Month: September 2016

[Note: March 31, 2020— This is another example of the type of an organization that the United Nations actually is.  Many people are under the impression that it is some sort of a “benevolent organization” with “high minded ideals,” however it is actually the instrument of an unelected dictatorial world government that is run by privately owned central banks.  Its innocuous facade is carefully cultivated to make it seem humane and altruistic, but its agendas actually forward harmful ulterior motives.]

The following information has been taken from the New American article by Alex Newman entitled “UN Killed Thousands of Haitians With Cholera, Claims Immunity”: 

A leaked UN report shows the UN’s guilt in dumping raw sewage into a Haitian river in 2010 that caused a widespread epidemic of cholera which killed potentially tens of thousands of people while former President Bill Clinton was the UN “Special Envoy for Haiti” overseeing UN relief efforts following the catastrophic earthquake that struck that region.

Officially, almost 10,000 Haitians died amid the epidemic, but studies show that potentially as many as 30,000 have succumbed to the disease spread by the UN.  At least 800,000 became infected with the disease that struck after almost 500 UN troops from Nepal sent to occupy Haiti were allowing their raw sewage to flow into the rivers that Haitians used for drinking water, bathing, and washing.  Studies show that the disaster could have been averted for as little as $2,000.

The UN always claims immunity in court for its crimes in Haiti, which include the negligence of dumping toxic sewage into public drinking water, deliberately slaughtering unarmed civilians on other occasions, and widespread sexual exploitation and abuse of children across Haiti by the UN forces occupying it.   The UN is largely dominated by unfree governments and dictatorships.

Thousands of Haitian victims of the UN’s cholera-spreading actions have banded together to sue the UN in U.S. court, but the UN has refused to even appear in court citing diplomatic immunity, and on August 18 a U.S. court agreed with the UN and the Obama administration that the UN is above the law, and it dismissed the lawsuit.

A confidential report sent to the UN by a law professor Philip Alston in August 8 of this year was leaked to the press, stating that among other things, the cholera epidemic that struck Haiti starting in 2010 “would not have broken out but for the actions of the United Nations.”

In the report Alston also said, “[It is] morally unconscionable, legally indefensible and politically self-defeating. It is also entirely unnecessary.  … [It] upholds a double standard according to which the U.N. insists that member states respect human rights, while rejecting any such responsibility for itself. … [The policy also] provides highly combustible fuel for those who claim that U.N. peacekeeping operations trample on the rights of those being protected.”

The UN boss Ban Ki Moon’s deputy spokesman Farhan Haq responded the New York Times about the matter saying “Over the past year, the U.N. has become convinced that it needs to do much more regarding its own involvement in the initial outbreak and the suffering of those affected by cholera. … [To that end,] a new response will be presented publicly within the next two months, once it has been fully elaborated, agreed with the Haitian authorities and discussed with member states.”  He also claimed that Ban’s office “wanted to take this opportunity to welcome this vital report.”

Other reports about the UN Cholera issue in Haiti have been coming out as well.  A report by the UN’s investigations department known as the “Office of Internal Oversight Services” explains that for years UN forces across Haiti dumped sewage in to public Haitian canals and even ignored warnings from laboratories about the fecal contamination and also failed to maintain water-treatment plants at the UN camps.  The report supplies “smoking-gun” evidence of the UN’s guilt, which is no surprise as the UN has a fanatical obsession with reducing the human population, in particularly the number of Africans.

Other UN reports document similar criminal negligence by UN missions around the world.  It appears that wherever the UN troops go, by dumping their waste using unsanitary methods they create massive public health hazards for the people they are supposedly sent to protect, and they then lie about doing so and hide behind “diplomatic immunity” to avoid accountability for the massive death and suffering that they cause.

A longtime Haitan journalist Jonathan Katz reported, “Once you start lying about something at the beginning, once you start covering up what you’ve done, literally, I mean I watched the soldiers at that base dig up their pipes and literally cover up evidence, once you start doing that, it’s very hard to stop.  Because then not only do you have to admit what you did in the first place, you then have to admit also, you’ve been lying about it for all these years. There need to be mechanisms, there need to be systems to hold powerful people, powerful countries, powerful entities, responsible for the things they do in places where people are very, very vulnerable.”

