Image from Wikipedia.
I recently saw this New American article that advocates that abortion should be outlawed even in the case of rape and incest. I usually agree with New American articles, but I don’t really with this one. Personally I support pro-choice rights up to a certain point in the pregnancy such as when a heartbeat can start to be detected, although of course I think people should choose not to have an abortion altogether. I definitely agree with bans on later-term abortions, but I would support an exception to save the mother’s life as long as it couldn’t be exploited as a loophole. I disagree with pro-life laws that outlaw abortion even in cases of rape or incest though.
Many pro-choice feminist-types base their voting entirely on that issue, and the political Establishment is aware of that and they exploit it to “scare” them into also voting for harmful leftist agendas that are intended to destroy the United States, such as open borders; which I think can be a reason why the rape and incest exemptions are increasingly not being allowed.
[Note: If pro-life supporters would like to be involved with my organizations they will be very welcome. I don’t want to focus on the abortion issue much because I think there is already a lot of activism on both sides. I do think it could be good to create a “summary of reasons to be pro-life” article along with a “summary of reasons to be pro-choice” article. My priority is mostly communicating about issues that people are entirely uninformed or misinformed about, whereas I think the abortion issue is mostly one of a “difference of opinion,” and it is very divisive issue as well.]