Month: June 2022

[Note: July 13— I have directly linked to a video about Islamization at a New York school.  July 2, 2022— I have added the section “The concept of ‘abortion courts’ comprised of panels of doctors would be an effective solution with the abortion issue”, and updated the section talking about issues with the separation of church and state.]

States such as Louisiana, Idaho, and Georgia are attempting to implement extreme legislation including outlawing contraceptives, sentencing women who get abortions with life in prison, and sentencing women who attempt to leave their state for abortions with prison time.

The topic of abortion is a divisive one, and recent events of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe vs. Wade has been causing a lot of unrest in the country.

While many conservatives agree with not allowing any type of abortions in their states, they should be aware that the political elite has an agenda of exploiting such abortion bans for nefarious purposes, as this article explains along with other related issues.

Most people don’t understand that almost all politicians are secretly controlled by one small group of global elite individuals, and they also don’t understand the harmful agendas that those elite are implementing.

Two strategies are being implemented by the global elite to nefariously exploit the abortion issue.  Their first strategy it to maximize the stratification of the U.S. states in order to “divide and conquer” the population of the country, and their second strategy is to run conservative candidates who are intended to appear as extreme as possible in order to empower harmful leftist agendas.

Both of the strategies are being implemented with the intention of hastening the destruction of the U.S. in order to usher in elite’s planned coming New World Order, which will be a totalitarian communist “post-industrial feudal system.”

This article details the realities of those harmful strategies, and it makes suggestions about how to circumvent those situations.

___

 

What does the political Establishment have planned for the U.S. and the rest of the world?

Most voters do not understand the reality of the “false left-right paradigm” where almost all politicians are controlled by the same small group of global elite individuals.

Most voters also aren’t aware of the elite’s agenda of implementing a “New World Order,” where almost all of humanity is planned to be subverted in a totalitarian communist “post-industrial feudal system”— under which almost all of the people on the Earth are planned to be depopulated, impoverished, dumbed down, and made to be as dependent on the global elite as possible in a permanent underclass.

See the articles and videos at this link for more information about these issues.

___

 

Essentially all politicians are controlled by the same global elite

Despite the fact that many conservative politicians claim to be opposed to abortion, the reality is that many of them don’t actually care very much about that matter, but rather they are simply doing what they are told to do by the global elite.

The “false left-right paradigm” is all-encompassing in politics.  Essentially all world leaders and most lower ranking politicians serve the same group of global elite individuals, where such politicians are kept in line though blackmail by being required to compromise themselves by engaging in illegal and highly taboo activity including even pedophilia and murder.

Almost all of the politicians in the United States are secretively or secretly Freemasons who are required to do as they are told.  Therefore most of even the most genuine-seeming conservative Republicans are essentially just playing a role; it is not only the more obvious RINOs (“Republicans In Name Only”) who are doing that.

See this article that details many aspects of these issues, and also see this video where the activist Altiyan Childs explains issues with Freemasonry.

___

 

Total abortion bans in conservative states are causing harmful stratification of the U.S., as has been strategized by the global elite

I think most conservative voters who support total abortion bans are well-meaning, but the conservative politicians who are bringing those bans more often than not have nefarious motivations.

The implementation of 100% abortion bans in conservative states will undoubtedly lead to extreme stratification in the U.S., where many liberals will end up relocating to and accumulating in leftist states such as on the west coast, where sadly abortions will continue to be allowed up until the moment of birth.  (And some of such states are even attempting to institute abortions after birth!  See this article, this article, and this article.)

Many conservative voters will assume that not allowing even the use of morning-after pills in their states will help in their cause of prompting liberals whose values they disagree with to leave for other states, and their “conservative” politicians will be more than willing to accommodate doing that, however most of such politicians will actually be doing it for nefarious ulterior motives that the conservative voters do not realize, as the following points explain:

 1.  The liberals who will be prompted to move to other states will of course still be living in the United States, and many will also be having extreme later-term surgical abortions.

 2.  The stratification of the country that will be occurring due to liberals and conservatives concentrating in their own states will significantly hasten the impending demise of the U.S., due to regions of the country increasingly becoming divided along ideological lines.  In particular, the political Establishment that covertly controls all sides (such as by controlling essentially all politicians and the media) will continue to do whatever is possible to stoke hatred and division within the country, which will almost certainly also include staging false flag attacks meant to be blamed on the opposing sides.

 3.  Therefore, conservative voters who will initially attempt to “liberate their states from liberals” by prompting them to move elsewhere in such a manner are actually being tricked into doing that for the purpose of hastening the destruction of their own states as well as the entire United States— After which the U.S. won’t even exist anymore, and with almost everyone being enslaved by the global elite who have a long history of covertly subjugating large regions of the Earth with totalitarian communism, such as they had done in Russia and China.

(Also see the this video detailing many aspects of the phenomena of the stratification related to the abortion issue.)

