A Palestinian television show “Tomorrow’s Pioneers” advocated for children to become suicide bombers [updated December 19, 2023]

A Palestinian children’s television show “Tomorrow’s Pioneers” which had 21 episodes that were created from 2007 to 2009 focused on creating violent incitement against Jews and Westerners, including advocating for the children in its audience to be suicide bombers.  The show featured adults dressed in costumes who interacted with children on the set in a format similar to the shows “Sesame Street” and “Barney,” and it allowed children to call in from home.

[Note: December 19, 2023— The Wikipedia page for the show says it was created between 2007 to 2009, however this video clip that was recorded in 2022 is in a modern video format— if it is not actually the “Tomorrow’s Pioneers” show then it is a new show that is exactly like it.  The original episodes of the show have apparently continued to air on Palestinian television in reruns since their creation, and the show apparently also has an international audience in places such as Europe.]

In this episode of the show, the children of a female suicide bomber Reem Riyashi who (actually) killed herself and others in a terrorist bombing attack are featured, where they show a video reenactment of her actions for the children in the television audience to watch.  The child host of the show is then shown saying, “These are the children of the Shahid [Martyr] the heroic Jihad fighter who sacrificed all that she had for her homeland.  She cared less about her own flesh and blood and for their sake, she sacrificed [herself] for Allah.  We say to the occupier, that we will continue in the footsteps of the Shahida [Martyr], the Jihad fighter Reem Riyashi, until we liberate our homeland from your hands, usurper.”’

 

This this episode, a girl calls into the broadcast saying she is from Holland, where she and the children on the set sing a song entitled “When We Become Martyrs,” which has the lyrics: “When we get martyred we will go to Paradise.  No, don’t say we are too small.  This life has made us grown-ups.  Without Palestine our childhood means nothing.  Even if they gave us all the money in the world, it won’t make us forget.  I am willing to sacrifice my blood for my country.”

 

This video clip, a nine year old girl calls into the show to recite a passage from a Hadith that advocates to kill Jews.  [Note the person who posted this video clip edited out the portions of the Hadith that specifically advocated to kill Jews.]

 

This video clip shows sections from two episodes of the show, where in the first episode it shows a recurring Mickey Mouse-lookalike main character named “Farfour” who is being given the “keys” to his ancestral land by his “grandfather” who was on his deathbed, and then another episode is shown where Farfour was killed by an Israeli because he refused to sell his land to him.

[Note:  In the episodes after this one, Farfour was never revived but he was replaced by a bumblebee character named “Nahol,” however Farfour was sometimes still mentioned along with the fact that he was killed by a Jew.  When Nahol was introduced, he said, “I want to continue in the path of Farfour – the path of Islam, of heroism, of martyrdom, of the mujahideen,” and the character constantly expressed terrorist views.  Nahol then died in the show because he was sick and in need of an operation but he was blocked from reaching a hospital in Egypt by the Israelis.

Nahol was then replaced in the show with a Bugs Bunny-type character named Assoud who said he will “will finish off the Jews and eat them.”  On his deathbed after being injured in an Israeli attack he instructed the children in the audience that they must fight and die to liberate iberate Haifa, Tel Aviv and other Israeli cities.

The final co-host of the show was a brown bear named Nassur who claims to have come to the Gaza Strip to become one of the mujahideen and to defend the children of Palestine, although he gives evidence that he may have come from Iran.]

A Democrat Senate staffer was caught filming a gay video in the Senate Hearing Room in Washington D.C.

(Note the image of the Senate Hearing Room is from Wikipedia.)

A member of the “LGBTQ+ community” who is a staffer of the Maryland Democrat Senator Ben Cardin has been exposed in the media for recording a perverted video of himself having anal sex on a table in the Senate hearing room, which is where lawmakers sit to ask questions during important proceedings such as Supreme Court nominations, as reported in this Brietbart article.  [Note: I do NOT recommend looking at the video that is embedded on that article even though it it blurred.]

