[Note: March 9, 2020— I have re-written portions of this article.]
The “Far-Right” Swedish Democrat party made some gains in that country’s election last night, but a Reuters story has labeled them as “a party with roots in the white supremacist fringe”:
“The Sweden Democrats, a party with roots in the white supremacist fringe, won 17.6 percent and 63 seats, up from 12.9 percent and 49 seats in the last election four years ago, the biggest gain by any party in Sweden’s parliament, the Riksdag.”
“The results were largely in line with the conventional opinion polls tracked by Reuters in the run-up to the election but well below some online surveys that had predicted the Sweden Democrats could become the largest party.”
The Wikipedia page about the Sweden Democrats lists many of the alleged racist controversies of the group.
Actually, such “far-right” political parties often do have roots in extremism, but usually it is because of Establishment infiltration or because the entire party has been founded as an Establishment “controlled opposition” group.
Unfortunately that sort of infiltration in such groups is so prevalent that it has given the Establishment media an excuse to co-opt the term “far-right” to imply that it refers to white supremacism and neo-Nazis.
The term “far-right” only actually means “to be very against government meddling and control,” and of course it doesn’t mean “racism and bigotry.” See an interesting video here that explains what the terms “left wing” and “right wing” actually refer to.
A problem that has been keeping Europe headed on its current self-destructive path is the fact that the organizations that push against leftist Establishment corruption are often compromised to act in a bigoted manner due to infiltration, forcing activists to choose between various false alternatives.
[Note: March 9, 2020— I have re-written this article in a more summarized fashion.]
A strange “rare New York Times anonymous Op-Ed essay” by someone who claims to be “part of the resistance inside the Trump Administration” has “vowed to thwart parts of [Trump’s] agendas and his worst inclinations,” however the essay actually seemed to be created with the intention of causing Trump’s supporters to rally behind him due to making it appear as if he is being persecuted from within his own administration.
In the op-ed, the “insider” claimed that Trump is “amoral, opposed to freedom, reckless, ill-informed, and mentally incompetent”; and he said that John McCain is an example of a politician who should be “revered” instead because he had “the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.” He also said that Trump “feared” McCain who was “a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue.”
Here are some of the quotes from the “anti-Trump” op-ed:
I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
…
The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
I would know. I am one of them.
To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. …
But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.
That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.
The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. …
Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people.
In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.
…
From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at the commander in chief’s comments and actions.
Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.
It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.
…
Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us to allied, like-minded nations.
… But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable.
This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.
Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. …
The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility.
Senator John McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap, with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.
We may no longer have Senator McCain. But we will always have his example — a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue. Mr. Trump may fear such honorable men, but we should revere them.
There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single one: Americans.
[Note: March 8, 2020— I have revamped the text of this article.]
I can’t believe the endless media coverage about John McCain’s death. He was a very deceitful politician. I think the Establishment media’s massive outpouring of eulogies for him was calculated to send a message to the rest of the politicians that there isn’t consequences for being compromised and doing whatever they are told to do.
It’s interesting to see what different media outlets have to say about John McCain’s passing..
Breitbart called McCain a “Conservative Frenemy, American Hero.”
However, Alex Jones spoke about the truth of McCain’s corruption. Following is from this article: “Alex Jones explains the true character of the late John McCain, a notorious Deep State neocon who sold out the U.S. to ISIS, the ChiComs, and the big banks.”
The rest of the media has often been spinning the issue as an “Anti-Trump” story, such as in this Yahoo article where they talk to an African American guy who talks about the shamefulness of Trump not lowering the flag for more than a full day, ect..
And McCain’s death is still news, even today [over a week after it happened], such as in this NPR article: “McCain Makes A Final Return to Washington For Rare Honors.”