___

 

The global elite are also implementing agendas that are intended to be interpreted as being too extreme by most voters, being calculated to empower leftist agendas

 1.  The political Establishment can turn Republican states into Democrat ones when it wishes to do so, by simply having the candidates on all sides strategically either attract or repel potential voters in order to acquire whatever results they are trying to achieve.

 2.  Essentially all liberal voters, and also many of the conservative voters living in conservative states will be put off by total abortion bans, along with such voters also being put off by whatever other factors that the global elite will engineer in order to sufficiently empower leftist candidates.

 3.  The political Establishment will then run what will appear to be “reasonable” liberal candidates as an alternative, however those candidates will also quietly be bringing the most harmful of leftist agendas that are already in advanced stages in the Democrat states— thus advancing the global elite’s agenda of destroying the United States, exactly as in the previous scenario.

[Note:  I had envisioned this scenario a few years ago and I wrote this article about it.]

___

 

The case for the continued legal availability of “medication abortion” (meaning “morning-after pills”)

[Note:  Admittedly my approach detailed in this section is not a “purist” one, but in my opinion it is most effective for the actual reduction of the amount of suffering that is caused by the abortion issue.

I respect the intentions of pro-life purists as long as they don’t actually have ulterior motives for espousing that view.  Pro-life purists are very welcome to be involved with my organizations.  Obviously they can personally disagree with the views I am advancing here, and I will also present their opinions even though my opinion is different.

On the other hand, I definitely don’t agree with views that are too much in the other direction, such as supporting partial birth abortions.  My organizations will speak out against those agendas.

I previously mentioned being interested in the idea of creating an article that summarizes reasons to be pro-life, along with an article that summarizes reasons to be pro-choice.  I’m still interested in doing that, and I would also be giving my own opinions in those articles which will be opposed to later term abortions.]

While I think any abortion is a tragedy at any stage of a pregnancy and women should always choose not to do it, I do think that the use of a “morning-after pill” is very preferable to later term surgical abortions, and it should be legal to do so.  While the unborn child is a life even when it is only a cluster of a few cells, the cluster of cells cannot feel pain at that stage so I think the trade-off of allowing abortions at that point is worth it.  I do agree that some women routinely using morning-after pills simply as “birth control” is an abomination, but I think the use of such pills should still be legal nonetheless.

I recently saw a segment in this horrifying video that illustrates how later term abortions are performed, where it explains how they use forceps to tear the living child apart limb-by-limb.  I can’t imagine how someone could support that being legal unless it genuinely is a case of the mother’s life being in danger.

I agree with not allowing later-term surgical abortions, such as after when a heartbeat can be detected for example.  I saw a video where a woman was debating that issue and she was arguing that sometimes women don’t realize that they are pregnant until after a few months, but I don’t have sympathy for that over the child’s life in such a case.  If a woman is sexually active then she should be monitoring if she is pregnant or not.

Many feminist-types have been conditioned during their entire lives to be absolutists about being pro-choice at all stages of the pregnancy, even up until birth, and that situation is being exploited by the global elite in order to trick such people into also supporting other harmful leftist agendas.

Of course it is great for women to be strict about not having any abortions whatsoever when they are making that decision for themselves, but I think it is a bad idea to not legally allow the use of morning-after pills that significantly reduce the amount of traumatic surgical abortions that would otherwise occur.

 

I saw this meme for the first time today.  I’m surprised that I’ve never seen activists use this phrase before, I think it is a very effective one.  (I’m sure that many people think I am wrong for advocating that morning after pills should legally be allowed to be used, but in my opinion I think doing so is the most effective strategy for reducing the total amount of harm that is caused by abortions under the circumstances, as well as for the other reasons I am explaining in this article.)

___

 

What is the difference between “medication abortions” and “emergency contraception”?

A “medication abortion” is when a patient takes a drug called mifepristone (also called “RU-486”), followed by a second drug called misoprostol to end a pregnancy rather than using a surgical abortion procedure.

“Emergency contraception” is different than medication abortion, where it prevents or delays one of the hormonal surges that triggers ovulation (the release of the eggs), thus “preventing” but not “ending” a pregnancy.  Shockingly (or rather not shockingly, unfortunately), some politicians have been attempting to outlaw even that!

[Note:  I would never support a politician who advocates for outlawing even contraception.  If a couple is opposed to using contraception for whatever reason then they should just choose not to use it.  I think people who want contraception to be illegal are ultimately “pro-abortion” whether they admit it or not.

I usually equate overly fundamentalist approaches with a person running onto a busy freeway with an assumption that their religion will automatically protect them from harm.]

___

 

The concept of “abortion courts” comprised of panels of doctors would be an effective solution with the abortion issue

[Note: This section was added July 2, 2022.]

I saw this meme yesterday, which led to me thinking of a concept of an “abortion court” that is comprised of a panel of doctors who would decide if an abortion can be allowed to happen or not (at least for later-term surgical abortions.)  That way, abortions could happen in the rare cases of women needing them for legitimate medical reasons, and it would not allow non-legitimate reasons being used as a loophole such as “she is depressed because of the pregnancy,” for example.  The proceedings of the panels should then also be made available for scrutiny by people in the local communities.