The Maryland Democrat Senator Ben Cardin

The staffer who was later identified as Aidan Maese-Czeropski was fired by Sen. Cardin after news of the video broke, and he has since released a ridiculous statement on his LinkedIn page which blames the fallout about the matter on Homophobia, as reported in this article.  In the statement he said, “This has been a difficult time for me, as I have been attacked for who I love to pursue a political agenda.  While some of my actions in the past have shown poor judgement, I love my job and would never disrespect my workplace.  Any attempts to characterize my actions otherwise are fabricated and I will be exploring what legal options are available to me in these matters.”

[Note: I realize that most homosexuals do not behave like him, but some do.   This is an example of yet another reason why I can’t allow “voting” in my organizations, because people would try to come to support this and all other sorts of leftist agendas either maliciously or otherwise.  Such problems as him are only going to get much worse over time unless the pro-homosexual agendas are reigned in.  Homosexuality belongs in the closet where it always has been, instead of being forced onto everyone such as in schools and being allowed in the military for example.  Also I’m going to advocate to repeal gay marriage legislation due to it being a gateway to all of the other gay-related problems along with other issues.]

Many gays support Islam despite its homicidal attitudes toward them

This Sky News video explains that many homosexual groups have been coming out in support of Hamas and Palestine.

Since the start of the Middle East conflict on October 7th, I’ve been seeing many reports of “LGBTQ+” individuals and groups attempting to embrace Islam as a response, which they have also been doing for many past years.

However, Islam is 100% opposed to adult homosexuality, and in fact in many parts of the Islamic world Homosexuals are executed as an official policy.  I do not think it could be possible that most homosexuals in the West would not be aware of that, yet a large number of them seem to support Islam anyway for some reason.

While some leftists are just naive, I believe that many such as Antifa members and other types of Establishment aligned people actually have malicious intent with their support of the ideology.

 

In this video, Glen Beck speaks with Ami Horowitz who explains the homicidal anti-gay mentality of many if not most mainstream Palestinians, and how American leftists usually support such people.  [Note: I don’t agree with the use of the term “progressives” to refer to leftists, which I think is way too positive of a term and many of them actually use it to refer to themselves.  Have you ever had a conversation with anyone who was criticizing harm that is being caused by leftists or liberals, etc, who uses the term “progressives”?]

They are discussing this video that Horowitz created in 2022, where he asks people on the street in San Francisco if they support Palestine or Israel, where most answered that they support the Palestinians.  In the video Horowitz is then shown visiting Palestine where he explains that gay men and women are frequently tortured and killed; he interviews many people on the street where almost everyone expresses the most extreme views against homosexuals; and he interviews people who have been personally affected by anti-gay violence in Palestine.  Horowitz then shows the footage he recorded in Palestine to the people he spoke to in San Francisco, who said it changed their views.

 

This video shows examples of many leftist Western TikTok “influencers” recently praising Islam.

Many leftist alternative media articles also advocate for homosexuals to support Palestine, such as this one, this one, this one, and this one.

 

There is an enormous amount of examples of Muslim leaders and preachers stating that homosexuals must be killed.

 

In some parts of the Islamic world, homosexuals are executed by being thrown off of high buildings, with their corpses then being stoned by mobs of people where they land.

 

Homosexuals are hanged in Iran.  [Also note that Iran is covertly controlled by ultimately the same people who control the Biden Administration (link, and link).]

Also see this article about the issue of homosexuals being killed by Islam.

Ridiculously though, only homosexuality between ADULTS is prohibited in Islam.  Adult Muslim men having sex with young boys is accepted and it is widely practiced in some parts of the Muslim world.  A PBS Frontline documentary entitled “The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan” details that situation.

What does the word “Jihad” actually mean?

This image from Wikipedia was posted in 2012, with its caption being: “Gazan children display military tactics at a kindergarten graduation ceremony in Gaza City.  After winning Palestinian legislative elections against Fatah in 2006, Hamas launched a successful coup in June 2007 to purge Gaza of remaining Fatah presence.  Hamas security forces shot and tortured Palestinians who opposed Hamas rule in Gaza, and in one instance, threw a Fatah operative from the 15th floor of a Gaza building.”

