Author: email@edwardulrich.com

Brannon Howse speaks with Trevor Loudon, the author of the book “White House Reds: Communist and Socialist Security Risks Running for President, 2020,” where Loudon explains the frightening reality of the extreme Communist “Democratic Socialists of America” movement encroaching in American politics and the associated Cultural Marxist agendas that are being propagated with it.  Loudon explains why the upcoming Presidential election will be entirely a choice of “Communism vs freedom.”

(View the actual video at this link.)

In this video, Brannon Howse speaks with Trevor Loudon, the author of the book “White House Reds: Communist and Socialist Security Risks Running for President, 2020,” where they discuss the situation of churches in the West being usurped by the leftist political Establishment.

Howse and Loudon compare the current situation with what happened during World War II where the German churches compromised their ideals to be aligned with the leftist Nazi party, explaining that even Evangelical churches today aren’t standing up for their values but instead are increasingly “going along to get along” with Establishment dictated leftist “politically correct” agendas.

Howse explains that traditionally conservative Southern Baptist churches are turning into Establishment “community organization” social service centers rather than preaching traditional Christianity, being socialism masquerading as Christianity which is what he calls “Marxianity.”

Loudon explains that the political Establishment always seeks to infiltrate where “money, influence, and respectably” exist in order to subjugate societies, which makes churches so appealing to them because they have all of those characteristics.

David Wood explains that the boxer Muhammad Ali was duped into believing Islam is something that it is not.

Dogs in are considered to be “haram” (taboo) in Islam, and thus they are often tortured and killed in Islamic countries.  Dogs are permitted in Islam for hunting and herding sheep, but in all other cases they are not.  Dogs are not allowed in the houses of Muslims, and black dogs are thought to be “a devil.”

This article explains how the U.S. has ceased supplying bomb-sniffing dogs to Muslim countries due to the dogs being abused by their handlers, how Muslim cab drivers in Western countries frequently refuse to drive passengers with disabilities who have guide dogs, an example is shown of how dogs in Islamic countries are often tortured and killed, and specific Islamic writings are shown that are the basis for such attitudes.

 

THE ISSUE OF BOMB SNIFFING DOGS ON LOAN TO THE MIDDLE EAST BEING ABUSED BY THEIR MUSLIM HANDLERS

In 2019 the United States has recently banned the transfer of military-trained bomb-sniffing dogs to the Middle East due to such dogs routinely being abused by their Muslim handlers.  See this Breitbart article (where the above images came from) and this Judicial Watch article about the topic.

 

MUSLIM CAB DRIVERS IN THE WEST FREQUENTLY REFUSE TO DRIVE DISABLED PASSENGERS WHO HAVE GUIDE DOGS

Following are some mainstream news reports of Muslim cab drivers refusing to drive passengers who have guide dogs:

The above footage of a Somalian taxi driver in England refusing to take a passenger who had a guide dog, which eventually led to the cab company saying they will no longer give the cabbie work, but with him still free to work for any other cab company.  See a 2016 DailyMail article about the matter.

A 2018 Leichstershire Live article explains that a man boarded a cab with his guide dog in Leicestershire, UK, which sent the Muslim cabbie into a frenzy and made him promptly demand that he get out.  The passenger then filed a complaint with the local magistrate and the cabbie pleaded not guilty, saying the dog licked the gear stick and would have potentially triggered the hand brake.

A 68 year old sight impaired woman with her dog were refused a ride in a Worchester UK Taxi, according to a 2019 Worchester News article.

In the above 2019 Tampa, Florida news report, a blind woman explains that she was told by a cabbie that she needed to “put her dog in the trunk.”  See the link for the report as well.

A 2019 Swindon Advertiser article says that a survey shows that 75% of blind people in the UK have been told that they cannot use a taxi or they have been disallowed from entering a shop or restaurant.

In 2019, a Muslim cab driver lost his license after he refused to pick up a blind man and his dog from a pub in Nottingham, UK.  See a Metro.co.uk article.

A 2020 British Columbia, Canada Surrey Now-Leader article explains that a cab drove past a sight disabled man when it saw that he had a guide dog.

 

DOGS ARE FREQUENTLY TORTURED AND KILLED IN ISLAMIC COUNTRIES

Warning: This is an extremely disturbing video.  It shows dogs and puppies on the streets of Iran being killed with acid being injected into them.  Instead of using a humane method to euthanize the dogs, an acid is used in the video which is the least expensive poison that makes the dogs cry out in horrible agony as they die.