Obviously many other people must have had this idea as well, but I’m surprised that I’ve never heard of it before.  I wonder why a lot of people haven’t already been advocating for that since it would undoubtedly be a very effective solution to the problem.

___

 

Issues with “medication abortions” (meaning “morning-after pills”)

[Note:  I realize that many conservatives are opposed to the use of morning-after pills, but I think such people would be interested in reading his section anyway to become better informed about the specifics of the situation with it.  I offer my opinions in this section as well.]

Following are points from this Reuters Article:

— “Medication abortions” are induced when a patient takes a drug called mifepristone (that is also called “RU-486”), followed by a second drug called misoprostol to end her pregnancy rather than going through a surgical abortion procedure.  Over half of abortions in the U.S. are performed that way.

[Note:  I’m surprised to hear that only half of the abortions are preformed that way.  It is possible to have abortions in that manner until ten weeks into the pregnancy, therefore I wonder what is causing so many women to wait longer than that— where reportedly HALF of them are instead having traumatic later-term surgical abortions.  I hope that statistic is not correct.  In any event it doesn’t change my opinion that later term surgical abortions should not be allowed.  I don’t agree with the argument that later abortions must be available because women don’t always know they are pregnant right away, for example.  If a woman is sexually active then she should be proactive about checking if she is pregnant.]

— The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the abortion drug mifepristone in the year 2000, but until very recently the FDA mandated that patients must get it at a doctor’s office, clinic or hospital.

— Due to the Covid situation, in December 2021 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) permanently removed the requirement to dispense those abortion drugs in person, where people can now simply have the drugs mailed to them after an online video chat, which is a system known as “telemedicine.”

[Note:  I think it is horrifying that they are now allowing those drugs to simply be mailed to whoever requests them, despite their potential to be used to kill the children of unknowing pregnant women.  I think it is highly suspicious that the FDA (which also pushes vaccines that are proven to be useless and deadly) has permanently removed the requirement of taking such pills in the presence of a doctor.

It is essential to re-institute the requirement that such pills can only be dispensed in person by a physician due to such a danger.  I can imagine some people being opposed to that suggestion, where they may argue that people in “remote locations” need to have the pills mailed to them for example, but I think that trade-off isn’t worth it and some sort of an alternative could be figured out in such cases anyway.]

— The drugs are approved to work up until 10 weeks of pregnancy.

— The state of Indiana bans medication abortions at ten weeks, and Texas at seven weeks.

— Thirty-two states require that only physicians can dispense the abortion pills rather than people such as nurse practitioners.

— Nineteen states require that the dispensing clinician is in the patient’s physical presence, which essentially bans “telemedicine” abortion.  [Note:  I think this is very important, as I am mentioning elsewhere in this section.]

— Before the Supreme Court ruling, 13 states had “trigger laws” written to implement abortion laws as soon as Roe vs. Wade was overturned.

— At least 26 states are expected to pass new abortion laws due to the Supreme Court ruling.  Such states have so far not distinguished between surgical and medical abortions, therefore indicating that they will also likely ban medication abortions.

— Some states will ban all abortions almost entirely, while others will ban all abortions at six weeks to 15 weeks.

— The Democrat U.S. Senator Minnesota Tina Smith has introduced a bill that would ensure that “telemedicine” abortions would still be available in states where abortions are still allowed.

— It is not legal for a medical professional to prescribe pills via telemedicine to a woman in a state where they are illegal; however it is legal for a woman to travel to a state where telemedicine is legal, have an online telemedicine visit, and then have the medication mailed to an address in that state.

— From the article:

GenBioPro Inc, a company that sells mifepristone, has already challenged Mississippi’s restrictions on prescribing abortion pills via telemedicine by arguing that they are ‘preempted’ by the FDA, meaning that the federal approval of the drug overrides any state law.  There has not been a ruling in that case, which is pending in Mississippi federal court.

…

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland appeared to express support for that position in a statement on the Supreme Court’s June 24 ruling, saying that states ‘may not ban mifepristone based on disagreement with the FDA’s expert judgment about its safety and efficacy.’

Mississippi has argued that FDA approval cannot overcome the Supreme Court’s rulings granting states authority to regulate abortions.

[Note:  I think this is an important case.  While I support the availability of medication abortions, I strongly disagree with it being allowed to be available through the mail via telemedicine.  I hope that the FDA loses the case, but I also hope that Mississippi will allow medication abortions to be available via visits to a doctor.]

— People can also acquire abortion pills from other countries, but the practice is not legal.  However state authorities are saying they have no effective way of policing such orders from foreign doctors and pharmacies.  [Note:  I think those drugs should be a controlled substance and they could use drug-sniffing dogs to enforce not allowing them to be mailed to people, just as they are presumably doing with other illicit drugs.]