Despite the fact that the Islamic term “Jihad” technically only means “to strive, endeavor, labor, take pains, and exhaust on behalf or for the sake of something,” in reality the term is almost always only used in connection with aggression towards non-Muslims, despite the Western media constantly attempting to claim otherwise.

An article on the website “Center for the Study of Political Islam” explains that in Islam there is a “greater jihad” which refers to “an inner spiritual struggle,” and a “lesser jihad” which refers to the “killing of others.”  The article explains that 98% of the writings in the Hadith that refer to jihad do so by calling the “killing jihad” as the best action.  [Note that some people claim that only the writings in the Quran should be considered to be legitimate instead of other writings such as the Hadith, however people who espouse that view (“Quranists”) are viewed as “heretics” by both Sunni and Shia Muslims who make up the vast majority of Muslims worldwide.]

A different article entitled “The Many Faces of Jihad” by Raymond Ibrahim explains that while the word “jihad” does technically only mean to “strive” for something with no connotation of violence, in reality the term has most significantly been used in connection with Islam’s history of aggression against non-Muslims, such as to “fight, battle, [and engage in] holy war against the infidels, as a religious duty.”  Ibrahim explains that in modern times, Islam also often engages in other types of aggression against others such as the “jihad al-mal” which means “money jihad” where alms are contributed to hostile Islamic groups; “jihad al-wilada” meaning “demographic jihad” where Muslims strive to create as many offspring as possible as a strategy to outnumber non-Muslims; and “jihad al-kalam,” “jihad al-lissan,” and “jihad al-qalam”— meaning jihad of words, tongues, and pens, respectively, meaning “propaganda.”

About the “propaganda jihad” aspect, Ibrahim says:

“Whether in speaking or writing, here the Muslim’s chief purpose is to empower Islam and/or demoralize the West.  This jihad usually appears as apologetics for Islam and polemics against the West—many of which consist of out-and-out lies; it emanates from Muslim academics, activists, journalists, politicians, and others.

For example, when writer Qasim Rashid used his “pen” to deceive the Washington Post’s infidel readership about the word jihad—saying it only pertains to defensive, never offensive, war—he himself was performing jihad.

Today, many Muslims remain committed to the jihad against and subjugation of the West.  But whereas they can not—they also need not—resort to conventional war.  Words, words, and more words—twisted and false and yet still manipulating the West—are sufficient.

An enormous amount of disinformation articles exist which attempt to claim that Jihad is only a benign term, such as this one by the corrupt “Snopes” organization which makes claims that are easily provable as being fraudulent, such as the following:

“… jihad can be understood in at least two ways: the “greater jihad,” involving the struggle against the lower self (to purify one’s heart, do good, avoid evil, and make oneself a better person,) and the “lesser jihad,” involving the struggle against outside forces, or “any obstacle that stands in the way of the good.”  This can involve fighting against oppressors and aggressors who commit injustice; however, Islamic tradition requires specific ethical conditions in place, such as the requirement ‘to protect non-combatants.’”

… Note for example the references to “fighting against oppressors and aggressors who ‘commit injustice’,” with “specific ethical conditions in place.”  None of those claims have any truth, as the links at the end of this article demonstrate.  The amount of harm that is caused by disinformation articles such as that one are incalculable, as they have been directly leading to naive Westerners throwing open the floodgates of Islam into their countries for years.

For some most relevant and accurate examples of what “jihad” most significantly means, see this link, this link, and this link.  Also see the article “A Summary of Islam Issues.”

The amount of causalities in Gaza are likely less than reported

(Video of drone footage of the aftermath of Israeli attacks in Gaza.)

This article explains that while many people have been killed in Israeli attacks in Gaza since October 7, Hamas’ claims of the number of casualties can’t be trusted for many reasons, including the fact there there is no evidence of mass graves that their claimed 16,000 deaths would have required, the fact that Hamas is claiming that about 30,000 have been wounded when the total number of hospital beds in all medical facilities in Gaza is only about 3,000, and the fact that the Israeli forces usually attempt to warn residents before they attack an area.