 

PASSAGES FROM THE QURAN AND HADITH THAT DICTATE NEGATIVE MUSLIM ATTITUDES TOWARD DOGS

The Angel Gabriel allegedly said: “.. We do not enter a house in which there is a dog or an image.”  Sahih Muslim 5511/81 (2104)

“It was narrated from Ibn ‘Umar that the Messenger of Allah ordered that dogs be killed.”  Sahih Muslim 4016/43 (1570)

“It was narrated that ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar said: ‘The Messenger of Allah used to order that dogs be killed, and I went throughout Al-Madinah, and we did not spare any dog but we killed it, to such an extent that we would even kill the dog of a woman belonging to the desert people.”  Sahih Muslim describes 4018/45

[Note: After some of Muhammad’s followers complained about the ruling of killing dogs due to their using dogs for hunting and herding sheep, Muhammad gave the following command:]  “It was narrated that Ibn al-Mughaffal said: ‘The Messenger of Allah enjoined the killings of dogs, then he said: ”What is the problem with them and dogs?“  Then he granted concession with regard to dogs for hunting and herding sheep.’”

“.. [a man’s] prayer will be interrupted if a donkey, a woman, or a black dog passes in front of him. … What is the difference between a black dog, and a red or yellow dog?  He said: “O son of my brother, I asked the Messenger of Allah the same question, and he said ‘the black dog is a devil.’”  Sahih Muslim Hadith 1032

[Note: March 31, 2020— This is another example of the type of an organization that the United Nations actually is.  Many people are under the impression that it is some sort of a “benevolent organization” with “high minded ideals,” however it is actually the instrument of an unelected dictatorial world government that is run by privately owned central banks.  Its innocuous facade is carefully cultivated to make it seem humane and altruistic, but its agendas actually forward harmful ulterior motives.]

The following information has been taken from the New American article by Alex Newman entitled “UN Killed Thousands of Haitians With Cholera, Claims Immunity”: 

A leaked UN report shows the UN’s guilt in dumping raw sewage into a Haitian river in 2010 that caused a widespread epidemic of cholera which killed potentially tens of thousands of people while former President Bill Clinton was the UN “Special Envoy for Haiti” overseeing UN relief efforts following the catastrophic earthquake that struck that region.

Officially, almost 10,000 Haitians died amid the epidemic, but studies show that potentially as many as 30,000 have succumbed to the disease spread by the UN.  At least 800,000 became infected with the disease that struck after almost 500 UN troops from Nepal sent to occupy Haiti were allowing their raw sewage to flow into the rivers that Haitians used for drinking water, bathing, and washing.  Studies show that the disaster could have been averted for as little as $2,000.

The UN always claims immunity in court for its crimes in Haiti, which include the negligence of dumping toxic sewage into public drinking water, deliberately slaughtering unarmed civilians on other occasions, and widespread sexual exploitation and abuse of children across Haiti by the UN forces occupying it.   The UN is largely dominated by unfree governments and dictatorships.

Thousands of Haitian victims of the UN’s cholera-spreading actions have banded together to sue the UN in U.S. court, but the UN has refused to even appear in court citing diplomatic immunity, and on August 18 a U.S. court agreed with the UN and the Obama administration that the UN is above the law, and it dismissed the lawsuit.

A confidential report sent to the UN by a law professor Philip Alston in August 8 of this year was leaked to the press, stating that among other things, the cholera epidemic that struck Haiti starting in 2010 “would not have broken out but for the actions of the United Nations.”

In the report Alston also said, “[It is] morally unconscionable, legally indefensible and politically self-defeating. It is also entirely unnecessary.  … [It] upholds a double standard according to which the U.N. insists that member states respect human rights, while rejecting any such responsibility for itself. … [The policy also] provides highly combustible fuel for those who claim that U.N. peacekeeping operations trample on the rights of those being protected.”

The UN boss Ban Ki Moon’s deputy spokesman Farhan Haq responded the New York Times about the matter saying “Over the past year, the U.N. has become convinced that it needs to do much more regarding its own involvement in the initial outbreak and the suffering of those affected by cholera. … [To that end,] a new response will be presented publicly within the next two months, once it has been fully elaborated, agreed with the Haitian authorities and discussed with member states.”  He also claimed that Ban’s office “wanted to take this opportunity to welcome this vital report.”

