(Note the image of the Senate Hearing Room is from Wikipedia.)
A member of the “LGBTQ+ community” who is a staffer of the Maryland Democrat Senator Ben Cardin has been exposed in the media for recording a perverted video of himself having anal sex on a table in the Senate hearing room, which is where lawmakers sit to ask questions during important proceedings such as Supreme Court nominations, as reported in this Brietbart article. [Note: I do NOT recommend looking at the video that is embedded on that article even though it it blurred.]
The Maryland Democrat Senator Ben Cardin
The staffer who was later identified as Aidan Maese-Czeropski was fired by Sen. Cardin after news of the video broke, and he has since released a ridiculous statement on his LinkedIn page which blames the fallout about the matter on Homophobia, as reported in this article. In the statement he said, “This has been a difficult time for me, as I have been attacked for who I love to pursue a political agenda. While some of my actions in the past have shown poor judgement, I love my job and would never disrespect my workplace. Any attempts to characterize my actions otherwise are fabricated and I will be exploring what legal options are available to me in these matters.”
[Note: I realize that most homosexuals do not behave like him, but some do. This is an example of yet another reason why I can’t allow “voting” in my organizations, because people would try to come to support this and all other sorts of leftist agendas either maliciously or otherwise. Such problems as him are only going to get much worse over time unless the pro-homosexual agendas are reigned in. Homosexuality belongs in the closet where it always has been, instead of being forced onto everyone such as in schools and being allowed in the military for example. Also I’m going to advocate to repeal gay marriage legislation due to it being a gateway to all of the other gay-related problems along with other issues.]
This Sky News video explains that many homosexual groups have been coming out in support of Hamas and Palestine.
Since the start of the Middle East conflict on October 7th, I’ve been seeing many reports of “LGBTQ+” individuals and groups attempting to embrace Islam as a response, which they have also been doing for many past years.
However, Islam is 100% opposed to adult homosexuality, and in fact in many parts of the Islamic world Homosexuals are executed as an official policy. I do not think it could be possible that most homosexuals in the West would not be aware of that, yet a large number of them seem to support Islam anyway for some reason.
While some leftists are just naive, I believe that many such as Antifa members and other types of Establishment aligned people actually have malicious intent with their support of the ideology.
In this video, Glen Beck speaks with Ami Horowitz who explains the homicidal anti-gay mentality of many if not most mainstream Palestinians, and how American leftists usually support such people. [Note: I don’t agree with the use of the term “progressives” to refer to leftists, which I think is way too positive of a term and many of them actually use it to refer to themselves. Have you ever had a conversation with anyone who was criticizing harm that is being caused by leftists or liberals, etc, who uses the term “progressives”?]
They are discussing this video that Horowitz created in 2022, where he asks people on the street in San Francisco if they support Palestine or Israel, where most answered that they support the Palestinians. In the video Horowitz is then shown visiting Palestine where he explains that gay men and women are frequently tortured and killed; he interviews many people on the street where almost everyone expresses the most extreme views against homosexuals; and he interviews people who have been personally affected by anti-gay violence in Palestine. Horowitz then shows the footage he recorded in Palestine to the people he spoke to in San Francisco, who said it changed their views.
This video shows examples of many leftist Western TikTok “influencers” recently praising Islam.
Many leftist alternative media articles also advocate for homosexuals to support Palestine, such as this one, this one, this one, and this one.
There is an enormous amount of examples of Muslim leaders and preachers stating that homosexuals must be killed.
In some parts of the Islamic world, homosexuals are executed by being thrown off of high buildings, with their corpses then being stoned by mobs of people where they land.
Homosexuals are hanged in Iran. [Also note that Iran is covertly controlled by ultimately the same people who control the Biden Administration (link, and link).]
Also see this article about the issue of homosexuals being killed by Islam.
Ridiculously though, only homosexuality between ADULTS is prohibited in Islam. Adult Muslim men having sex with young boys is accepted and it is widely practiced in some parts of the Muslim world. A PBS Frontline documentary entitled “The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan” details that situation.