[Note: In any event ultimately all sides of the conflict are being controlled by the same group of global elite individuals (link, and link), so of course any loss of lives on all sides are senseless and homicidal.]

Following are key points from a December 6, 2023 article entitled “Hamas’ Gaza Casualties Can’t Be Trusted; Biden Was Right the First Time.”

— News outlets have been reporting nearly 16,000 deaths in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip since the October 7th attacks, however those numbers come from the Hamas-run “Health Ministry” which has a history of making deceptive statements.  Hamas’ founding charter calls for the destruction of Israel and the genocide of Jews, and in 1995 the United States had designated the Iran-backed group as a terrorist organization.

— Claims by the group that their causalities are “mostly women and children” are used to destroy support for Israel on the world stage and let Hamas survive by stopping or reducing Israel’s campaign of “indiscriminate” attacks, as is being advocated by congressional Democrats in the U.S. and the anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish left.

— Even if the casualty numbers being supplied by Hamas are correct (which they can’t be as is explained later), it would be a proportion of 2.63 civilian casualties to every 1 combatant causality, whereas in 2015 the UN put combatant to non-combatant deaths caused by the US and British forces in Afghanistan and Iraq at between 3:1 and 4:1.  [Note: I think in all those cases the ratios are horrible as well, of course.]

— During the 50-day Israel-Hamas 2014 war in the Gaza strip, Israel had gone out of its way minimize the non-combatant deaths, including warning the civilians of the impending attacks in their neighborhoods.

— During the current conflict, the Israeli forces have been dropping leaflets, making phone calls by Arabic-speaking IDF soldiers, and otherwise warning citizens to flee from Hamas targets.  Additionally Israel has even fired on Hamas soldiers to protect Palestinian civilians, as is explained in this article.

— After the 2014 war, Hamas has stopped specifying fatalities by age and sex, thus making them “fanciful propaganda statistics” as Lenny Ben-David of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs said in an article “The Casualty Figures in Gaza Are a Scam.”  [Note: In the article he also says, “… Hamas facilities and leaders hide behind civilians and under schools and hospitals.  Hamas fighters block civilians from evacuating.  And then, Hamas’ Ministry of Health inflates the casualty figures. … Israel repeatedly warned Gazan residents of north Gaza to evacuate their homes.  Leaflets were dropped in their neighborhoods, and even private phone calls were made by IDF Arabic-speaking soldiers.  An estimated one million Gazans took the warnings seriously and avoided Hamas attempts to keep them in the north as human shields.  Lower casualty rates of women and children should have reflected their leaving the north.”]

— In another analysis by the Jerusalem Center entitled “Hamas’ Numbers Warfare,” it is explained that neither the Hamas leadership or the Ministry of Health reported a single causality among the Hamas forces in the first five weeks of fighting, and it points out that no one questioned their claims of about 30,000 wounded when the total number of hospital beds in all medical facilities in Gaza did not exceed 3,000.  The author Prof. Kobi Michael explains that he estimates the number of dead and wounded Gazans to be 50 percent of the total amount that is reported by Hamas officials, with at least half of those being Hamas members.

— A former US intelligence analyst Malcom Nance wrote a Tweet where he explained that there was no way that doctors would have been able to pass on information about the verified dead due to them not having a working integrated medical reporting system prior to the cease-fire; he also said there would have been no way for Hamas to know how many people have died outside the hospitals; and he said that it is in fact possible to make estimates of numbers of deaths from mass graves as he had done at Mariupol, Ukranian ISIS sites, however there is no evidence of 160 mass graves existing (assuming 100 bodies in each) that would have been needed to bury so many people.  He ends his Tweet by saying “Sorry it is just Impossible to verify ANY HAMAS health ministry death tolls.  The media, NGOs & UN uses HAMAS figures.”

— After their October 7th attacks, Hamas pledged to attempt more genocidal raids into Israel until the Jewish state and its Jews are destroyed.  Israel believes the organization started the war with 30,000 gunmen, and Hamas terrorists fight among Gaza’s civilians, which means that eradicating them will continue to result in noncombatant deaths.

