ‘less’— In where the term actually comes from because I’m bringing it all the way around to Minister Farrakhan, to where they may not have the compassion when they were sent to the mountains of the Caucuses, when they didn’t have the power of the sun, that the sun then started to deteriorate them, so then they are acting out of fear, they are acting out of low self-esteem, so therefore the only way that they can act is evil. So then these people who didn’t have what we have (and when I say ‘we’ I speak of the ‘the melanated people’), they had to be savages.”
MY REBUTTAL
Cannon is generalizing that ALL white people are “savages” and “only evil,” due to the fact that whites are “afraid,” have “low self-esteem,” and because they are jealous.
“CHARLAMAGNE” THEN CHIMES IN, COMMENTING ABOUT WHAT CANNON SAID AT THIS POINT— “See that’s a whole different conversation though. Because you [(talking to the co-host Angela Yee)] sit here and act like white people don’t have a history of mass racial violence in this country is just inaccurate. There is long list of mass racial violence— “savagery,” “murder,” whatever you want to call it from white people on damn near everybody in this country. Racial violence has been a distinct part of this country since 1660, and that’s a fact, and you don’t have to run down the long list of violent murderous, savage acts from white people in this country. I just encourage you all to just visit blackpast.org, and look at all the racial violence that blacks have experienced at the hands of white people. So that’s a whole different conversation.”
MY REBUTTAL
Of course it is true that black people have suffered in the United States, although Cannon and “Charlemagne” are trying to reinforce an irrational concept that “all” white people were responsible.
Also, pretty much all races of people have engaged in atrocities— it isn’t some sort of a “white only” phenomenon as Cannon and “Charlamagne” are attempting to claim. For example many Africans captured other Africans in wars in Africa and then sold them as slaves. And many Native American tribes fought vicious wars against each other before white people even arrived.
White people have suffered also— think about the hundreds of millions of people who fought and died in the U.S. Civil War and World Wars I and II. Were black people fighting and dying in those wars?— No, they were mostly not. Also the people in Russia and Eastern Europe are white, yet hundreds of millions of them were slaughtered or enslaved by Communism (which is a tool of the same political Establishment that is almost certainly telling Cannon and “Charlamagne” what to say!) Were as many Africans killed in the U.S. as that?— Not as many! (Despite that also obviously being a tragedy though, of course.)
Also I should point out that the “blackpast.org” website that “Charlamagne” espouses has a pro-Islam stance and it entirely downplays Islam’s role in the enslavement of Africans for over 1,400 years! For example, this article talks about the subject of an “African diaspora,” and you have to read it carefully to even pick up on the fact that the “diaspora” came about through enslavement. Compare that article’s treatment of the subject to the following video that explains the ACTUAL shocking truth about Islam and slavery!
.. By this point it should be clear that not a word that is coming out of Cannon’s or “Charlamagne’s” mouths has any legitimacy at all.
THE CO-HOST ANGELA YEE THEN READS A STATEMENT THAT WAS RELEASED BY VIACOM/CBS— “ViacomCBS condemns bigotry of any kind and we categorically denounce all forms of anti-Semitism. We have spoken with Nick Cannon about an episode of his podcast ‘Cannon’s Class’ on YouTube, which promoted hateful speech and spread anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. While we support ongoing education and dialogue in the fight against bigotry, we are deeply troubled that Nick has failed to acknowledge or apologize for perpetuating anti-Semitism, and we are terminating our relationship with him. We are committed to doing better in our response to incidents of anti-Semitism, racism, and bigotry. ViacomCBS will have further announcements on our efforts to combat hate of all kinds.”
THEN “CHARLAMAGNE” CHIMES IN AGAIN— “Listen, Nick is ‘my guy.’ It’s a shame it had to be him, but that’s what you can do when you have the ‘power,’ and if it’s one thing Jewish people have showed us, is they have the power. I can’t wait until the day that black people are able to fire people for saying things about us that we deem racist. We can barely get cops fired for actually killing us …”
MY REBUTTAL
Obviously it is antisemitic and irrational for “Charlamagne” to blame “Jewish people” for Cannon’s firing, and his statement claiming that people aren’t fired for saying things that black people deem as racist is also ridiculous. (Some high profile cases of whites not being fired for racist behavior do exist, but those situations are often “engineered” by the political Establishment for the purpose of creating divisiveness. More often than not the opposite is true where whites are unfairly persecuted.)