I recently saw the movie “All Quiet on the Western Front” which depicts the horrifying reality of trench warfare in Word War I, from the German perspective. Strangely the movie was not shown in theaters which would have generated more attention and revenue for it, but rather it was produced by Netflix. The movie is also shown on Amazon Streaming.
This movie along with the movie “Thou Shall Not Grow Old” depict the strange amount of enthusiasm the public in Europe had about going to war, where they accepted whatever they were told by the global elite without question.
I think the situation in Europe is still the same, where the populations still unquestioningly accept whatever they are told by the same global elite, however now the elite are using the past conflicts that they created as an excuse for what they are now telling them to do— where they are claiming that “patriotism” and “nationalism” were the cause of the wars, and in many counties such as Germany it is illegal to even question what happened during World War II.
There is a direct parallel between the attitudes of the naive populations prior to the wars and their current naive unquestioning acceptance of the intentionally harmful immigration agendas that are being unleashed upon them now (link, link, and link). (Most non-Europeans are completely unaware of the horrible problems that are happening on that continent due to the out-of-control Islamic immigration that has been happening there, due to a media blackout about the topic.)
In all cases their problems can be directly attributed to them not knowing who the global elite actually are and what their goals are (link). Also most of them do not know how harmful the European Union organization and the United Nations are.
It is also very important to the global elite that Europeans don’t know what the terms “right wing” and “left wing” actually mean, so in their media reports they constantly try to reinforce a false perception that “right wing” means “racism, bigotry, violence, and Nazism,” and “left wing” means “peace, love, and sharing.” See THIS IMPORTANT ARTICLE that explains the real meanings of those terms.
I’m hearing reports of populists being elected in some countries such as Geert Wilders in Sweden, and Javier Milei in Argentina, however it is important to be skeptical of such people since they’ve been elected in an environment that is still prior to the awakening and where the voting machines are still rigged.
I notice in the above article about Geert Wilders that his “hard-right, anti-Muslim party, Party for Freedom (PVV)” wants to ban headscarves, however I believe that only a controlled opposition organization would want to ban headscarves because implementing such as ban on the clothing that people wear is not a “right wing” mentality, and worse it would only conceal the problem of encroaching Islamism.
If such politicians were genuinely for real, they would outlaw the use of all electronic vote counting, and get their countries out of organizations such as the European Union and the United Nations.
A Chicago area news report explains that a Muslim woman is suing the Foley & Lardner law firm for rescinding her job offer after they learned that she has been speaking out in favor of radical pro-Palestine views. She is shown saying, “They interrogated me in a hostile manner about my involvement with Students for Justice in Palestine and about other aspects of my identity and background.” The report explains that the law firm saw a video of a public comment she gave at a city council meeting on October 13, where she asked the Alderman to vote against a resolution to condemn Hamas’s attack on Israel. The report shows her answering when questioned about the matter where she said it was her first amendment right to say it.
Her lawsuit is being brought with the assistance of the group CAIR, which is notorious for implementing the use of lawfare to sue employers who resist being bullied by pro-sharia demands of Muslim employees. See this article that details a long list of such lawsuits that CAIR has brought in the past.
The “Students for Justice in Palestine” group is one of the violent leftist Establishment organizations that are attacking Jewish people on campuses and elsewhere. Also see this link and this link which each contain a list of articles related to issues with the organization.
View a BBC news segment interviewing a woman who was suspended for showing up for her first day of work as a teacher at a Church of England school wearing a full body burka. Also see this link.
Israel left the Gaza Strip in 2005, supposedly with the idea that the area would become self-governing as a means to create peace between the two regions. But soon after Israel left, Hamas damaged the area’s infrastructure such as greenhouses that were left behind, and then the people in Gaza voted Hamas into power to be its representative government, after which the group took totalitarian control of the region. Since that time, Hamas has frequently engaged in skirmishes and larger armed conflicts with Israel (link), causing Israel to lock the area down and restrict the movement of people.
Most people agree that at least on the surface Israel was in the right in that situation, but since Hamas is actually controlled by the global elite (link, and link), it changes everything.
