Many people know someone or people who are gay that are nice people, where such people are also appropriately subtle for example. Therefore a lot of people have been in favor of implementing legislation that imposes homosexual agendas due to having such people in mind, however not all gay people are subtle and many lesser known issues exist with the agendas as well.
While many argue that it is not necessarily harmful for same-sex couples to be married, in many cases it actually is harmful even by the standards of many who advocate for it, and I believe the agenda is harmful for society anyway due to it eroding traditional family structures along with other reasons.
I think many agendas that are being forced by the political Establishment need to be undone, including the gay marriage and gay adoption laws which have an unacceptable amount of potential for abuse, along with also being a gateway to other problems.
Federal legislation had been passed in the U.S. since 2015 that forces gay marriage onto the entire country, and I think it needs to be rescinded— perhaps in a manner that is similar to how decisions about the abortion issue have been given to the States for example, or even better through federal legislation that would actually reverse that situation in the entire country.
I think one of the most significant causes of such problems has been Christian church denominations that are infiltrated by Establishment organizations such as Freemasonry, where many churches now actually advocate for and celebrate homosexual agendas including flying “LGBTQ+” flags and pushing to implement legislation that forces such agendas onto the rest of society— despite the fact that a large number of writings in the Bible are very specific about being opposed to homosexuality.
“LGBTQ+” Issues with Protestant churches
Many Protestant denominations are not simply advocating to “forgive” and not persecute or harm homosexuals, but rather they have been working to help force the full range of harmful gay-related agendas onto society. The churches that are most adamant about advocating to push the agendas include The United Church of Christ, Methodists (but not all of them), Episcopalians, and Presbyterians.
Evangelicals have generally been opposed to agendas such as gay marriage, however there have been attempts to convince them as well, such as this 2014 Washington Post article where an Evangelical minister is attempting to compare being opposed to “LGBT” agendas with staying silent during the Holocaust and civil rights movement.
“LGBTQ+” Issues with Catholicism
The Catholic Church had always been officially opposed to homosexuality and related issues, but Pope Francis has recently decreed that same-sex unions can be “blessed” by the Church and transsexuals can be baptized. However diocese in certain areas such as Chicago have already been involved in “LGBTQ+” agendas such as homosexuality and transgenderism for decades.
See this article for details about those issues.
Many Christian church denominations have been infiltrated by Establishment organizations such as Freemasonry
This video that was produced by the organization Vatican Catholic
explains evidence that shows the evangelists Billy Graham and Pat Robertson are likely Freemasons, and it explains how the Catholic Church has been infiltrated by Freemasonry.
[Note however that both Billy Graham and Pat Robertson never promoted homosexual agendas, and in fact they preached against it. But their likely involvement with Freemasonry demonstrates how other Protestant leaders can be associated with the global elite as well.]
Additional information about potential Masonic involvement of Billy Graham
[Note: As I mentioned in the previous section, Billy Graham never promoted homosexual agendas and in fact he preached against it, but his likely involvement with Freemasonry is an example of how many other Protestant leaders can be associated with the global elite as well.]
Billy Graham was known as “America’s pastor” and the “Protestant Pope.” He always publicly denied being a Freemason, however evidence exists that shows he was likely a high ranking member anyway. Many allegations of his involvement exist online, however most of them aren’t adequately sourced.
Billy Graham’s first crusades in the late 1940’s were heavily promoted by the Establishment-associated media empire of William Randolph Hearst, which published glowing reviews of his events. (link)
Graham was often criticized for supporting Establishment-type agendas, such as the ecumenical mission of the World Council of Churches and the National Council of Churches whose mission was to combine all churches into one. (link)
Graham was publicly associated with every president from Truman to Trump, and I doubt he would have been given such access if he wasn’t a member of the Masonic elite himself.
An illustration of Masonic handshakes
Billy Graham with President Truman.
Billy Graham with Jan Crouch and Paul Crouch.
Billy Graham apparently making a Masonic “Lion’s Paw” sign.
Polls about attitudes of Christians and other religions about “LGBTQ+” issues
Prior to legislation that was passed during the Obama administration in 2015 that forced the legality of gay marriage at a national level (after Obama campaigned saying that he wouldn’t do that), highly publicized polls were created such as this Pew poll that purported to show a large amount of support for gay marriage among Christians.
A 2014 Pew poll even claimed that 42 percent of American Muslims support same-sex marriage; however I think a claim of such large support among Muslims (even Westernized ones) is implausible due to the well-known anti-homosexual attitudes of the ideology (link, and link), which calls into question the legitimacy of the poll and the polling organization.
This September 2023 Newsweek article claims that a whopping 79% of Protestant Christian leaders support gay marriage, according to a 2015 PRRI poll. The article explains that the leaders of the churches are more in favor of those agendas than the congregants, and it ridiculously claims that it is because “[the] clergy are potentially more likely to trust biblical scholars on the interpretation of scripture and how it relates to the modern-day world than the everyday churchgoer,” and it says it is because “[the clergy] are far more likely to be college-educated than their congregations.”
Polls cannot be trusted, however. Obviously easy opportunities exist for polling organizations to skew their data at every stage of the process, so presumably they can essentially create whatever results that they want— which in the case of high profile organizations such as the Pew Research Center and the PRRI, their results could be whatever the political Establishment wants them to be. (But don’t worry, Pew says that polls can be trusted as long as they are “well-designed.”)
Remember that even THE ELECTRONIC VOTE COUNTING MACHINES that are used everywhere are easily hackable, with that fact even being reported by the mainstream media, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that there is almost no attention being given to the question of if polls are actually legitimate or not.
Editor’s note: My opinion about “LGBTQ+” issues
I’ve always been entirely a heterosexual and I don’t understand homosexuality or what causes people to be that way. I would think the cause is genetics, however I’ve heard it claimed that there is no known evidence for that. So if genetics is not the cause then I think it must be due to some sort of environmental factors such as exposure to conditions while developing in the womb or when young, and I think it could be due to conditions of nurturing which could also include being abused, or perhaps it could be due to a combination of such factors.
I also believe that many people just “do it anyway” even though the preference is not really ingrained into them, especially in today’s society where people are encouraged to have bisexual mentalities due to “woke” ideologies. I think that situation will continue to increase over time and it will have harmful consequences for society unless the promotion of it is curtailed.
I doubt it could really be possible for someone to change their sexual orientation unless they really wanted to do so, and I think it could even be a bad idea to try if someone’s sexual orientation is deeply ingrained into their nature. For example I think it would be very unfair for a woman to be stuck with a male partner who is also attracted to males, or for her to be stuck with a male partner who is actually even only attracted to other males but is “trying” to like women. I’ve heard that a lot of males who are abusive to females are actually frustrated homosexuals. Likewise I think it would be a miserable situation for a woman to try to be with a male partner if in fact she finds doing so to be very unpleasant or even repulsive.
In any event I think the situations should generally be reverted to how they were in the 90’s or early 2000’s, where of course legal protections must exist to ensure that homosexuals are safe from being harmed, but also where unspoken norms are common which more or less ensure that an appropriate amount of discretion exists.
.png){kind=link}