___

 

Related Topic:  The Supreme Court has been reversing previous rulings reinforcing the separation of church and state  [Additionally updated July 2, 2022]

[Note: July 1, 2022— I have re-written this section.]

I also notice that the Supreme Court has been reversing rulings about the separation of church and state.  For example they recently ruled in favor of a high school football coach who was fired for holding prayer sessions on the field during games.

Supporters of allowing religion in public schools point out that The First Amendment of the Constitution does not “prohibit” religion, but rather it does not “impede” it.  The Constitution was written to guarantee people their God-given rights, and it was also written based on Christian values even though Christianity was not specifically mentioned.

While I’m all for the propagation of Christian values, I do think the separation of church and state is an essential tenant of a free society.  If people want their religion to be a part of their school then they should go to a private school that caters to it, otherwise the public schools will soon be overrun with Islamic or even literally Satanic agendas, which is actually the real motivation for the precedents that are being set with the recent rulings regarding Christianity.

[Note: Updated July 13, 2022— As an example of unintended consequences of the rulings for Christians, today I found this video explaining the issue of a Saratoga, New York school district setting rooms aside for Muslim students to leave class to pray during schools hours.  (Note I have linked to the actual video.)]

The political Establishment is now attempting to make Christians think that it would only be a matter of allowing religion in the schools to fix the problems of the degradation of society, but I think it would be more effective to focus on other avenues for bringing Christian values back, such as raising awareness about the political Establishment being the most egregious source of the degradation of such values in the first place.

___

 

Conclusion

The abortion issue is one that the global elite is exploiting to cause conflict and division in order to achieve their nefarious goals.

The fact that very few voters understand what the “false left / right paradigm” is, and the fact that very few voters understand what the global elite’s real agendas are results in enabling the elite to easily implement their harmful agendas on the United States and the rest of the world.

Despite the issues with it, I’m glad that Roe vs. Wade was overturned to give abortion decisions to the states, which I think will significantly reduce the amount of abortions that will be performed.

I respect the views of pro-life purists, but I do not think it is practical to ban all abortions.  I am in favor of banning later term abortions, however.  All abortions are a tragedy, but I think if an abortion is to happen, it should happen as soon in the pregnancy as possible.

Most voters will not support total abortion bans, and conservatives attempting to force that issue will result in many Republican politicians losing elections, thus resulting in empowering harmful leftist candidates— all of which has been strategized to occur by the global elite.

If more people become better informed about the harmful motives and methods the global elite, then they will be able to make better choices, which will result in the people of the world ultimately being more healthy and happy.

I’ve recently become aware of a YouTube channel called “A Call for An Uprising” that talks about issues with the Illuminati and many of its agendas such as Covid and the associated vaccines.  It covers a fairly wide range of topics.

Their information that I’ve seen so far is informative.  The view counts on their videos are relatively low, but I think it is likely due to YouTube shadow banning the videos. 

[Note: I don’t like the opening animation that they show before their videos.  I think it is rather blasphemous to Christianity despite having pro-Christianity intentions.  The animation had put me off from posting their information previously.

Additional note:  As far as I’ve seen their videos contain good information, although they seem to contain some rather large gaps in the issues that they talk about, such as apparently not mentioning issues with immigration or Islam.  I think talking about both of those topics are crucial to the big picture.  Of course it is their prerogative to do what they want to do, however.  (Note if people are uncomfortable with my organizations talking about all such issues they should choose not to be involved with them, I’m interested in what people think but it can’t be a lopsided approach.)]

This video explains likely ulterior motives of Roe v. Wade being overturned, talking about how the issue is almost certainly being exploited for the purpose of polarizing the country as a part of destroying the U.S. in order to usher in the New World Order.  Of course none of the Supreme Court judges would have been appointed if they wouldn’t be doing exactly what they are being told to do by the Global Elite.  The video also speculates about ulterior motives of the Court concurrently allowing more people access to guns, but I do think it is good that more people will be able to acquire guns to protect themselves nonetheless.

[Note:  I think such situations can be diffused and even changed if more people are made to be better informed.  I think many leftists can be woken up to how dishonest and corrupt their side is if they are communicated with properly— it is not really a “difference of opinion” between left and right but rather mostly one of truthfulness and health.  Many people who assume that they support leftist views simply haven’t been paying enough attention to what is happening and thus they are uninformed or misinformed.]

[Note: July 2, 2022— I have changed the text of this article by removing quotes.]

In this video Alex Jones explains how the pro-choice movement is literally full of Satan worshipers who perform human sacrifices, and he explains how some states are starting to institute even POST-birth abortions.

A typical ridiculous “Handmaids Tail” analogy that feminists often attempt to make.  The Handmaids Tale is actually likely an allegory for Islam, although most leftists are not aware of that or they don’t care.

The U.S. Supreme Court has overturned the 50 year old Roe vs. Wade ruling, thus allowing states to make their own laws about abortions.