The UN forces have also earned a reputation as being savage predators who exploit and terrorize the local population, as UN troops are now infamous in Haiti for raping and sexually abusing woman and even children, and doing so with impunity.  In one case, UN troops kidnapped a mentally handicapped young boy and brutally raped him for five years, and in another case a Haitian boy was raped by UN troops in an incident that sparked a global outcry.  Similar horrors occur all over the world, from trafficking child-sex slaves out of Yugoslavia to raping young children across Africa and Asia.  In one Ivory Coast town, a survey revealed that eight out of 10 under girls reported being regularly sexually abused and raped by UN forces.

UN forces have also been known to slaughter Haitians with impunity, such as in 2006 when UN forces entered the Haitian community of Cité Soleil and began massacring random people, including children and pregnant woman, as a form of collective punishment for a protest the UN was unhappy about.  Similar massacres have happened before and after, sometimes involving the murder of dozens of civilians or more.

The UN’s approach to all of these atrocities is to cover it up as best as they can and claim diplomatic  immunity, while whistleblowers are ruthlessly persecuted by top officials.

From the New American article:  “It is time for U.S. taxpayers to stop funding the UN’s deadly and grotesque crime spree. The best way to do that would be to pursue an American exit from the dictators club — also known in Congress and beyond as an ‘Amexit.’  Legislation already in Congress, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (HR 1205),  would end U.S. membership in the UN and evict its spy-infested headquarters from American soil. All that is needed for the bill to become law is sufficient public pressure on Congress. In the meantime, lawmakers should cut off all funds for the corrupt and deadly UN as soon as possible.”

Following is a summary of this Breitbart article:

The journalist and historian Michael Paulwitz has written an article following the Friday release of figures by Germany’s Federal Statistics office which show massive demographic changes on the horizon for Germany.  He predicts the changes will be the death of Germany’s welfare state, where “hard struggles” over resources will make native Germans “inevitably loose out.”

— Only 21 percent of the total German population currently has a migrant background, but 36% percent of German children under five currently have foreign roots.

— In the city of Berlin, people with a migration background comprise 30 percent of residents.  Germans are already a minority in its district center and many of the surrounding central districts.

— Paulwitz wrote in his article, “First in the cities, later throughout the country, ethnic Germans are to become a minority in their own city and in their own country.  Will Germany still be, in the coming years and decades, the land of the Germans when immigration of people from non-European cultures continues at a high level?  One does not need much imagination to imagine how profoundly the population picture will change within the next two decades.”

— People with foreign roots are twice as likely to be unemployed as ethnic Germans and are much more likely to be educated to only a lower secondary school level or have no education background at all.

— Current mostly ethnic German citizens of 45 to 65 years old will have retired and withdrawn from the workforce in twenty years, ceasing to pay taxes and making the social and redistributive state no longer sustainable.

— The data was collected in 2015 and it fails to include the more than 1.6 million immigrants who arrived in 2015 and the first half of 2016, or the huge number of illegal immigrants living in Germany.

— While Angela Merkel’s open door policy was a “dramatic escalation” of previous policies, even before that a quarter of people aged between 15 and 45 had foreign roots in 2014.

— Through “family reunification,” this number [1.6 million] is expected to at least double if not multiply.

— There is an “inexhaustible supply” of Arabs and Africans who want to move to Germany, which Paulwitz describes as “demanding” but “lack the education or drive to create their own wealth.”

— Ethnic Germans are “pacified” and “aging” and he forecasts “hard struggles over resources” creating a grim future for Germany.

— Considering the huge number of people with foreign roots already present and their far higher fertility rates, and with no end in sight for the country’s policies of importing hundreds of thousands of migrants a year, Germans “will inevitably loose out.”

— Sexual assaults will also continue to increase along as the migrant populations do.

— Paulwitz concludes: “A government that decides to change the ethnic and cultural structure of the country without asking its people violates the principle of popular sovereignty,” also adding that it is surprising that so few citizens are trying to fight the change at the ballot box.

At a soccer match between Turkey and Greece held in Istanbul, Turkish fans overwhelmingly booed, shouted, and whistled during a one minute moment of silence for the victims of the November 13 Paris attacks which killed 130 people.  The crowd can be heard chanting “Martyrs don’t die.  The homeland will never be divided” and “Allahu Akbar,” and later they also booed the Greek national anthem.

