Watch a news segment talking about an 18 year old Yazidi girl in Iraq who was captured and sold into sex slavery by ISIS, being held for three months with five other Yazidi women by the men who bought them.
Yazidis are predominantly ethnic Kurds whose religion is based on ancient Persian Zoroastrianism, but to the Islamic State they are at best Pagans and at worst devil worshippers, which makes the Islamists think they are justified in killing their men, raping their women, and abducting their children.
Jinan says, “The men are not human. They think only of death and killing. They take drugs non-stop. They want to binge themselves on the whole world.”
Yazidi children are taken to military academies where they are indoctrinated with ISIS ideologies. The boys are taught to be soldiers, and the girls are taught to be Jihadi brides.
Jinan was lucky to escape, but more than 2,000 Yazidi woman were still being held by ISIS when the video was made, and thousands of other Yazidis have been displaced in the Kurdistan region.
Description: “Islam faith school in Turkey. The children are taught the militant hand waving while singing an innocuous song called Ciao Bello. They round it all off with a lot of chanting ‘allahu akbar’ while doing the militant fist waving. Very clever way to indoctrinate children.”
“Great Mogul and His Court Returning From the Great Mosque At Dehli, India” by Edwin Lord Weeks. Image from Wikipedia.
The following information has been summarized from this Islam-Watch article by T. Omar Moros:
A writing known as “Muhammad’s Final Sermon” which is often used by Islamists and apologists to portrait Muhammad as having a universal and peaceful attitude toward other cultures has been revealed to be a pseudo-Islamic hoax that had likely been written and passed off as being genuine hundreds of years ago by an anonymous Indian cleric who wanted to “enhance Islam.”
The most popular quote from the sermon is as follows:
“All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over a black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action …”(See the full text of the writing.)
The text surfaced when it was translated into English by Syed F. H. Faizi in 1991, leading to it becoming very popular while assumed to be real despite the fact that it was not legitimately sourced. However, research by T. Omar Moros shows the origin of the writing is likely due to it being forged by an anonymous cleric in India sometime during the three centuries of British colonialism in order to “enhance Islam” to help “undermine the racial, ethnic and caste systems that oppressed them.”
“[Faizi’s] version—oddly, there are more than one—is being used today to cast Islam as a universal, peaceful faith, instead of—as critics argue—a violent, deceitful, Arab-centric ideology used by powerful clerics to control the masses.”
…
“I was finally able to track down the origin of the translation from a cryptic ‘Faizi 145’ reference; the only one among dozens of postings I checked. … Yet, even Faizi does not provide his source. Highly unusual, considering how popular this version is with modern Muslims.”
“Faizi gives us as close to a source as he could when he describes in the introduction to Sermons how he translated and published a collection of obscure writings into English…”
“[Faizi wrote about his translation:] ‘… They were not available in the form of Khutbas but have been derived from various books of Ahadith and history. .. the authenticity of the texts thereof is still doubted by ulema. …’”
“In other words, Faizi said ‘derived’ sermons from various unnamed books not accepted by the ulema (scholarly Muslim clerics). He does not know the original sources, but welcomes readers to help in his search. As a reader of Faizi, I’m happy to take a swag at it. …”
[Moros’ theory is as follows:] “It is well known that over the centuries, especially on the periphery of Islamic civilization, in places like India, a great deal of bogus religious material was generated. Even the Caliphate is known to have generated many bogus ahadith to legitimize its political claims. For more than three centuries while Britain ruled India, anti-colonial Indians, including Muslims, were very interested in finding significant sources of inspiration that would undermine the racial, ethnic and caste systems that oppressed them. This era also saw the black/white racial dynamic and the Arab identity being introduced into language. It is, therefore, no great leap to surmise that an inspired young Muslim cleric would decide to enhance Islam, by writing a bit of historical fiction in order to achieve a practical result. Who in pre-Internet, pre-electric India would know? A complete collection of authenticated ahadith was as rare as a magic carpet in colonial India. It wouldn’t be the first time someone wrote phony Islamic tracts; not by a long shot. Maybe our cleric even thought, ‘Well, if I must be Muslim (apostates are killed), then I’ll make it more suitable to me’–the old ‘change from the inside’ strategy at work.”
“In lieu of hard evidence, I believe this scenario is more plausible than the fish tales Islamists routinely employ to explain ahadith. … At least two other versions are also used, but do not mention race at all.”
…
“Islamists, in keeping with their insecure habit of finding Muslims at the root of every major innovation, including the airplane and golf, market the Last Sermon to the left as the world’s first Charter on Social Justice. Yet the version they most promote, without sources, effectively dates to 1991. In the end, it doesn’t matter when it was published, or if it is a fraud. The proof is in the headlines. Today, as this is written, Hamas killed the leader of a rival jihadist group, a Muslim in Ohio threatened to kill his apostate daughter, the Taliban claimed responsibility for bombing NATO’s Kabul headquarters, and sharia law has failed to deliver equality and accountability to northern Nigeria. Slow day—is it Ramadan?”
The following information is summarized from this Infowars article:
A 29 year old Muslim man in Australia on a temporary visa stabbed a 21 year old British woman Mia Ayliffe-Chung to death and seriously injured a British man at a backpacker’s hostel while shouting “Allahu Akbar,” however local police only attributed the attack to “mental health issues,” saying the attack was not about race or religion.
Such claims by authorities concealing Islam as the cause of the violence is commonplace:
— Last week in Strasbourg, France, a Jewish rabbi was stabbed by a man shouting “Allahu Akbar,” with police dismissing the attacker as being “mentally ill.”
— Earlier this month, six people where stabbed during an attack in London, with the police calling the attacker “mentally ill” despite the fact that he was a devout Muslim who supported various Islamic terrorist groups.
— On August 7, two policewoman in Brussels were wounded when they were attacked by a man wielding a machete shouting “Allahu Akbar,” with a police spokesman saying man had “mental health problems.”
The following information is summarized from this Star article:
A study by a Thomas Quiggin, a former Canadian intelligence analyst, and Saied Shoaaib, a journalist originally from Egypt, shows that many Mosques and Islamic schools in Canada are espousing extremist teachings.
The authors of the study entitled “Lovers of the Death? Islamist Extremism in Mosques and Schools” say that what worries them the most is not so much the presence of the extremist literature, but the fact that they found nothing but such writings in several libraries.
They say the amount of openly available material and their analysis of social media postings confirm their views that many Canadians, including its politicians, are turning a blind eye to the dangers. They also warned that many young Canadians have become radicalized to violence.
The Canadian government will soon announce details of its creation of a National Office of Counter-Radicalization for conducting research and coordinating actives in Canada.
Last year the Senate defense and security committee issued a report saying that a number of foreign-trained Imams had been spreading extremist Islamic ideologies in Canada. It called for the government to work with Muslim communities to “investigate the options that are available for the training and certification of imams in Canada.”
The report was not supported by liberal senators on the committee and it was denounced by the National Council of Canadian Muslims as stigmatizing and failing to offer effective solutions for the challenge of violent extremism.
A study by the polling group Ipsos Mori shows that the French hold more anti-immigration feelings than their neighboring countries, with only 11 percent thinking immigration had a positive impact on their country, compared to 18 percent in Germany and 20 percent in Spain.
Also, 38 percent thought closing the borders would be a good idea, and 67 percent thought that terrorists are waiting in the country disguised as migrants.
The study took place between June 24 and July 8, weeks before the terrorist attacks in Nice and Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray.