Leftist media outlets such as NPR and all of the typical Establishment celebrities have been trying to portrait the decision as if abortion has been outlawed in the U.S. altogether, and leftist groups are going crazy over the issue— undoubtedly all in an attempt to help entrench the support of naive leftists for Democrat candidates who also support other harmful anti-American agendas such as open borders.

Many leftists are threatening violence over the ruling, after many leftist terrorist attacks have already been occurring at pro-life clinics, and the houses of Supreme Court judges are also being attacked.

The outdoor clothing company Patagonia is even vowing to pay the bail of its employees who are arrested at pro-abortion protests.

Abortion was never a constitutional right as the right to bear arms is, yet many leftists such as the Masonic Boule associated Mayor of Chicago Lori Lightfoot have been trying to dishonestly draw a parallel between the two issues, falsely claiming that the Supreme Court is being hypocritical by recently overriding state laws that ban guns while also now allowing states to decide for themselves about abortion.

[Update:  I saw this “Unicorn Riot” article that lies in its first sentence claiming that abortion is a “constitutional right,” which it is not.  Joe Biden also made the same dishonest claim in his speech about the issue. 

This article explains that such people attempt to claim that the Fourth Amendment’s “protection of privacy” means that “abortion is protected by the constitution,” which obviously is not a valid interpretation.  Leftists lie about everything.]

The Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison, another (almost certainly) Masonic Boule member incorrectly claimed that the court is “Illegitimate” due to the ruling.

And another almost certainly Boule member Elie Mystal said on MSNBC, “At a basic level, if you want rights in this country under this conservative Supreme Court, you’d better be a cis-hetero White man or an Uzi.  Because those are the two things that this court believes, have rights.”  However of course everything he said is untrue.

A Tweet by Boston’s Mayor Michelle Wu announcing the appointment of Yusufi Vali as her Deputy Chief of Staff.

Following is a summary of an Islamism.news article that I found on Jihad Watch.

— The Boston Mayor Michelle Wu has appointed Yusufi Vali as her Deputy Chief of Staff, who is someone that used to head the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) which a 2016 report detailed as being one of the most radical mosques on the East coast, and he was also the trustee of the Boston branch of the Muslim American Society (MAS) which was designated as a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates.

— Federal prosecutors wrote in 2008 that MAS was founded as the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America.  Speakers at a MAS conference openly glorified terrorism in 2019, and the Philadelphia branch of the MAS made national headlines after it held an event in 2019 where children sang songs of Jihad and beheadings of Jews.

In this video, children in a 2019 assembly at the Philadelphia branch of the MAS sing songs of Jihad and beheadings.  [Also see this article about that matter.]

— MAS’s Boston branch was previously headed by Yusuf Al Qaradawi, an infamously-extreme spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and admirer of Adolf Hitler, as well as Abdulrahman Alamoudi, who is an Al Qaeda fundraiser that was jailed in 2004 for conspiring with the Libyan regime to assassinate the Saudi Crown Prince.

In this video, Yusuf Al Qaradaw praises Hitler and the Holocaust.

Vali himself has close associations with many Islamic extremists, who he has featured in dozens of Islamic events, such as the following:

— In 2015, a speaker Mufti Hussain Kamani at an ISB organized conference reiterated the Islamic beliefs that a Muslim man may only fulfill his sexual desires “with his spouse..[or] with a sex slave that belongs to him.”  He also said that those who have sex outside of those situations must be stoned to death.  Kamani was joined by Abdul Nasir Jangda, who also defends the use of sex slaves within Islam, advocates for killing apostates and adulterers, and affirms the Islamic belief that wives cannot refuse having sex with their husbands.  Vali appears to be a close acquaintance of both Islamists.

— In 2016, Vali oversaw the appointment of an overtly anti-Jewish associate Imam named Abdul-Malik Merchant, who has posted anti-Semitic Islamic scripture online such as saying “Oh assembly of Jews!  You are the most disgusting of the creation to me.  You killed the prophets of Allah…,” and he also posted hostile anti-homosexual messages on Facebook posts.

… Vali has never explained or renounced his associations with such people, and over the past decade he has been closely associated with leading politicians in Massachusetts, as the following points explain:

— In 2016, Vali organized an event at the ISB with Senator Elizabeth Warren and Boston’s previous Mayor Marty Walsh.  Americans for Peace and Tolerance produced a photo of Walsh at the event shaking the hand of Abdullah Faaruug, a local imam who has championed an Al-Qaeda operative Aafia Siddiqui (who plotted attacks for mass casualties in New York City and tried to murder federal agents in Afghanistan) as a “brave woman,” and he even raised funds on her behalf.  Faaruug also defended the Al Qaeda supporter Tarek Mehanna while he was awaiting trail on terrorism charges, and in response to their arrests he encouraged violence, urging Muslims to “grab onto the gun and the sword.”