“All Quiet on the Western Front” is a great movie

I recently saw the movie “All Quiet on the Western Front” which depicts the horrifying reality of trench warfare in Word War I, from the German perspective.  Strangely the movie was not shown in theaters which would have generated more attention and revenue for it, but rather it was produced by Netflix.  The movie is also shown on Amazon Streaming.

This movie along with the movie “Thou Shall Not Grow Old” depict the strange amount of enthusiasm the public in Europe had about going to war, where they accepted whatever they were told by the global elite without question.

I think the situation in Europe is still the same, where the populations still unquestioningly accept whatever they are told by the same global elite, however now the elite are using the past conflicts that they created as an excuse for what they are now telling them to do— where they are claiming that “patriotism” and “nationalism” were the cause of the wars, and in many counties such as Germany it is illegal to even question what happened during World War II.

There is a direct parallel between the attitudes of the naive populations prior to the wars and their current naive unquestioning acceptance of the intentionally harmful immigration agendas that are being unleashed upon them now (link, link, and link).  (Most non-Europeans are completely unaware of the horrible problems that are happening on that continent due to the out-of-control Islamic immigration that has been happening there, due to a media blackout about the topic.)  

In all cases their problems can be directly attributed to them not knowing who the global elite actually are and what their goals are (link).  Also most of them do not know how harmful the European Union organization and the United Nations are.

It is also very important to the global elite that Europeans don’t know what the terms “right wing” and “left wing” actually mean, so in their media reports they constantly try to reinforce a false perception that “right wing” means “racism, bigotry, violence, and Nazism,” and “left wing” means “peace, love, and sharing.”  See THIS IMPORTANT ARTICLE that explains the real meanings of those terms.

I’m hearing reports of populists being elected in some countries such as Geert Wilders in Sweden, and Javier Milei in Argentina, however it is important to be skeptical of such people since they’ve been elected in an environment that is still prior to the awakening and where the voting machines are still rigged.

I notice in the above article about Geert Wilders that his “hard-right, anti-Muslim party, Party for Freedom (PVV)” wants to ban headscarves, however I believe that only a controlled opposition organization would want to ban headscarves because implementing such as ban on the clothing that people wear is not a “right wing” mentality, and worse it would only conceal the problem of encroaching Islamism.

If such politicians were genuinely for real, they would outlaw the use of all electronic vote counting, and get their countries out of organizations such as the European Union and the United Nations.

James Perloff speaks about Israel’s Mossad being involved in many past false flag attacks

This is a November 20, 2023 interview of James Perloff, who wrote the book “The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline” and the book “COVID-19 and the Agendas to Come, Red Pilled.”  In the interview he details the Israeli Mossad’s involvement in many of the global elite’s false flag attacks over the past century up until now.

[Note that while Israel has very significant involvement in the Illuminati global elite, it isn’t the “source” of the it but rather it is just a tool of theirs just as the U.S. and the other Western countries (and in fact essentially all countries) are.  The Illuminati depend on antisemitism in order to deflect criticism off of themselves, so they often intentionally cause and organize it.  Nonetheless I think the Israeli government is thoroughly corrupt and a danger to humanity, just as the Biden administration and the European Union are for example.]

A Muslim is suing a Chicago law firm for rescinding her job offer due to her support for Islamic Extremism

A Chicago area news report explains that a Muslim woman is suing the Foley & Lardner law firm for rescinding her job offer after they learned that she has been speaking out in favor of radical pro-Palestine views.  She is shown saying, “They interrogated me in a hostile manner about my involvement with Students for Justice in Palestine and about other aspects of my identity and background.”  The report explains that the law firm saw a video of a public comment she gave at a city council meeting on October 13, where she asked the Alderman to vote against a resolution to condemn Hamas’s attack on Israel.  The report shows her answering when questioned about the matter where she said it was her first amendment right to say it.

