I remember seeing an article about a public school that sent a message home about “white privilege,” and I made a joke, “You know you are sending your kids to a crappy school if they send a message like that home to parents.” I said it as a joke, but I do feel that way though. I think that is totally inappropriate and even a racist message for a school to send out to parents.
This isn’t to say that black people aren’t often disadvantaged though. But there is an important distinction between black people being “disadvantaged” and white people supposedly being “privileged.”
I saw an Establishment-created article a while ago that listed various examples of “white privilege,” and I thought some were legitimate examples of black people being disadvantaged, but many were not. For example it said, “Black people feel that they need to have a bag for their purchases when they leave the convenience store,” however that is not being “disadvantaged” but rather it is simply their own neurosis.
People who espouse the concept of “white privilege” are often corrupt cultural Marxists who are being “told” what to say by the political Establishment. The reason for that is because they want black people to think that the damaged state of their neighborhoods is the “normal baseline standard” rather than “abnormal”— that way they create animosity towards white people and distract black people from identifying their Democrat leadership as covertly being what is actually the cause of almost all of their problems. The corrupt “Black Lives Matter” movement is a perfect example of such an anti-black agenda, where it knowingly tricks people into thinking that the police have a “homicidal bias” when in fact they do not. See this link, this link, and this link about that.
Two Syrian asylum seekers were arrested in the city of Waghäusel, Germany after pushing a 54-year-old German in front of an oncoming train, seriously injuring him.
The incident took place last week on Tuesday evening, but the suspects were not arrested until two days later at their asylum accommodations after being identified by police. The attackers are brothers who are 25 and 22 years old.
The elder brother randomly assaulted the German man for no reason and pushed him onto the tracks, and he would not let him escape as an oncoming train approached, which hit the man and caused serious injuries. The victim suffered a deep wound, a thigh fracture, and several other broken bones from being hit by the train. The attack is being treated as attempted murder by the public prosecutor.
Also in 2019, a Bosnian migrant in Germany killed a 34-year-old woman by pushing her in front of a train, and in 2018 an asylum seeker in Germany tried to kill a five-year-old by grabbing him and jumping in the path of a train.
Rodney Muhammad, the chief of the NAACP’s mosque, will not be fired for posting this meme on his Facebook page.
Following is based on information from this July 24 PBS article:
The head of the Philadelphia NAACP Rodney Muhammad recently posted an anti-Semitic meme on his Facebook page which made reference to black celebrities who have recently been criticized for making anti-Semitic statements in the media. The meme suggested that the blowback and apologies for the statements they made were a part of a grand scheme orchestrated by “Jews.” Muhammed is also an Islamic minister at the Mosque No. 12 in Philadelphia.
Muhammad removed the post after being contacted by a reporter, initially saying that he didn’t remember sharing it, and he later acknowledged posting the meme but said that he didn’t realize that it was offensive to Jewish people, and finally he expressed his true attitudes which were his motivation for posting it.
The Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia Director Laura Frank condemned Muhammad’s post and called for the NAACP to remove him from his leadership position, saying, “This vile behavior from a civic leader is incredibly dangerous for Jewish communities across the world.”
A rabbi Linda Holtzman of a leftist Jewish organization Tikkun Olam Chavurah in Philadelphia said the image makes her nauseated since it is clearly an anti-Semitic trope, and she said it shows the need for “more dialogue” between the Black and Jewish communities whether it was knowingly anti-Semitic or not.
However, shockingly she also said “the Black community is justly angered at the Jewish community” because Jewish people aren’t enough of activists for blacks.
She said, “In the Jewish world, we will often rest on our laurels and say ‘Oh, we marched with MLK and we were there in the civil rights movement in the 1960s, therefore we’re somehow exempt from needing to do anything more and it shows we’re not racist. .. I understand somebody being angry at a group of people who says, ‘Oh no, I’m completely with you,’ and then don’t act that way, or are not clear in their support unequivocally. I think the Black community is justly angry at the Jewish community.”
She then suggested that if Muhammad was not genuinely aware of the image’s connotations, then it would be an opportunity to educate him as to why Jews find it offensive.