“CHARLAMAGNE” CONTINUES— “… They fired Nick for referencing a theory written by a physiologist on racism. …”
MY REBUTTAL
“Charlamagne” is trying to rationalize that Cannon’s statements are “legitimate” because they somehow “reference a theory written by a physiologist on racism,” which is as ridiculous as everything else that he says.
“CHARLAMAGNE” CONTINUES— “Also though, if you are going to have that conversation, have it with a Jewish scholar, have it with a Rabbi, have it was someone with that community so anything you say that’s not accurate they can correct you. So when you say something that they deem antisemitic they can correct you. To me that is how you can avoid things like his happening.”
MY REBUTTAL
“Charlamagne” is now attempting to falsely portrait himself as some sort of a “fair and open minded” person by suggesting that people should “seek out Rabbis” to first make sure that their (antisemitic) beliefs are accurate.
“CHARLAMAGNE” CONTINUES— “It’s two different conversations that went on in that conversation. You know the conversation about what is deemed antisemitic— I don’t know anything about that. You want to talk about the history of white people in America and the racial violence and the savagery and the murder, that’s a whole different conversation. I’m not casting a wide net saying that all white people are savages— but if you want to have an accurate conversation about history— yes, white people do have a history of mass racial violence in this country. That is accurate.”
MY REBUTTAL
Again “Charlamagne” attempts to propagate his irrational anti-white views, but this time he is also attempting to make himself appear as if he has arrived at his conclusions in some sort of an “open minded” manner. (I have debunked his anti-white views in the previous rebuttal that contains the video about Islamic slavery.)
THE CO-HOST ANGELA YEE THEN READS A FACEBOOK POST THAT NICK CANNON MADE AFTER HE WAS TERMINATED BY VIACOM/CBS—
Anyone who knows me knows that I have no hate in my heart nor malice intentions. I do not condone hate speech nor the spread of hateful rhetoric. We are living in a time when it is more important than ever to promote unity and understanding.
The Black and Jewish communities have both faced enormous hatred, oppression persecution and prejudice for thousands of years and in many ways have and will continue to work together to overcome these obstacles.
When you look at The Media, and other sectors in our nation’s history, African Americans and The people of the Jewish community have partnered to create some of the best, most revolutionary work we know today.
I am an advocate for people’s voices to be heard openly, fairly and candidly. In today’s conversation about anti-racism and social justice, I think we all – including myself – must continue educating one another and embrace uncomfortable conversations – it’s the only way we ALL get better. I encourage more healthy dialogue and welcome any experts, clergy, or spokespersons to any of my platforms to hold me accountable and correct me in any statement that I’ve made that has been projected as negative. Until then, I hold myself accountable for this moment and take full responsibility because My intentions are only to show that as a beautiful human species we have way more commonalities than differences, So let’s embrace those as well as each other. We All Family!
MY REBUTTAL
Everything that Cannon said in his “apology letter” is contrary to what he said (with much conviction) in his broadcast.
“CHARLAMAGNE” THEN CLAIMS— “I mean he’s right— You can’t tell Jewish people what is Antisemitic, just like nobody can tell black people what is racist, just like you can’t tell gay people what’s homophobic, you can’t tell women what’s sexist. The only thing you can do is when you say something like those things, you’ve got to sit back and listen. I can’t tell you that what you felt isn’t what you feel. I can’t do that.”
MY REBUTTAL
“Charlemagne” is attempting to trick people into reinforcing their often inaccurate perceptions by making sure that they equate what they “feel” with what the reality actually is. Essentially he is encouraging people to say: “Don’t try telling ME what is racist!”
ANGELA YEE THEN MENTIONED THAT CANNON WROTE MANY “TWEETS” AND SHE PROCEEDED TO END THE REPORT. (I have detailed the Tweets as follows:)
FIRST, Cannon “re-Tweeted” articles in the media that came out about him after he was fired, such as this July 15 Tweet that links to an “Essence.com” article.