Her lawsuit is being brought with the assistance of the group CAIR, which is notorious for implementing the use of lawfare to sue employers who resist being bullied by pro-sharia demands of Muslim employees.  See this article that details a long list of such lawsuits that CAIR has brought in the past.

 

The “Students for Justice in Palestine” group is one of the violent leftist Establishment organizations that are attacking Jewish people on campuses and elsewhere.  Also see this link and this link which each contain a list of articles related to issues with the organization.

 

View a BBC news segment interviewing a woman who was suspended for showing up for her first day of work as a teacher at a Church of England school wearing a full body burka.  Also see this link.

Why did Palestine squander a chance to become free in 2005?

Hamas militants in a parade procession.

Israel left the Gaza Strip in 2005, supposedly with the idea that the area would become self-governing as a means to create peace between the two regions.  But soon after Israel left, Hamas damaged the area’s infrastructure such as greenhouses that were left behind, and then the people in Gaza voted Hamas into power to be its representative government, after which the group took totalitarian control of the region.  Since that time, Hamas has frequently engaged in skirmishes and larger armed conflicts with Israel (link), causing Israel to lock the area down and restrict the movement of people.

Most people agree that at least on the surface Israel was in the right in that situation, but since Hamas is actually controlled by the global elite (link, and link), it changes everything.

I find it disturbing that most people who have been vocally pro-Palestine have been doing so under the assumption that the situation on the surface is the whole truth— In other words, many support Hamas and its terrorist mentalities even though it is actually a weapon that is being used against the Palestinians, the Israelis, and the rest of the world.

 

What are the goals of Hamas?

The goals of Hamas are ultimately “offensive” and not “defensive,” as they are based on Islamic Jihadist scripture.  See this video by David Wood that explains the stages of Jihad.

In 1988, Hamas wrote its first charter where it advocated for the obliteration of Israel through Jihad, the rejection of peaceful settlements with Israel, and it incited to kill Jews by citing scripture from the Quran.

In 2017, the group wrote an “updated” charter which has less antisemitic language, but it still says that Israel has no right to exist.  It is often criticized as being a cosmetic effort designed to make Hamas sound more palatable while actually not changing anything about its underlying aims and methods.

See this article that contains excepts from the 1988 charter and text from a Wikipedia page about the 2017 charter.

 

What are polls saying about the attitudes of Palestinians and others?

Polls have shown that about 76% of Palestinians currently support Hamas, while about 57% of American Muslims think that Hamas was at least somewhat justified in its attacks.  Among American students when broken down by race, 58% of White college students, 47% of Latinos, and only 36% of Black college students believe that Hamas deserves blame for the attacks.

Note however that polls should not be trusted since there is no accountability for their results.  For example, an Axios poll taken before the 2020 election that was reported by CBS said that 32% of black people thought that whites would attack them at the polls.

Attitudes PRIOR to the October 7th attacks:

A June, 2021 AP article explains that there was a surge in support for Hamas in Palestine in a poll after a Gaza war with Israel occurred in the previous month, where three quarters of the people said they thought the Islamic militants were the victors, and 53% of them said they believe Hamas is “most deserving of representing and leading the Palestinian people.”

A December 8, 2023 Stanford University report says that it polled Palestinians on the day before the October 7th attacks:

“ … [A] majority of Palestinians (51%) supported a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, with slightly more support seen among residents of Gaza than among West Bank Palestinians.  A quarter of respondents also said they supported ‘armed resistance’ as a preferred solution to Palestinian-Israeli conflict.”

A related issue, Jamal added, is that the Palestinian Authority (PA) has lost legitimacy, due to both its levels of corruption and the continued failure of the peace process.  If Palestinians are to ever believe in a future that extends beyond Hamas, she said, then the international community must work together to help bolster the legitimacy of the PA so that it can be the champion of the peace process.

[NOTE that the supposedly “moderate” Palestinian Authority had recently issued an edict to be preached to Muslims on October 19, where it advocated for the extermination of all Jews.  See this article and the video it contains about that matter.]