Other reports about the UN Cholera issue in Haiti have been coming out as well.  A report by the UN’s investigations department known as the “Office of Internal Oversight Services” explains that for years UN forces across Haiti dumped sewage in to public Haitian canals and even ignored warnings from laboratories about the fecal contamination and also failed to maintain water-treatment plants at the UN camps.  The report supplies “smoking-gun” evidence of the UN’s guilt, which is no surprise as the UN has a fanatical obsession with reducing the human population, in particularly the number of Africans.

Other UN reports document similar criminal negligence by UN missions around the world.  It appears that wherever the UN troops go, by dumping their waste using unsanitary methods they create massive public health hazards for the people they are supposedly sent to protect, and they then lie about doing so and hide behind “diplomatic immunity” to avoid accountability for the massive death and suffering that they cause.

A longtime Haitan journalist Jonathan Katz reported, “Once you start lying about something at the beginning, once you start covering up what you’ve done, literally, I mean I watched the soldiers at that base dig up their pipes and literally cover up evidence, once you start doing that, it’s very hard to stop.  Because then not only do you have to admit what you did in the first place, you then have to admit also, you’ve been lying about it for all these years. There need to be mechanisms, there need to be systems to hold powerful people, powerful countries, powerful entities, responsible for the things they do in places where people are very, very vulnerable.”

The UN forces have also earned a reputation as being savage predators who exploit and terrorize the local population, as UN troops are now infamous in Haiti for raping and sexually abusing woman and even children, and doing so with impunity.  In one case, UN troops kidnapped a mentally handicapped young boy and brutally raped him for five years, and in another case a Haitian boy was raped by UN troops in an incident that sparked a global outcry.  Similar horrors occur all over the world, from trafficking child-sex slaves out of Yugoslavia to raping young children across Africa and Asia.  In one Ivory Coast town, a survey revealed that eight out of 10 under girls reported being regularly sexually abused and raped by UN forces.

UN forces have also been known to slaughter Haitians with impunity, such as in 2006 when UN forces entered the Haitian community of Cité Soleil and began massacring random people, including children and pregnant woman, as a form of collective punishment for a protest the UN was unhappy about.  Similar massacres have happened before and after, sometimes involving the murder of dozens of civilians or more.

The UN’s approach to all of these atrocities is to cover it up as best as they can and claim diplomatic  immunity, while whistleblowers are ruthlessly persecuted by top officials.

From the New American article:  “It is time for U.S. taxpayers to stop funding the UN’s deadly and grotesque crime spree. The best way to do that would be to pursue an American exit from the dictators club — also known in Congress and beyond as an ‘Amexit.’  Legislation already in Congress, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (HR 1205),  would end U.S. membership in the UN and evict its spy-infested headquarters from American soil. All that is needed for the bill to become law is sufficient public pressure on Congress. In the meantime, lawmakers should cut off all funds for the corrupt and deadly UN as soon as possible.”

Watch a news segment talking about an 18 year old Yazidi girl in Iraq who was captured and sold into sex slavery by ISIS, being held for three months with five other Yazidi women by the men who bought them.

Yazidis are predominantly ethnic Kurds whose religion is based on ancient Persian Zoroastrianism, but to the Islamic State they are at best Pagans and at worst devil worshippers, which makes the Islamists think they are justified in killing their men, raping their women, and abducting their children.

Jinan says, “The men are not human.  They think only of death and killing.  They take drugs non-stop.  They want to binge themselves on the whole world.”

Yazidi children are taken to military academies where they are indoctrinated with ISIS ideologies.  The boys are taught to be soldiers, and the girls are taught to be Jihadi brides.

Jinan was lucky to escape, but more than 2,000 Yazidi woman were still being held by ISIS when the video was made, and thousands of other Yazidis have been displaced in the Kurdistan region.

Jacqueline Isaac’s Testimony to Congress, Part 2 (above).

(Also see parts 1 through 6 of Jacqueline Isaac’s testimony to Congress at this link.)

Following is a summary of this CNS news article: 

A lawyer and humanitarian Jacqueline Isaac gave testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in May 2015 saying that the Islamic State wants to torture and destroy the Yazidi people to “wipe them off the face of the Earth.”   She also explained that they are trying to force the girls to convert to Islam and they are raping them.  Her testimony was not covered by the major news networks ABC, CBS, or NBC.