— Elizabeth Warren later ran in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primary and Walsh now serves as Biden’s Labor secretary.  Both politicians campaigned against the so-called “Muslim Ban” implemented by the Trump administration between 2016 and 2019, where they took part in protests and photo-ops around the state involving groups such as ISB and the [(terrorism linked)] Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

— Many other high ranking Boston officials have also been openly associating with Jihadists in recent years without being questioned about it by the media, such a the current Republican Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker.  Islamists have been using such connections for political appointments, such as Nadeem Mazen, who is a former Cambridge city councilor, congressional candidate, and the founder of JETPAC, which is a Massachusetts nonprofit that works to “build American Muslim political infrastructure.”  Such activity is serving as a blueprint for Islamists who are seeking election or appointment to office in other major cities as well.

The Missouri Republican Senate candidate Eric Greitens made an ad showing him going “RINO hunting,” where he along with soldiers kicked down the door of a house and threw a flash-bang grenade inside it.  By “RINO” he means Republican politicians who are act like Democrats (“Republican In Name Only.”)  He also made reference to supporting Donald Trump by saying people should “join the MAGA crew.”

In the ad he said, “I’m Eric Greitens, Navy SEAL, and today we’re going RINO hunting.  The RINO feeds on corruption and is marked by the stripes of cowardice.  Join the MAGA crew.  Get a RINO hunting permit.  There’s no bagging limit, no tagging limit and it doesn’t expire until we save our country.”

It’s great to be against RINOs, but his approach is inappropriate and counterproductive.  I think he is obviously controlled opposition such as Margery Taylor Greene is.  Advocating for using the military to hunt politicians that he disagrees with is a bad idea and it will cause big problems.  If he was for real he wouldn’t have resorted to such a tactic.

I do agree with the following ad by the Arizona politician Jim Lamon, however.  But many leftists tried to capitalize on it by falsely claiming that he “shot” Pelosi and Biden, such as this article, this article, and this article.

I saw the above Natural News video that is talking about issue of most cryptocurrencies currently being very low in value.  I disagree with most of what the video is saying however, because people who recently lost money should have realized the risk of what they are investing in, and they should have known how to guard against the dangers of periods of time when it falls in value.  It is a sad situation when people lose money while investing in cryptocurrency, but ultimately it is their fault.

It doesn’t matter that “the coins are not backed by anything of intrinsic value” as the video says, people simply need to realize that fact and invest and make use of the currency accordingly.  Also Dogecoin never pretended to be anything other than a “memecoin,” but its value at any point in time is genuine because you can exchange it for traditional currency.

Cryptocurrency is not a safe investment if you plan to simply buy it and wait for the price to hopefully rise over a long period of time.  You cannot treat it as if it is a stock in a company, which is something that is completely different.  You should invest in stocks instead if you want to invest in such manner.

You can still make money with cryptocurrency if you pay attention to what is happening and respond to the market conditions, therefore making use of its volatility.  For example if you sell when it starts to go below a certain value you will at least not lose much money, however if you simply do nothing while it sinks in value you will lose your shirt if its value won’t rise again.  You can’t go wrong by selling cryptocurrency when its value starts to go down because you can simply buy it again after its value starts to rise once more.  Therefore the current hype about it supposedly being “always unsafe” is not accurate unless you are recklessly not paying attention to the market conditions.  As long as you truly know what you are doing and you are keeping on top of it, it can be a viable method of investing.  (Also I suggest making sure to keep in mind the general trend of what is happening— meaning sell your holdings when it is generally a bear market and start buying again after it is clear that it has become a bull market once again.)  And of course there could be no worse idea than using cryptocurrency as a savings account!

As an example, people who were paying attention to what was happening with Elon Musk and Twitter recently could have timed investing in Dogecoin and then sold it after it spiked in value and started to drop again, thus making a large amount of profit in the process.  For investors who are knowledgeable and savvy enough to do such a thing, cryptocurrency will always be an effective way to make money.

Be aware that investing in cryptocurrency is very risky though and you must take the time to learn as much as possible before you start to invest in it.  If you are not very computer savvy, and not entirely familiar with all the nuts and bolts of how such investing works, you will almost certainly lose your money.

In any event, cryptocurrency is always important for its originally intended purpose even when it dips in value— which is to be an alternative method of making online payments.  This is especially important due to the fact that online credit card payment processor companies often don’t allow payments to be made to people who talk about issues that the political Establishment doesn’t want to be known, such as to people who criticize issues with Islam.  A recent example of that is MasterCard and the online fund raising platform GoFundMe stopping allowing payments to be made to the peaceful and accurate anti-Islamization activist Robert Spencer, where such blockages are instructed by corrupt Establishment organizations such as The Southern Poverty Law Center that make slanderous accusations of “hate speech” in order to give the political Establishment an excuse to shut people down who are standing up to its corrupt agendas.  (Also see this article talking about issues with a similar organization The Anti-Defamation League.)

A sixteen year convicted felon in Los Angeles who stole a car and intentionally ran over a woman and her eight month old son in a stroller and fled the scene was given only five months in a “diversionary program” by a judge.