Some apologists claim that the fans were chanting in support of the victims of the Paris attack but that is not true for a few reasons.  First of all because Turkey is predominantly Sunni Muslim and support for ISIS exists in the country, particularly because of Turkish opposition to Kurdish rebels who ISIS also opposes.  And also the fans booed the Greek national anthem in the same manner, which the Turkish President Recep Erdogan later chastised but did not mention the moment of silence.

Also see this CBS News article about the issue.

In this video, the Australian activist Kirralie Smith mentions many important issues with Islam.   Following is a summary of her statements:

— Some people accuse her of being divisive because she criticizes Islam, but in fact she is only pointing out what is divisive in Islam itself.  People also accuse her of promoting hate speech, but she is only criticizing the hate speech which is in the Quran and Hadith.

— She does not hate individual people but rather the ideology of Islam which condones the oppression of women and the persecution of gays and minority groups.  She highlights and exposes the violence in the Quran and Hadith, and she criticizes Muhammad condoning and encouraging rape, slavery, murder, cutting off limbs, chopping off people’s heads, and striking terror into the hearts of unbelievers.

— Some Muslims contact her privately and claim that Muslims who literally obey the Quran are not “real” Muslims, but she disagrees.  They try to argue to her that Allah and true Muslims are peaceful, and her response to them is that they should be devoting their time and energy to trying to convince devout Muslims who are violent that they are not being genuine Muslims.  Despite people claiming that groups like ISIS are not “true Muslims,” the truth of the matter is that such groups are actually following literal interpretations of the Quran and Hadith to justify their vile behavior.

—OIC (Organization of Islamic Countries) nations such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Yemen, Egypt, Indonesia, and Malaysia actually govern according to Sharia law, which follow explicitly violent and oppressive verses of the Quran and Hadith.  Many Islamic governments strike fear into the hearts of their citizens, and they achieve “peace” by threatening to stone, whip, cut off limbs, or execute people— which is all according the the direct and explicit commands of the Quran.

— Mainstream public Muslim figures should speak out against negative practices of Muslim groups and nations, but they do not.  Also individual everyday Muslims should stop wasting their efforts on inaccurately countering critics of Islam but instead they should criticize those who practice literal interpretations of what is written in the Quran and Hadith- but those who are brave enough to do so are severely punished by other Muslims.

— Muslims are expected to consider Muhammad to be a perfect example to follow, yet he married one of his wives when she was only six years old (and he was 55).  Due to this, the practice of grown men marrying children in Pakistan is not banned because doing so would be blasphemous and against the prophet himself.  Also in Turkey there are attempts to lower the age of consent to twelve years old.

— “Do true Muslims think Allah got it right when he said ‘women are deficient in the head?’  Who is the true Muslim, the one who agrees with Allah, or the one who disagrees?”

— Allah said that gays need to be executed, and there are Imams in Australia who say Allah is never wrong and it is a justifiable response to gays according to Sharia.

— The Quran teaches Muslims that they only need to follow the rules of the countries they live in only until Sharia law takes over, which is the ultimate goal of Islam.

— Instead of criticizing Western nations for not doing enough for refugees, Muslims should campaign for Islamic nations to use their wealth to fund and house the refugees.  Middle eastern countries do little if anything to help Syrian refugees, but instead they offer to help build mosques in places like Germany for asylum seekers to spread more Islam.  Muslim countries are acting the way that they are because their goal is the Islamization of the west.

— Anyone who continues to insist that Islam is peaceful is simply not credible or believable anymore.  It is obvious that many Muslims around the world are acting on hateful literal interpretations of the Quran and the Hadith.  Some are striking terror into the hearts of unbelievers by cutting off people’s heads and limbs.  Most Islamic governments literally apply Sharia law to oppress and create fear.

— Unfortunately it is important to spread the word about the fact that there are many dangerous Muslims in the world who think that Allah and Muhammad never made any wrong commandments.

Visit Kirralie Smith’s website:  https://kirraliesmith.org/

Visit Kirralie Smith’s YouTube Channel.

Following is a summary of this Breitbart article:

Several Arab and Western intelligence agencies have reported that tens of thousands of ISIS fighters have “gone missing” in Syria, Iraq, and Libya; not being found where they are expected to be at the conclusions of conflicts.  Battles “did not yield thousands of dead or captured fighters” as expected, according to an Arab intelligence official.