Issac is vice president of the humanitarian group Roads of Success, and she traveled to Iraq and Syria to meet with many of the victims of the Islamic State, particularly Yazidi girls and women who had been sold into sex slavery by the Islamists and later managed to escape.

Isaac recounts meeting a group of girls who were told by their captors that they would become Muslims once they were raped whether they wanted to convert or not, and then the men actually did rape them.

Isaac said, “Today, it starts with the Yazidis.  Tomorrow, it’s going to be not only the Christians but every woman that doesn’t fit into their philosophy.  We need to stop the menace that’s going on there.  We need to stop it at its route.  This is the nerve center.  Right now, all the crazies from all over the world are coming to this center point, to this nerve center.  If we can cut the snake at its head, we can defuse them. … Their sex trafficking is systematic and it will continue.”

A New American article by Alex Newman criticizes a recent speech that Barack Obama gave in South Africa celebrating the 100th anniversary of Nelson Mandela’s birth, where Obama pushed for the globalist Establishment’s totalitarian control over the world.

In his speech, Obama attacked nationalism, free market capitalism, and leaders such as Donald Trump, saying that he prefers the vision of Nelson Mandela and South Africa, despite the fact that Mandela was a Communist terrorist who was convicted of 193 counts of terrorism that killed thousands of innocent people, and despite the fact that South Africa is currently mired in extreme poverty and agendas of leftist terror being perpetrated by Mandela’s political party.

Obama claimed that the world should follow South Africa’s example, despite Nelson Mandela’s political party the “African National Congress” currently being responsible for the following:

— Genocide occurring against South African minority communities.

—  Poverty Levels exploding in South Africa.

—  Racist land-expropriation programs being implemented.

—  Threats of civil war and societal collapse looming in South Africa.

From the article:

“.. Ironically, one of the key themes of Obama’s speech was inequality.  What he did not say was that, since Apartheid ended and Soviet-backed Communists took over, inequality and poverty have exploded far beyond the levels that existed under the previous regime, making South Africa one of the most unequal societies on Earth.  Average life expectancy has plummeted more than 10 years under the new regime, according to UN data.”

…

“Obama was also clear about what he opposed.  For instance, he blasted ‘populist movements’ as a backlash against the inevitable forces of progress and globalization, and suggested that those involved in fighting back against big government, globalism, and open borders were merely pawns being ‘cynically funded by right-wing billionaires intent on reducing government constraints on their business interests.’  He also lambasted people who hope to secure their borders and maintain their nations, liberties, and self-government, suggesting that everyone who opposes his agenda was a vile racist living in the past.  …”

Newman also mentions an article that examines Mandela’s “heros” that include the mass-murdering Communist dictator Fidel Castro and his chief executioner “Che” Guevara.  “… Mandela claimed that Che Guevara, who executed thousands of alleged ‘counter-revolutionaries’ after sham trials or no trial at all, was an ‘inspiration for every human being who loves freedom.’”

The following is a summary of this Breitbart article: 

A resolution passed by the student government at the University of California, Irvine, seeks giving admissions preference, housing, and funding to college-aged “Syrian” refugees.  The resolution passed unanimously in the student senate on October 18, and must be approved by a committee before being passed to the University administration for approval.  The decision was made behind closed doors.

The bill cites other Universities who are already doing the same, such  as Illinois Institute of Technology, Bryn Mawr College, Michigan State University, and the University of Southern California.

UCI College Republicans President Ariana Rowlands expressed her concern about the process by which this decision was made.  “… I have a problem with a closed student government politically and artificially endorsing policy measures that limits the ability of every prospective UC Irvine student to attain one of a finite amount of seats at this university by favoring non-American over American students. This top-down decision made by the student senators behind closed doors has yet to be announced publicly and does not represent the student body of UC Irvine but rather, represents the social justice objectives of the elite.  … Taking seats away from deserving American citizens and giving them to refugees is just political pandering at the expense of citizens already here, further requiring them to look to government for a handout, in turn furthering government’s power,” She said.

An October 20 statement posted to the UC College Republicans Facebook page said, “We cannot allow political correctness to overshadow reality,” the statement read. “While it would be ideal that our system allows us to help all those in want, such is not possible if a fair, merit-based, financially stable system is to be upheld.”