This article explains that the Los Angeles DA George Gascón is trying to claim that criticism of him about the ruling is “misinformation” and the teen was charged as harshly as legally allowed, where he ridiculously said, “Contrary to what some have claimed, it is not ‘attempted murder’ under CA law.  To charge that offense, our office would have to be able to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, the minor specifically intended to kill the victims.  There was no evidence of that.”— However anyone who has seen the footage and heard the testimony of the the victim can tell that it was obviously done with homicidal intent.

[Note it is disappointing to hear that the victim is remaining a Democrat even after going through such an ordeal, she should know better and realize that the Democrats are the source of such problems.]

The same D.A. George Gascón recently made L.A. county pay for the funeral of a man who killed two police officers after he was let out on a plea deal that gave him only ten days in jail rather than three years, as explained in this article.

And of course it should not be a surprise that Gascón is a supporter of the corrupt BLM organization as well.

In this video, Paul Nielson critiques a deceitful presentation by an Islam apologist Mehdi Hasan, where Hasan falsely claims that Islam is a basis of Western science including even the European Renaissance.  A “woke” leftist audience is enthusiastically cheering what Hasan is saying in the video.

Nielson explains that Islam actually had nothing to do with such contributions of scientific thought, but rather key people who were living in newly Islamized areas were entirely influenced by previous cultures such as Greece and India, and Islam actually attempted to persecute and impede the works of such people.  Therefore such people accomplished what did what they did despite Islam, not because of it. 

He explains that the time period of the supposed “Golden Age of Islamic Science” should actually be called “The Final Breath of the Classical Civilizations (After the Muslims Destroyed Them.)”

Followings are points that Nielson made:

— When Islam emerged from the Arabian Peninsula, they subjugated areas that used to belong to the Greek Christian world that were already completely immersed in thousands of years of scientific thought and achievements.

— Islam was actually entirely anti-science, where the law of “cause of effect” was rejected and thus Islam was not capable of engaging in scientific thought.  Muslims believed that “cause and effect” wasn’t valid because they thought that Allah could recreate the world in any manner whenever he wanted to.

— When Islam subjugated the classical world, they burned most of the literature that they came across. For example when they conquered Alexandria, Egypt in 640, they destroyed all of the literature that they could find, erasing the legacy and scientific accomplishments of that highly advanced area.

— When Islam conquered India, they burned all the writings in the Library of Nalanda, which was the largest accumulation of knowledge in that part of the world.

— Muslims reasoned: “If it is not something that is not also written in the Quran, then destroy it because that means it is not important.”  And they also even reasoned: “If it is something that can be found in there Quran, destroy it anyway because we already have it in the Quran.”

— The Islam apologist Mehdi Hasan giving the speech in the above video mentioned various people who are examples of “sources of significant Islamic scientific thought,” however none of them are valid examples since they based their thoughts entirely on previous cultures and they were also considered to be heretics in Islam, as Nielson explains:

— Ibn Rushd was a man in Islamic Spain who was fascinated by Greek though and he wished to open Islam to such concepts, but his thoughts were entirely heretical to Islam, so he ended up being prosecuted and most of the literature he created was burned.  A small part of his work that didn’t get burned ended up in the hands of European thinkers who translated his work.  His translated work caused Europeans to falsely associate the Islamic world with Greek heritage, which was a misconception that was not corrected until much later.  The above Islam apologist Hasan called Ibn Rushd “the father of the European Renaissance and Enlightenment” due to his works influencing key people such as Thomas Aquinas, however that is definitely an exaggeration since people such as Aquinas were influenced by many other people as well.  And even if Rushd could be thought of as “a father of such thought”, his thoughts were entirely the result of Greek thought that preceded him, such as Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates, therefore making them be the actual “fathers” of the Renaissance.

— Ibn Sina is another philosopher that is mentioned by Muslim activists, who was born in 980 in a region of the Middle East that still retained its Persian intellectual heritage despite being conquered by Islam.  He was highly influenced by other cultures such and Greece and India, and he contributed advancements in medical science that was adopted by many Europeans.  However, since his thoughts were science-based he was denounced as a “Kaffir” (a derogatory term for a non-Muslim) by Muslims, but high ranking Muslims kept him around anyway because of his usefulness.

— al-Khwarizmi is often claimed to be the founder of Algebra, but he also came from the non-Islamic Persian tradition and he also studied Greek philosophy and Indian mathematics.  His work found its way to Europe where it became adopted.

— As the above examples explain, the supposed “Golden Age of Islamic Science” was merely a period in time when a handful of Islamic individuals were translating Greek works into Arabic and they were studying Indian mathematics, therefore the time period should actually be called “The Final Breath of the Classical Civilizations (after the Muslims destroyed it.)”  Calling it the “Golden Age of Islamic Science” is actually disrespectful to the previous societies that were destroyed by Islam.

— There is only a list of about five such Islamic “thinkers”, however other much smaller regions such as localized areas of Europe each gave rise to hundreds of equally or more significantly historically influential people.

