I think it is fishy that many of the “end the lockdown” protests that are happening in the U.S. often prominently feature people who are brandishing what are essentially assault rifles, which the media then focuses on to cast the protests and associated anti-Establishment views as being “dangerous.” I think it is important that people are allowed to own such rifles, but I usually disagree with “open carry” laws where people can carry guns in public in such a manner (as opposed to “concealed carry.”) In many if not most cases the people attending the rallies who are carrying such weapons are actually covertly pro-Establishment and anti-gun activists who are involved in “Cointel pro”-type operations seeking to neutralize the effectiveness of the protests.
For example, this article on the leftist media outlet “The Guardian” details issues with the protests that are happening at the capitol building in Michigan, explaining that protesters are bringing guns, Confederate flags (despite the fact that Michigan is way in the North of the U.S.), nooses, and swastikas to the protests; and a video interview of Michigan’s leftist extremist governor Gretchen Whitmer is shown where she implies that all of the protesters at the capitol share the views of the most extreme ones. In reality, it is almost certain that most if not all of the controversial protesters at that event have been sent by the political Establishment in order to discredit it.
No gun can protect a citizen from a government’s armed forces, however gun ownership is still necessary for people to protect themselves when the government can not or (often intentionally) will not protect them.
(Also note: I think Henry “Kiki” Watson’s statements in the article following this one are what the Establishment has somehow “told” him to say for whatever reason, although that is just speculation on my part. I doubt the extremity of his mentality is particularly common in any event, although I’m sure there are some people who actually think that way.)