THEN Cannon released a large number of “Tweets” that were essentially “groveling” to Jewish people— however none of the Tweets apologized to “white people” despite the fact that his attack on whites was even more extreme. Each of the Tweets was responded to by people who often either accused him of “caving to the pressure of Jews” or by people who pointed out that he hasn’t been apologizing for his anti-white statements. (Perhaps he intended his groveling to be interpreted as “being sarcastic”— it certainly seems to me as if he intended it to be that way:)
“First and foremost I extend my deepest and most sincere apologies to my Jewish sisters and brothers for the hurtful and divisive words that came out of my mouth during my interview with Richard Griffin.” — LINK
“They reinforced the worst stereotypes of a proud and magnificent people and I feel ashamed of the uninformed and naïve place that these words came from. The video of this interview has since been removed.” — LINK
“While the Jewish experience encompasses more than 5,000 years and there is so much I have yet to learn, I have had at least a minor history lesson over the past few days and to say that it is eye-opening would be a vast understatement.” — LINK
“I want to express my gratitude to the Rabbis, community leaders and institutions who reached out to me to help enlighten me, instead of chastising me.” — LINK
“I want to assure my Jewish friends, new and old, that this is only the beginning of my education—I am committed to deeper connections, more profound learning and strengthening the bond between our two cultures today and every day going forward.” — LINK
“I just had the blessed opportunity to converse with Rabbi Abraham Cooper director of global social action @SimonWiesenthal My first words to my brother was, I apologize for the hurt I caused the Jewish Community….” — LINK
“On my podcast I used words & referenced literature I assumed to be factual to uplift my community instead turned out to be hateful propaganda and stereotypical rhetoric that pained another community For this I am deeply sorry but now together we can write a new chapter of healing” — LINK
“Morning radio family. I have decided to take some time away from my radio show so I can commit myself to deeper, more thorough reflection and education.” — LINK
“I will use this time to establish an action plan towards real, impactful change and advocacy aimed at bringing people together.” — LINK
“I continue to express my gratitude to the Rabbis, community leaders and institutions who have reached out to me to help enlighten me.” — LINK
“Their input and friendship will help me as I further commit myself to more profound learning and towards strengthening the bond between the Black and Jewish cultures every day going forward.” — LINK
THEN.. (“Surprise!”) Following Cannon’s phony-seeming groveling apologies that never even apologized to white people, the Fox network announced that Cannon would remain with the “Masked Singer” show, saying: “He is clear and remorseful that his words were wrong and lacked both understanding and context, and inadvertently promoted hate. This was important for us to observe.”
On Tuesday, President Trump was asked in an interview with CBS News about why so many African Americans have been killed by the police, and Trump replied, “So are white people! What a terrible question to ask,” and he added “more white people, by the way, are killed by police.”
But first of all, why was it a “terrible question”?! Obviously it is an important question, especially due to the events that have been happening during the past few months.
Also, Trump saying that more white people are killed by police is in fact accurate, but he didn’t address the fact that a much higher percentage of black people are killed by the police, and in doing so he made it appear as if he was trying to distort the facts for racist purposes.
The truth of the matter is that all studies show that the police kill all demographics of people in generally equal proportions once crime rates are figured in. A higher percentage of black people are killed by the police, but they also commit much higher rates of violent crime which puts them in close proximity with police at a much higher rates as well. See this article which explains those statistics.
Trump’s behavior in the interview fits a classic type of “Trump communication” where what he says is actually technically true, but he intentionally doesn’t explain it properly in order for it to have the maximum divisive effect. Corrupt leftist media outlets then capitalize on it by harping on what he said to make it seem as bigoted and wrong as possible (as this NPR article does, as was intended to happen by Trump), and conservative outlets almost universally ignore the fact that Trump has said anything at all and simply talk about something else.
[Note: July 17, 2020— For an example of typical corruption of leftist media outlets and NPR in particular, see this article on NPR entitled “What’s In A Karen” that was running on the same day as the other linked article. The article intentionally misrepresents the situation of the “Central Park Karen” that happened the previous month. For the truth about that matter, see this article on Open Minded Realism.]