“That’s why it’s worrisome – these people are gone.  They either integrated into noncombatant communities or, more likely, infiltrated into neighboring countries – to Turkey, and from there to Europe and other Middle Eastern countries, and in Libya’s case, all over North Africa,” the official said, also mentioning that 700 Tunisian fighters are unaccounted for, while thousands more are being sought.

The following information is from a Russia Today article: 

The Associated Press has gathered documents and testimonials to produce a picture of widespread atrocities in Iraq and Syria where 55 ISIS mass graves have been located in Syria and 17 in Iraq, containing as many as 15,000 victims.

The information came from a satellite intelligence firm named AllSource that matches photos from space with eyewitness accounts, and also from aid groups such as Yazda, and often from ISIS itself that brags about its atrocities of killing “infidels” and “traitors.”

An investigator for the Iraqi Kurds said, “They are beheading them, shooting them, running them over in cars, all kinds of killing techniques, and they don’t even try to hide it.”

The biggest known massacre was committed in Tikrmt in June 2014, when ISIS gunned down up to 1,700 unarmed Shiite Iraqi Air Force recruits, forcing them to shout slogans as they laid down waiting to be executed.  Thirty-six of the perpetrators were hanged for the war crime earlier this month.   Another similar massacre also happened two days earlier near Ramadi as described by survivors who played dead and escaped during the night with 15 others.

With the war still ongoing in many areas such as Hardan, which is a Kurdish area, the authorities have only roped off the mass graves for excavating the dead in the future when resources will exist to do so, currently leaving the bodies exposed to the elements, to the horror of local villagers.

Since ISIS is enemies with different sects such as Shia and Yazidis, and different ethnicities such as Kurds, and even certain Sunni tribes, there are estimated to be hundreds of mass graves that will take years to be fully mapped for their victims to be given a proper burial.

“This is a drop in an ocean of mass graves expected to be discovered in the future in Syria,” said Ziad Awad, who is cataloging the ISIS massacres.

Following are points from a CNN article:

— European security officials estimate that 30 to 40 suspected ISIS terrorists who supported the November 13 Paris shootings that killed 130 people are still at large, and they believe they are preparing for more international attacks as the resources of security agencies are stretched beyond their limits.

— The Paris attacks that killed 130 was meant to be even broader and include other countries such as the Netherlands, and an operative allegedly linked to the Paris attackers remained free for months after authorities learned of his existence.

— The European countries most at risk are the ones launching attacks against ISIS:  France, Belgium, the Netherlands, the UK, Denmark, as well as Germany.

— The US is vulnerable also due to its porous border with Mexico, and Western European passport holders can travel to the U.S. without a visa.  U.S. nationals are able to travel to and from Syria and Turkey from the U.S. via Western Europe.

— It is essentially impossible to track ISIS sympathizers and former fighters due to its structure of concentric rings of secrecy where militants are unaware of who the others are that are involved.  For example the people supplying the weapons used in the Paris attacks had no idea what they would be used for.

— The number of European passport holders who have traveled to Syria and Iraq range from 6,000 to 9,000 people, many of whom traveled to fight for ISIS.

— As ISIS suffers losses in Syria and Iraq, its fighters will return to Europe in record numbers to launch attacks and mobilize others.  Security officials say that Europe tightening security would prompt ISIS to send as many fighters there as possible in the awareness that its ability to do so would not last indefinitely.

— During the past few years a wave of foreign fighters, a general increase in the Salafi movement, and “a sky-rocketing of right-wing-motivated criminal offenses” stretched security agencies beyond their limits.  Security services in Western and Central Europe and the Balkans are operating at full capacity just by trying to identify those returning from Syria and Iraq and then trying to identify those who are a threat.  Problems arise from budget and resource constraints along with sub-optimal intelligence sharing practices.

— An example of problems arising from inadequate security measures is the fact that it took months for one of the Paris attackers Abid Tabaouni to be tracked down as he was visiting Amsterdam and Brussels, with him posting pictures online of the Amsterdam’s waterfront skyline on a few occasions.

— ISIS propaganda is focusing on overwhelmingly inciting “lone wolf” individuals to launch independent attacks such as the Orlando nightclub shootings, which is a difficult element for security services to contend with.

From the video page: 

Written and directed by Martin Mawyer, founder of the Christian Action Network, Europe’s Last Stand is an insightful and eye opening view into the five-step methodical plan of radical Islam to overtake Europe … and the world.