Attitudes AFTER the October 7th attacks:

A November 14, 2023 Awrad poll of Palestinians says that 76% support Hamas, and when asked about their support of the various Hamas armed wings: 89% support the Al-Qassam Brigades, 84% support the Islamic Jihad group, and 80% support the Aqsa Brigades.

This October 17, 2023 “Generation Lab” poll that was reported by NBC says that 73% of Republicans and only 50% of Democrats and independents blame Hamas for its attack on Israel; and when broken down by race, 58% of White college students, 47% of Latinos, and only 36% of Black college students believe that Hamas deserves blame for the attacks.

An October 20, 2023 Cygnal poll asked Muslim Americans about their views of the Palestine-Israel conflict, where it reported the following results, as reported in this Jihad Watch article:

— 28% Of Muslim Americans strongly agree that Hamas was justified in their attacks, while 29% somewhat agree. (57% agree overall.)

— 16% Of Muslim Americans strongly disagree that Hamas was justified in their attacks, while 25% somewhat disagree. (41% disagree overall.)

— The Hamas Leader Ismail Haniyeh has a 38% favorability among Muslim Americans, and 34% are unfavorable to him.

— The Hamas Leader Ismail Haniyeh has a 7% favorability among American Jews, and 12% favorability among Evangelicals.

— The Iranian supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has a 31% favorability among Muslim Americans and a 34% unfavorable rating.

— 52% of Muslim Americans equate Hamas to Al Qaeda, while 18% say it is not as bad.  49% equate it to ISIS.

— About a third of Muslim Americans rated Israel and even Netanyahu positively, but many more are opposed.

 

Other indicators of attitudes of the Palestinians

There is much evidence of Palestinians having hostile attitudes toward Israel and the West, such as the following information shows.  It can be argued that ultimately such mentalities have been purposely “engineered” into them by the global elite, but those are the mentalities that many have nonetheless.

A video made in the year 2000 explains that Palestinian children are systematically taught in their public schools and elsewhere to hate Jews; where their textbooks advocate for violent Jihad and even suicide bombing, and the state of Israel is not even depicted on their maps.

This article explains that footage exists of thousands of Palestinians celebrating when they learned about the 9/11 attacks, but most of the footage was suppressed by the AP.

This news report shows a Palestinian mob executing two Palestinians for allegedly collaborating with Israel, where they were then hung in the city center for display.

Many U.S. Muslim groups praised the October 7th Hamas terrorists attacks

This article is a collection of outrageous responses by U.S. Muslim organizations to the October 7, 2023 terrorist attacks in Israel.  This information was originally published on October 13 in this article by Susannah Johnston on the website “Focus on Western Islamism.”

The Muslim groups in this article are specifically praising the October 7th terrorist attacks on civilians— as if they were praising the 9/11 attacks, for example.

I have summarized the following information from the original article.  See the actual article for its supporting links.

— Dr. Omar Suleiman, the founder and president of the Yaqeen Institute in Irving, Texas in said in a sermon about the attack, “I want you to know that you have a responsibility.  You might not be in the trench, but maybe you’re one of the people on the outside of the trench that’s trying to push people away, that’s trying to make things easier for those [Palestinians] behind the trench.  Whatever platform you have, whatever voice you have, whatever money you have, whatever dua you have — when you use that for Allah — you are not alone… Palestine will win inshallah”

— The Iranian regime-linked Manassas Mosque in Virginia declared its support for the Hamas terrorist organization in a recent newsletter: “We stand firmly with the Palestinian Resistance (Hamas) and the courageous people of Palestine.  With the help of Allah (swt), they will bring liberation and justice to Palestine and to the rest of the world.  The Israeli regime is weak and afraid of all the calls for the freedom of Palestine taking place all over the globe.  The regime’s days are numbered.”

— Ammar Shahin, the imam of the Islamic Center of Davis, California posted pictures of Hamas’s attack on the day of October 7th, and later urged support for Gaza and claimed “victory is near.”

— Yasir Qadhi, the imam at the East Plano Islamic Center in Texas said on a YouTube video that since he is not employed at a university or other institution, he has “the luxury of bluntly saying I am not going to condemn the fight of an oppressed people.”