Muhammad then did explain that he understood the meme’s context though, where he said black celebrities are being shut down for what what he calls “expressing free-thinking curiosity,” and he claimed that he did not ascribe blame to the “Jewish community,” but rather to “members of it in agencies with other agendas” who he said use anti-Semitism as a label to condemn people.
He said, “They use is as a trick, if you’re in Europe and you criticize any of them like that, or if you’re in America, it’s anti-Semitism.”
A July 30, 2020 Forward.com article gave an update about the matter, explaining that he will not be fired from his position with the NAACP. Following is a summary of selected information from the article:
The Philadelphia president of the NAACP Rodney Muhammad will not be fired for posting an anti-Semitic meme on Facebook, but rather the NAACP has announced it has decided for him to “meet with community leaders and faith leaders to open a dialogue,” and to “[launch] national conversations to further understanding.”
However, Muhammad’s Facebook page for the Mosque where he is minister is still filled with anti-Semitic posts, such as the following: “Those of you who say that you are Jews, I will not give you the honor of calling you a Jew; you are not a Jew! You’re So-Called [a Jew], you are Satan and it is my job now to pull the cover off of Satan so that every Muslim, when he sees Satan, [will/should] pick up a stone.”
As I’ve mentioned previously, I plan to have my organizations present both “pro-life” and “pro-choice” viewpoints by creating articles for each of the opposing arguments. I think that issue is not (necessarily) one that involves a lot of “deception” but rather much of it is a “difference of opinion,” therefore I think having two articles that present opposing viewpoints is a good idea. I think such an “opposing viewpoint” format could be able to work with other topics as well if there is enough interest in doing that, but in any event all of the articles are already usually the result of examining as many sides of the issues as possible.
Personally I’m opposed to abortion and I think it should be avoided at all costs, but I think politicians attempting to make it entirely illegal will not work due to public opposition to that, and in fact them trying to do that will have very harmful repercussions where dangerous leftist agendas will be empowered as a side-effect, as I explain more in detail later in this article.
In a recent article I criticized Kanye West for statements that he made at a speech, but I do agree with some of the things that he said. For example I think it is good that he spoke out against abortion.
I recently received a “Planned Parenthood” mailer where it said a local congressman is “putting our health at risk” because he voted for “the most restrictive abortion ban in the country” which would have banned abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Note though that the “most restrictive ban” would have been after 20 weeks into the pregnancy— Not 20 days for example, but 20 weeks! Do many people really think that is unreasonable?
I think late term abortions are abhorrent, and I think they should be illegal unless the woman’s life is (truly) in danger; however I’m also opposed to political candidates running on “100% pro-life platforms” when there is not nearly enough public support for them to do so— which ultimately only leads to empowering the harmful agendas of their leftist opposition.
(Note that in the above linked article I talk about a large group of politicians in Alabama who passed the 100% pro-life “Human Life Protection Act” which outlaws all types of abortions in all circumstances. The article previously had a picture of many of the politicians with a Masonic “stamp” on it, but I don’t actually know if all of those politicians are Freemasons, so I changed the image and I published a retraction about that. I’m looking forward to the resolution so that people will be able to look over articles and make suggestions before they are posted. But I should have been more careful with that in any event, I usually am in such cases. It will be interesting to hear people’s opinions about the existing articles on the websites in general. I think all of the information as a whole is very accurate and relevant, and it communicates very important information.)
As I was saying, people should be aware that sometimes politicians and activists who “claim” to support a certain position sometimes are actually trying to covertly empower the opposition to it. For example gun disarmament activists sometimes brandish weapons in public to try to frighten people into outlawing guns (that is almost certainly happening here, here, and here) which is one of the reasons that I usually don’t support “open carry” laws even though I am a staunch gun rights advocate.
Many people are dupes or servants of the corrupt political Establishment, where they have either been falsely led to believe that they are ultimately “empowering good” with their subversive activities; or they are knowingly corrupt and they have been falsely led to believe that they will be exempt from the evil subjugation that they are helping to bring to fruition. Did “good” come about though the people living in Nicaragua being enslaved and killed by Communism, for example?— Of course not! (And note that the same sort of situation will soon likely be happening in the U.S. as well. I highly recommend reading the actual summarized chapters of that article, it is very shocking and disturbing information.)