I find it disturbing that most people who have been vocally pro-Palestine have been doing so under the assumption that the situation on the surface is the whole truth— In other words, many support Hamas and its terrorist mentalities even though it is actually a weapon that is being used against the Palestinians, the Israelis, and the rest of the world.
What are the goals of Hamas?
The goals of Hamas are ultimately “offensive” and not “defensive,” as they are based on Islamic Jihadist scripture. See this video by David Wood that explains the stages of Jihad.
In 1988, Hamas wrote its first charter where it advocated for the obliteration of Israel through Jihad, the rejection of peaceful settlements with Israel, and it incited to kill Jews by citing scripture from the Quran.
In 2017, the group wrote an “updated” charter which has less antisemitic language, but it still says that Israel has no right to exist. It is often criticized as being a cosmetic effort designed to make Hamas sound more palatable while actually not changing anything about its underlying aims and methods.
See this article that contains excepts from the 1988 charter and text from a Wikipedia page about the 2017 charter.
What are polls saying about the attitudes of Palestinians and others?
Polls have shown that about 76% of Palestinians currently support Hamas, while about 57% of American Muslims think that Hamas was at least somewhat justified in its attacks. Among American students when broken down by race, 58% of White college students, 47% of Latinos, and only 36% of Black college students believe that Hamas deserves blame for the attacks.
Note however that polls should not be trusted since there is no accountability for their results. For example, an Axios poll taken before the 2020 election that was reported by CBS said that 32% of black people thought that whites would attack them at the polls.
Attitudes PRIOR to the October 7th attacks:
A June, 2021 AP article explains that there was a surge in support for Hamas in Palestine in a poll after a Gaza war with Israel occurred in the previous month, where three quarters of the people said they thought the Islamic militants were the victors, and 53% of them said they believe Hamas is “most deserving of representing and leading the Palestinian people.”
A December 8, 2023 Stanford University report says that it polled Palestinians on the day before the October 7th attacks:
“ … [A] majority of Palestinians (51%) supported a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, with slightly more support seen among residents of Gaza than among West Bank Palestinians. A quarter of respondents also said they supported ‘armed resistance’ as a preferred solution to Palestinian-Israeli conflict.”
…
A related issue, Jamal added, is that the Palestinian Authority (PA) has lost legitimacy, due to both its levels of corruption and the continued failure of the peace process. If Palestinians are to ever believe in a future that extends beyond Hamas, she said, then the international community must work together to help bolster the legitimacy of the PA so that it can be the champion of the peace process.
[NOTE that the supposedly “moderate” Palestinian Authority had recently issued an edict to be preached to Muslims on October 19, where it advocated for the extermination of all Jews. See this article and the video it contains about that matter.]
Attitudes AFTER the October 7th attacks:
A November 14, 2023 Awrad poll of Palestinians says that 76% support Hamas, and when asked about their support of the various Hamas armed wings: 89% support the Al-Qassam Brigades, 84% support the Islamic Jihad group, and 80% support the Aqsa Brigades.
This October 17, 2023 “Generation Lab” poll that was reported by NBC says that 73% of Republicans and only 50% of Democrats and independents blame Hamas for its attack on Israel; and when broken down by race, 58% of White college students, 47% of Latinos, and only 36% of Black college students believe that Hamas deserves blame for the attacks.
An October 20, 2023 Cygnal poll asked Muslim Americans about their views of the Palestine-Israel conflict, where it reported the following results, as reported in this Jihad Watch article:
— 28% Of Muslim Americans strongly agree that Hamas was justified in their attacks, while 29% somewhat agree. (57% agree overall.)
— 16% Of Muslim Americans strongly disagree that Hamas was justified in their attacks, while 25% somewhat disagree. (41% disagree overall.)
— The Hamas Leader Ismail Haniyeh has a 38% favorability among Muslim Americans, and 34% are unfavorable to him.
— The Hamas Leader Ismail Haniyeh has a 7% favorability among American Jews, and 12% favorability among Evangelicals.
— The Iranian supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has a 31% favorability among Muslim Americans and a 34% unfavorable rating.
— 52% of Muslim Americans equate Hamas to Al Qaeda, while 18% say it is not as bad. 49% equate it to ISIS.
