Hillary Clinton defended and exonerated a man who she knew was guilty of brutally raping a 12 year old girl

In this video, Paul Watson of Infowars.com explains how Hillary Clinton defended a man who brutally raped a twelve year old girl and then laughed about helping him to get away with it.

Kathy Shelton was beaten and raped on the side of a desolate Arkansas road by 41 year old Thomas Alfred Tailor in 1975, and he was defended by a young Hillary Clinton who set out to destroy Cathy Shelton’s credibility by smearing her.

Hillary claimed the victim was “emotionally unstable,” had “fantasized about having sex with older men,” and she “romanticized the experience” despite the fact that Shelton spent five days in a coma and ten years in therapy after the attack.  Hillary Clinton— the so-called “woman’s rights champion”— blamed the rape victim.

Its is shown that the crime lab cut out a part of Shelton’s underwear to test it and found body fluids of Tailor mixed in with Shelton’s blood.  So Hillary Clinton took the rest of the underwear absent the part that had already been cut out and had it tested 1,200 miles away in New York, where it tested negative— and then the initial part of the underwear became “mysteriously lost.”  Also the judge in the case was a Clinton Campaign donor.

Due to Hillary’s actions, the prosecution had to pursue lesser charges and the rapist only ended up serving two months in jail when he should have been imprisoned for life.

Clinton was then recorded saying about the incident: “Oh, he plea bargained!  Got him off with time served in the county jail, he’d been in the county jail about two months.”

Then in 2014, a tape emerged where Hillary was heard laughing about the moment when she presented her forensic evidence, saying “Well, this guy’s ready to come from New York to prevent this miscarriage of Justice! [laughs]”  And on the same tape, she said, “He took a lie detector test!  I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs. [ laughs] … But what was sad about it is that the prosecutors had evidence.”

Also see this Daily Mail UK article about the issue.