— Elizabeth Sohail, the Program Development officer at a Texas charity Baitulmaal, has denounced vigils for Israeli victims of the October 7th massacre as “propaganda.”  Baitulmaal openly funds Hamas proxies in Gaza, and it is run by Mazen Mokhtar, a former fundraiser for the Taliban and other jihadist groups.

— Nihad Awad, the co-founder and Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) tweeted in Arabic on October 7 calling for all Arab people to reject normalizing relations with Israel.  Awad publicly stated in 1994 that he is in support of the Hamas movement.  (The Hamas charter calls for obliterating Israel and says, “There is no solution for the Palestinian problem except by Jihad.”)  He also refers to critics of the Hamas terrorist attacks in the media as “Apartheid propagandists.”

— Ayah Ziyadeh, the advocacy director for a group called AMP refused to condemn Hamas in an interview with CBS News Miami, where she called Hamas’s actions a “response” and not an “attack,” and she said for Hamas to remain a “victim” was “unjust in itself.”  Last year, a federal judge determined that a years’ long lawsuit which alleged that AMP is linked to Hamas could proceed.

— AMP has also been leading a forceful campaign to justify Palestinian “resistance” since the October 7th attacks, such as holding webinars featuring CAIR’s Nihad Awad who denounced President Biden as a “Zionist” who spews “Israeli propaganda.”  Also AMP has been referencing the Muslim American Society’s Ibrahim Zeini who referred to Hamas as “resistance fighters” who are beginning to “shift” the Palestinian cause to “victory.”

— Tarek Khalil, an education coordinator for AMP said about the attacks at a talk at the Bridgeview Mosque Foundation and The Iman Foundation: “Okay, I’m going to give you two sides, and you tell me which side has a better claim to self-defense: Colonizer, occupier, dispossessor, oppressor on one side; Colonized, occupied, dispossessed, oppressed on the other … What they’re defending is an oppressor’s claim of self-defense … [Biden] is justifying the brutal slaughter of an entire people.” (The Bridgeview Mosque Foundation was reportedly investigated by the FBI in 2003 for “terror-related money laundering,” and a couple years later the mosque had their bank accounts closed for funding a group tied to Osama bin Laden.  Also the U.S. government listed Jamal Said, the mosque’s current imam, as an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation, an organization found guilty of funneling millions of dollars to Hamas.)

— Additionally, AMP’s Director of Outreach & Community Organizing Taher Herzallahs has been referring to Zionist Jews and Christian Zionists as “enemy number one.”

— Suhaib Webb, an American-born imam who runs an online school, said about the attacks, “It is fundamentally flawed to accuse people who are seeking their humanity and dignity and respect of being inhumane.” Also, after the 9/11 attacks Webb reportedly attempted to post bond for Hussein Al-Attas, who drove the “20th hijacker” to flight school.

— The Islamic Society of Baltimore posted a video on its YouTube channel which stated, “‘Do not forget us,’ said Palestine.  ‘Dear Palestine, we never will,’ replied the Ummah.”  Additionally, in 2004 the mosque’s then-cleric Mohammed El-Sheikh attempted to justify suicide bombings.

— The founder and director of a “Darul Uloom Online Institute of IslamMufti Yasir Nadeem al Wajidi tweeted, “Freedom fighters vs. occupying terrorists ‘How many times has a small force vanquished a mighty army by the Will of Allah!’ Quran: 2/249.”  He also teaches at the Chicago-area Institute of Islamic Education.

— The Muslim Brotherhood affiliated Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) wrote on Facebook, “By actively, and often violently, preventing their pursuit of a self-defined identity, national autonomy, and global recognition, Israeli occupation and the world’s continued silence has offered Hamas and other groups the political vacuum needed to propel themselves into positions of leadership and justify their violent attacks.”  MPAC has a history of sanitizing jihad and portraying terrorists as noble.

— Houda Atassi, the founder of International Humanitarian Relief (IHR) which is a charity that has a branch in Illinois, posted videos clips on October 8th that appeared to be from the terrorist attacks, saying “We pray for their victory.”