— About a third of Muslim Americans rated Israel and even Netanyahu positively, but many more are opposed.
Other indicators of attitudes of the Palestinians
There is much evidence of Palestinians having hostile attitudes toward Israel and the West, such as the following information shows. It can be argued that ultimately such mentalities have been purposely “engineered” into them by the global elite, but those are the mentalities that many have nonetheless.
A video made in the year 2000 explains that Palestinian children are systematically taught in their public schools and elsewhere to hate Jews; where their textbooks advocate for violent Jihad and even suicide bombing, and the state of Israel is not even depicted on their maps.
This article explains that footage exists of thousands of Palestinians celebrating when they learned about the 9/11 attacks, but most of the footage was suppressed by the AP.
This news report shows a Palestinian mob executing two Palestinians for allegedly collaborating with Israel, where they were then hung in the city center for display.
This video explains that throughout the 20th century Israel has been willing to agree to fair “two state solution” agreements with the Palestinians, however such offers has always been rejected due to the Palestinians wanting to control the entire area.
[Note: I’m not an expert on each of those potential agreements, but I’m confident that the video is accurate at least on the surface about the attempts at agreements that were made.
However very few people understand that the political Establishment has had covert control over most of Islam since the 1800’s, so the reality of those potential agreements may have been derailed somehow due to the leaders on the Islamic sides being controlled opposition such as Yasser Arafat of the PLO.
The book Hostage to Khomeini explains that the global elite (especially British elements of it) have been infiltrating the Middle East going back to 1820 using Freemasonry. The book explains, “In the Middle East, the British have always sought out the corrupt tribal leaders and the venal clergy to lead movements whose objectives have always seemed to coincide with British objectives. With the Muslim Brotherhood, British imperial policy was institutionalized in the form of a disciplined organization dedicated to returning the Middle East to the Dark Ages.”
Iran has even built an obvious Masonic temple for its parliament building, so there is no question about the country being controlled by the political Establishment.
In other words, the exact same people who have been forcing ridiculous “LGBTQ+” agendas such as transgenderism on Americans in public schools and elsewhere have also been executing homosexuals in parts of the Islamic world such as Iran for decades, along with all of the other oppressive Islamic policies including extreme anti-women agendas.]
A screenshot from the article on a pro-Islam website.
An Israeli mother who was reported to be a hostage of Hamas with her daughter for 49 days in Gaza was elated about the apparent interfaith dialog she had with the terrorist group while they were detained, where she wrote a “thank you letter” to them saying, “I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your extraordinary humanity shown towards my daughter, Emilia.”
Danielle and Emilia Aloni were among 24 Israeli hostages that were released by Hamas on November 24. They were captured while visiting Danielle’s sister and her family at a Kibbutz in southern Israel before they were taken hostage.
The armed wing of Hamas called Qassam Brigades shared the letter on its official telegram account on November 27.
The handwritten letter in Hebrew was posted along with an Arabic translation and a photograph of the mother and daughter.
The woman additionally said the following in the letter, which I believe is either some sort of a pro-Hamas publicity stunt or it is indicative of the woman suffering from Stockholm Syndrome:
“She (Emilia) acknowledges feeling like all of you are her friends, not just friends, but truly beloved and good.”
“Thank you for the many hours you spent as caregivers.”
“Children should not be in captivity, but thanks to you and other kind people we met along the way, my daughter felt like a queen in Gaza.”
“In the long journey we have been on, we have not met anyone who has not been kind to her, you have treated her with kindness and compassion.”
“I will remember your kind behaviour shown in spite of the difficult situation you faced and the severe losses you suffered here in Gaza.”
“I wish in this world we could truly be good friends,”
“I wish you all health and well-being… health and love to you and your families’ children.”
On October 7, 2023 Hamas invaded Israel in a massive terrorist attack (link), killing and sometimes raping and beheading many hundreds of Israelis while the group was taking hostages. See this article that details many of the atrocities that were committed.
Contrary to Mrs. Aloni’s admiration for her captors, many more believable reports exist that detail mistreatment at the hands of the terrorists (link, link, link, and link).