Part One of this two-part series focuses on the first three pillars of the Islamic Conquest—Infiltration, Imams and Isolation—breaking down each point to fully explain how it is currently playing out in modern-day Europe, and inching closer to Islam’s goal of turning the continent into what some are calling Eurabia.

Part Two details out the final two pillars—Islamization and Implosion. Filled with first-hand accounts from those who are on the front lines in opposition to the Islamic Conquest, Europe’s Last Stand is an insightful look into the uprising that is currently taking place in Europe and should stand as a warning to America to be on its toes.

[Purchase from Amazon… Part 1,  Part 2]

In this video, Ex-Muslim Hamed Abdel-Samad debates issues of Islam on a German talk show.  He says that ISIS is an expression of orthodox Islam despite apologists claiming otherwise, explaining that all of its extreme practices are prescribed in the Quran.

[NOTE:  Following is a press release detailing a monograph released from the Center For Security Policy entitled “‘See No Sharia: ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ and the Disarming of America’s First Lines of Defense.”  It is Volume 9 in an nine part Civilization Jihad Series.  

This monograph explains that under both Republican and Democratic administrations, Islamists through the Muslim Brotherhood have gained access to policymakers in the White House, the FBI, and Departments of State, Justice, Defense, and Homeland Security.  It describes the trajectory flowing from such penetration and subversion manifesting in purging training programs, limitations on surveillance, case-making and rules of engagement, and eschewing anything that gives “offense” to Muslims.  The book also gives specific recommendations on how to restore the FBI and other law enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security, the military and the intelligence community.]

Video: “See no Sharia:  How our first lines of defense have been disarmed”

April 13, 2016

(Washington, D.C.):  For much of the past fifteen years, the United States government has failed to understand, let alone decisively defeat, the enemy that, under the banner of its al Qaeda franchise, murderously attacked our country on September 11, 2001.  The reason why that has been so – notwithstanding the bravery and skill of our men and women in uniform and the expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars – has been unclear to most Americans, including some in government.  Until now.

With the publication by the Center for Security Policy of a new book by two of its leaders, President Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. and Vice President Clare Lopez, “See No Sharia: ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ and the Disarming of America’s First Lines of Defense”, the case has been forcefully made that this sorry state of affairs is a product of a sustained and highly successful influence operation by Islamic supremacists.  Under both Republican and Democratic administrations, Islamists in general and the Muslim Brotherhood in particular have gained access to and considerable sway over policymakers in the White House, the FBI and the Departments of State, Justice, Defense and Homeland Security.

See No Sharia describes the trajectory that has flowed from such penetration and subversion.  It traces how fact-based counterterrorism and law enforcement have inexorably been supplanted by an approach defined by accommodations demanded by Islamists – purged lexicons and training programs, limitations on surveillance, case-making and rules of engagement and above all, eschewing anything that gives “offense” to Muslims.

In addition to showing the perils associated with such policies and practices as America faces the growing threat of global jihad and its animating doctrine of sharia, this book provides specific recommendations as to how to restore our first lines of defense – the FBI and other law enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security, the military and the intelligence community – whose effective service is needed today more than ever.

Frank Gaffney noted,

“       Americans expect government officials to fulfill their oaths of office by protecting the Constitution, the Republic it established and its people from all enemies, foreign and domestic. The vast majority of our public servants yearn to do their duty.  Yet, as See No Sharia makes plain, for at least a decade and a half, they have been obliged to conform to policies that greatly diminish their chances for success.  We simply cannot afford to disarm those in our first lines of defense against Islamic supremacism and its jihad – both the violent kind and the stealthy sort the Muslim Brotherhood calls ‘civilization jihad.’”

Clare Lopez added,

“       As a career intelligence professional, the extent to which our policymaking apparatus has been penetrated and subverted by Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist operatives is deeply problematic.  This book is meant to expose their handiwork – and to impel the urgently needed and long-overdue policy course-correction.”

The Center for Security Policy is proud to present this monograph as the latest in its Civilization Jihad Reader Series.

_______

This monograph can be downloaded from its website as a PDF for free, or purchased as a printed volume or Kindle from Amazon.

The rest of the monographs in the series can be viewed at:   http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/civilization-jihad-reader-series/