Trump’s intentionally divisive communication is pure rocket fuel for his leftist opposition such as violent Marxist anti-freedom groups like BLM and Antifa, and it gives Joe Biden’s corrupt campaign a hefty boost. The NPR article also mentions studies that say that two-thirds of Americans said that they disprove of the way Trump handles race relations, and it says that Biden is an average of nine percentage points ahead of Trump. (Note also that many busy people get their news only from NPR when they listen to the radio in their cars, and in doing so they are being very misinformed about the real problems that are happening in the country.)
As corrupt and divisive as Trump’s communication is, he at least purports to be opposed to Establishment corruption. Hillary would have been an absolutely evil president who would have wholeheartedly embraced the corrupt Establishment and the destruction of the United States, and of course Joe Biden would do the same.
Trump recently said in a press conference at the White House: “[There has] probably never been a time when candidates are so different. We want law and order; they don’t want law and order. We want strong closed borders with people able to come in through merit, through a legal process; they don’t want to have any borders at all.”
A Breitbart article details a list of over 40 disastrous things that Joe Biden would do if he was elected president, as drawn up by Trump’s staff based on Biden’s proposals and drawn from a transcript of Trump’s press conference.
Here is the horrific list from the article:
1. Abolish immigration detention. No more detention. You come in here illegally, no more detention. 2. Stop all deportation. 3. End prosecution of illegal border crossers. 4. Support the deadly sanctuary cities. 5. Incentivize illegal-alien child smuggling. 6. Expand asylum for all new illegal aliens. 7. Cancel all asylum cooperation agreements with Honduras, Guatemala, with El Salvador. 8. Taxpayer-funded lawyers will be given to all illegal aliens. 9. Abolish immigration enforcement against illegal workers. 10. Restore Catch and Release policies for illegals. 11. Grant work permits for illegal aliens. 12. Provide taxpayer subsidies and welfare for illegal aliens and new immigrants. 13. Federal Student Aid and free community college for illegal aliens. 14. Sign new immigrants up for welfare immediately. 15. End requirement for immigrants’ self-sufficiency and maximize their welfare. 16. End all travel bans, including from jihadist regions. 17. Grant mass amnesty. 18. Vastly expand low-skilled immigration to the United States. 19. Increase refugee admissions by 700 percent. 20. Abolish law enforcement as we know it. 21. End cash bail. 22. Abolish completely the death penalty. 23. Appoint social justice prosecutors in order to free violent criminals. 24. End mandatory minimums. 25. Incentivize prison closure. 26. End solitary confinement. 27. Free federal housing for former inmates. 28. Rejoin Paris Climate Accord. 29. Mandate net-zero carbon emissions for homes, offices, and all new buildings by 2030. 30. Mandate zero carbon emissions from power plants by 2035. 31. Mandate net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. 32. Mandate all 500,000 school buses and all 3 million government vehicles be changed to zero-emission vehicles within five years. 33. Install 500,000 taxpayer-funded charging stations nationwide. 34. End school choice. 35. End tax credit scholarships serving disadvantaged students in 26 states. 36. Oppose 14 million Americans with education savings accounts and get rid of school choice, having to do with school choice. 37. Eliminate school choice in Washington, D.C. 38. Abolish all charter schools. 39. Ban funding for charter schools in poor neighborhoods. 40. Abolish educational standards. 41. Abolish the suburbs with AFFH regulations. 42. They’re going to rip down the wall.
[Note that Trump’s actual policies are generally much better, but they are not nearly as good as most people assume, despite his rhetoric. For example he has been continuing to import many tens of thousands of unvetted Muslims from jihadist regions despite his supposed “travel ban” and despite the fact that wealthy Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia take NO supposed refugees! Such “refugees” are chosen by a corrupt UN program and the president of the U.S. has the sole decision of how many to admit, yet Trump has still decided to bring in many tens of thousands! (And note a “corrupt Obama-appointed judge” didn’t “force Trump to do it”— he has been secretively making that decision for himself every year! Joe Biden actually ESTABLISHED that program along with Ted Kennedy in 1980 during the Cater administration!)]