— Those few Islamic people could have to helped transform the Islamic culture and been its “enlightenment thinkers,” but that was never allowed by Islam’s closed-minded mentality, therefore the only influence they had was completely outside of Islam.

— If you look at the condition of Islamic countries today, it is readily apparent that they have essentially no significant scientific traditions compared with other cultures in the world, due to the unyielding rigidity of the Islamic culture.

 

Watch this historically accurate walk through of the Parthenon in classical Greece, which predated Islam by well over a thousand years.  This along with Indian thought is the actual source of most of the ideas behind the supposed “Golden Age of Islamic Science.”

See other videos about the various time periods in ancient Greece at this page.

See the article A Summary of Islam Issues for other articles about Islam.

See Paul Nielson’s YouTube Channel at this link.

Image from Wikipedia.

I recently saw this ridiculous opinion piece on a pro-freedom right wing European website ReMix, however I can’t imagine how such an article would find an appreciative audience on that outlet.  It is written by a Hungarian professor Maria Schmidt who claims that the EU has “lost its self-representation and has become completely Americanized.”  I’ve found the ReMix website recently, and I have otherwise agreed with a number of articles that I’ve seen on it, such as this one, and this one.

In her opinion piece she claims that “America” is the cause of the problems in the Europe, due to Europe’s “unquestioning worship of the West.”  She cites the recent conflict in Ukraine, saying that Europe’s problems are due to it being subservient to the U.S.

She says, “Europe’s Western European opinion-makers, academic and media workers, and political elites are completely Americanized.  Their cultural preferences, themes and ambitions are indistinguishable from those of the American motherland.”

The agendas she is identifying as problems don’t really originate in the U.S. however, but rather they mostly originate in Europe.  The global elite are “global” and they don’t live in any one particular country.  It is true that America is often implemented as a weapon by such people, but that doesn’t make America the “cause” of the problems.

The Russia / Ukraine conflict is ultimately controlled on both sides by the same people, as all such conflicts are.  Putin is Illuminati controlled opposition, as essentially all world leaders are.  This doesn’t mean that fighting in that region isn’t actually happening though (although apparently at least some and perhaps many of the reported conflicts in that war are a hoax.)

George Soros who is behind funding harmful leftist groups such as Antifa and BLM is a Hungarian and he lived in that country until very recently.  So according to her type of reasoning, shouldn’t she be saying that “Hungarian-ism” is destroying America and the rest of the world and not the other way around?  (Actually most of the people in that country and other Eastern European countries are smart enough to be opposed to such agendas though, and they should be applauded for that.)

She then made a ridiculous statement attempting to claim that Germany’s problems are caused by the US: “It is frightening to see how vulnerable Germany, with its 80 million inhabitants, has become, how unable it is to resist the suicidal policies imposed by the ruling gerontocrats of the USA.”  Germany has been implementing fascist anti-free speech laws and catastrophic out of control immigration policies— but according to her the U.S. is the cause of its problems!

 

Following are videos that explain the most significant problems in Europe.  None of the problems have anything to do with “Americanism”:

This video explains the configuration of the EU, which all Europeans should be ashamed of.  It explains how most otherwise well-educated Europeans don’t even really know who is representing them, among other issues.

(Unfortunately the video doesn’t address the catastrophic immigration situation that is occurring on the continent, and in fact it attempts to create a false impression that people who are concerned about that problem are hostile extremists.)

 

This video by the Dutch activist Paul Nielson explains that Eastern Europe will soon become the new “Western Europe” due to the healthy nationalistic attitudes of the people in those countries, while Western European countries are being destroyed by harmful leftist agendas.

 

This video explains the global elite’s agenda of emasculating the people in Europe out of existence through trying to turn them into homosexuals.

Also see this article that explains the real meaning of “left wing” and “right wing.”

___

Most Americans aren’t aware of the catastrophic problems that are occurring in Europe due to the out of control Islamic immigration that is happening there, which is enabled by a media blackout about the topic.   Following are some videos that explain the situation.   (Also see the article “A Summary of Islam Related Issues” that contains more information about the matter.)

This video “Muslim Demographics” has been popular since 2009 talking about the situation of the native populations of Europe being increasingly replaced by the incoming populations of mostly Muslim immigrants.

The video supplies a lot of statistics, and debunkers have found minor issues with a few of its facts, yet the premise of the video is sound nonetheless.  See its video page for an examination of issues that a BBC video claims to have found with it.

 

This segment from the Black Pigeon Speaks video “Creeping Sharia: The Islamization of the West” explains what happens to societies during their various stages of being replaced by Islamic populations.

 

This video contains a compilation of video footage of the out of control Islamic immigration that is happening in Europe.  See its video page at this link.

 

This video shows the shocking situation outside of the large Calais refugee camp in France in 2015.  The camp was located close to the entry of the Channel Tunnel into England.

I have re-edited this from the original video that I found on the internet.  See its video page at this link.